| Literature DB >> 34236112 |
Tanya Myers-Morales1, Martha M S Sim1, Tanner J DuCote1, Erin C Garcia1.
Abstract
Interbacterial antagonism and communication are driving forces behind microbial community development. In many Gram-negative bacteria, contact-dependent growth inhibition (CDI) systems contribute to these microbial interactions. CDI systems deliver the toxic C-terminus of a large surface exposed protein to the cytoplasm of neighboring bacteria upon cell-contact. Termed the BcpA-CT, import of this toxic effector domain is mediated by specific, yet largely unknown receptors on the recipient cell outer and inner membranes. In this study, we demonstrated that cytoplasmic membrane proteins GltJK, components of a predicted ABC-type transporter, are required for entry of CDI system protein BcpA-2 into Burkholderia multivorans recipient cells. Consistent with current CDI models, gltJK were also required for recipient cell susceptibility to a distinct BcpA-CT that shared sequences within the predicted "translocation domain" of BcpA-2. Strikingly, this translocation domain showed low sequence identity to the analogous region of an Escherichia coli GltJK-utilizing CDI system protein. Our results demonstrated that recipient bacteria expressing E. coli gltJK were resistant to BcpA-2-mediated interbacterial antagonism, suggesting that BcpA-2 specifically recognizes Burkholderia GltJK. Using a series of chimeric proteins, the specificity determinant was mapped to Burkholderia-specific sequences at the GltK C-terminus, providing insight into BcpA transport across the recipient cell cytoplasmic membrane.Entities:
Keywords: CDI; bacterial antagonism; bacterial competition
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34236112 PMCID: PMC9291907 DOI: 10.1111/mmi.14783
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mol Microbiol ISSN: 0950-382X Impact factor: 3.979
FIGURE 1Transposon mutagenesis and selection for contact‐dependent growth inhibition (CDI)‐resistant Burkholderia multivorans mutants. (a) B. multivorans CGD2M Δbcp‐2 recipient bacteria were mutagenized with miniTn5, pooled, and subjected to sequential rounds of co‐culture with wild‐type bacteria on agar. Competitive index (CI) values are shown for competition mixtures collected at 24 hr for CmR wild‐type donor bacteria co‐cultured with KanR Δbcp‐2 recipient bacteria (none; open symbols), Δbcp‐2 recipients complemented with cognate bcpI‐2 (black symbols), and the Δbcp‐2 transposon (Tn) mutant pool (gray symbols). Output CFUs for the Δbcp‐2 transposon mutant pool were collected after each competitive round, pooled, and used as the input for the next round. The CI was calculated as (output donor CFU/recipient CFU) divided by (input donor CFU/recipient CFU). Symbols represent CI values from one biological replicate and bars show the mean (n = 3). Dashed line shows CI = 1 (1:1 ratio of donor:recipient). CI values for the Tn mutant pool were compared to those of immune recipient bacteria (+bcpI‐2). Statistical differences were determined with two‐tailed Student’s t‐test. **p < .01. ns, not significant. (b) Competitive indices for wild‐type donor bacteria co‐cultured with Δbcp‐2 recipient bacteria (none; open symbols), Δbcp‐2 recipients complemented with cognate bcpI‐2, and individual Δbcp‐2 transposon mutants. Individual mutants were tested in two batches (left and right panels). Letters (a‒h) indicate the location of the transposon insertion for each mutant in panel C locus diagram. (c) Diagram showing the genetic organization B. multivorans CGD2M gltIJKL locus. Arrows indicate the approximate locations of unique transposon insertions conferring resistance to BcpA‐2‐mediated CDI (letters correspond to Tn mutants in b)
FIGURE 2Roles of gltJ, gltK and gltI in recipient cell susceptibility to Burkholderia multivorans contact‐dependent growth inhibition. Competitive indices (CI) for bacteria sampled from the edge of a colony biofilm after 24 hr co‐culture on agar are shown. CI was calculated as (output donor CFU/recipient CFU) divided by (input donor CFU/recipient CFU). Symbols represent CI from one biological replicate, and bars show the mean (n = 6 from two independent experiments). Dashed line shows CI = 1 (no competition). Statistical differences were determined with two‐tailed Student’s t‐test unless otherwise indicated. *p < .05; **p < .01; compared to corresponding recipient cells with no bcpI. (a) Wild‐type donor bacteria were competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells (open circles), Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipients carrying bcpI‐2 at an attTn7 site (black circles), and Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells with (gray squares) or without (white squares) gltJK at an attTn7 site. Statistical differences were determined with the Mann−Whitney test. (b) Wild‐type donor bacteria were competed against mutants in a) and bcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltI recipient cells with (gray triangles) or without (white triangles) gltI at an attTn7 site. Statistical differences were determined with the Mann−Whitney test. (c) B. multivorans Δbcp‐2 donor bacteria overexpressing bcpAIOB‐1 (from strong, constitutive promoter PS12) were competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells (open circles), Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipients carrying bcpI‐1 at an attTn7 site (black circles), and Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells with (gray squares) or without (white squares) gltJK at an attTn7 site. (d) Wild‐type (left panel) or ΔgltJK (right panel) donor bacteria were competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells with (black circles) or without (white circles) cognate bcpI‐2 at an attTn7 site
FIGURE 3Role of gltJK in BcpA‐2‐CT intracellular toxicity. Transconjugants obtained after introduction of pSCrhaB3 empty vector (top) or plasmid carrying bcpA‐2‐CT (bottom) into Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 mutant bacteria (left two columns) or Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK mutant bacteria (right two columns) that constitutively express cognate bcpI‐2 from an attTn7 site (first and third columns) or lack immunity (second and fourth columns)
FIGURE 4Ability of heterologous gltJK alleles to sensitize Burkholderia multivorans recipient cells to contact‐dependent growth inhibition mediated by BcpA‐2 and a related BcpA protein. Competitive indices (CI) for bacteria sampled from the edge of a colony biofilm after 24 hr co‐culture on agar are shown. CI was calculated as (output donor CFU/recipient CFU) divided by (input donor CFU/recipient CFU). Symbols represent CI from one biological replicate and bars show the mean (n = 6 from two independent experiments). Dashed line shows CI = 1 (no competition). Statistical differences were determined with Mann−Whitney test unless otherwise indicated. **p < .01; compared to corresponding recipient cells with no bcpI. (a) Wild‐type donor bacteria were competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells (open circles), Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipients carrying bcpI‐2 at an attTn7 site (black circles), and Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells complemented at an attTn7 site with empty vector (none, white squares), or PS12‐driven B. multivorans gltJK (gray squares), Escherichia coli gltJK (dark gray squares) or E. coli gltIJKL (dark gray squares). (b) Wild‐type donor bacteria were competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells (open circles), Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipients carrying bcpI‐2 at an attTn7 site (black circles), and Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells complemented at an attTn7 site with empty vector (none, white squares) or PS12‐driven B. multivorans gltJK (gray squares) or Burkholderia thailandensis gltJK (dark gray squares). Statistical differences were determined with two‐tailed Student’s t‐test. (c) Graphical representations of the BcpA‐CT domains and BcpI proteins from B. multivorans CGD2M (top), Burkholderia cenocepacia Bp8968 (middle) and chimeric strain constructed (CGD2M‐30, bottom). Arrow indicates the location of the VENN motif and theoretical N‐terminal end of the BcpA‐CT region. Approximate locations of the putative translocation domain (TD) and effector domain (ED) of the BcpA‐CT are shown. (d) Chimeric B. multivorans donor bacteria (CGD2M‐30) producing chimeric BcpA‐2 containing the BcpA‐CT from B. cenocepacia Bp8968 (along with its cognate BcpI and an additional hypothetical ORF) was competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells (open circles), Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipients carrying B. cenocepacia Bp8968 bcpI at an attTn7 site (gray circles), and Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells complemented at an attTn7 site with empty vector (none, white squares), or PS12‐driven B. multivorans gltJK (gray squares) or E. coli gltJK (dark gray squares)
FIGURE 5Individual contributions of GltJ and GltK to sensitivity to BcpA‐2‐mediated contact‐dependent growth inhibition. (a) Wild‐type donor bacteria were competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells (open circles), Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipients carrying bcpI‐2 at an attTn7 site (black circles), and Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells complemented at an attTn7 site with empty vector (none, white squares) or PS12‐driven Burkholderia multivorans gltJ or gltK (gray squares). Competitive indices (CI) for bacteria sampled from the edge of a colony biofilm after 24 hr co‐culture on agar are shown. CI was calculated as (output donor CFU/recipient CFU) divided by (input donor CFU/recipient CFU). Symbols represent CI from one biological replicate and bars show the mean (n = 6 from two independent experiments). Dashed line shows CI = 1 (no competition). Statistical differences were determined with two‐tailed Student’s t‐test. **p < .01; compared to corresponding recipient cells with no bcpI unless otherwise indicated. (b) Competition assays as described in a. Wild‐type donor bacteria were also competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells complemented at each of two attTn7 sites with combinations of PS12‐driven gltJ or gltK from Escherichia coli or B. multivorans. (c) Competition assays as described in a. Wild‐type donor bacteria were also competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells complemented at each of two attTn7 sites with B. multivorans gltJ and gltK (gray circles). (d) Competition assays as described in a. Wild‐type donor bacteria were also competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells complemented at each of two attTn7 sites with empty vectors (none, white squares) or B. multivorans gltJ and untagged gltK or FLAG‐tagged gltK (gray squares). (e) Western blots of subcellular fractions of Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK bacteria complemented at each of two attTn7 sites with combinations of gltJ and FLAG‐tagged gltK from B. multivorans and E. coli (or untagged gltK; first lanes of each fraction). Equal amounts of each fraction (cytoplasmic, outer membrane [Sarkosyl‐soluble], and inner membrane [Sarkosyl‐insoluble]) were resolved on 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis gels and blots probed with anti‐ FLAG peptide (bottom), anti‐E. coli RNA Polymerase β subunit (RpoB; top), and anti‐Salmonella typhii Outer Membrane protein A (OmpA, middle) antibodies. Expected masses for GltK, OmpA and RpoB are ~26, ~35, and 150 kDa, respectively
FIGURE 6Contribution of GltJ to the specificity of BcpA‐2 translocation. (a) Amino acid alignment of GltJ from Burkholderia multivorans CGD2M and Escherichia coli MG1655. Yellow lines indicate the predicted periplasmic regions and black boxes show the regions changed in the constructed chimeras. (b) Graphic representation of the GltJ proteins from B. multivorans and E. coli and the chimeras constructed with indicated residue numbers. Percent identity of each protein/chimera to B. multivorans CGD2M GltJ is shown to the right. (c) Wild‐type donor bacteria were competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells (open circles), Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipients carrying bcpI‐2 at an attTn7 site (black circles), and Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells complemented at each of two attTn7 sites with empty vectors (none, white squares) or PS12‐driven B. multivorans gltK and the indicated gltJ allele: B. multivorans gltJ (gray squares), E. coli gltJ (dark gray squares), or genes to produce chimeric GltJ proteins gltJ (red squares) or gltJ (blue squares). Competitive indices (CI) for bacteria sampled from the edge of a colony biofilm after 24 hr co‐culture on agar are shown. CI was calculated as (output donor CFU/recipient CFU) divided by (input donor CFU/recipient CFU). Symbols represent CI from one biological replicate and bars show the mean (n = 6 from two independent experiments). Dashed line shows CI = 1 (no competition). Statistical differences were determined with two‐tailed Student’s t‐test. *p < .05; **p < .01; compared as shown
FIGURE 7Contribution of GltK to the specificity of the BcpA2 translocation. (a) Amino acid alignment of GltK from Burkholderia multivorans CGD2M and Escherichia coli MG1655. Yellow lines indicate the predicted periplasmic regions and black boxes show the regions changed in the constructed chimeras. (b) Graphic representation of the GltK proteins from B. multivorans and E. coli and the chimeras constructed with indicated residue numbers. Percent identity of each protein/chimera to B. multivorans CGD2M GltK is shown to the right. (c) Wild‐type donor bacteria were competed against Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipient cells (open circles), Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 recipients carrying bcpI‐2 at an attTn7 site (black circles), and Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK recipient cells complemented at each of two attTn7 sites with empty vectors (none, white squares) or PS12‐driven B. multivorans gltJ and the indicated gltK allele: B. multivorans gltK (gray squares), E. coli gltK (dark gray squares), or genes to produce chimeric GltK proteins gltK (red squares), gltK (blue squares) gltK (green squares), gltK (orange squares), gltK (purple squares), or gltK (yellow squares). Competitive indices (CI) for bacteria sampled from the edge of a colony biofilm after 24 hr co‐culture on agar are shown. CI was calculated as (output donor CFU/recipient CFU) divided by (input donor CFU/recipient CFU). Symbols represent CI from one biological replicate and bars show the mean (n = 6 for two independent experiments). Dashed line shows CI = 1 (no competition). Statistical differences were determined with two‐tailed Student’s t‐test. **p < .01; compared to corresponding recipient cells with no bcpI. (d) Western blots of subcellular fractions of Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK bacteria complemented at each of two attTn7 sites with PS12‐driven B. multivorans gltJ and the indicated gltK allele: B. multivorans gltK (untagged), or genes to produce chimeric GltK‐FLAG proteins gltK‐FLAG and gltK‐FLAG. Equal amounts of each fraction (cytoplasmic, outer membrane [Sarkosyl‐soluble], and inner membrane [Sarkosyl‐insoluble]) were resolved on 12% sodium dodecyl sulfate‐polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE) gels and blots probed with anti‐ FLAG peptide (bottom), anti‐E. coli RNA Polymerase β subunit (RpoB; top), and anti‐Salmonella typhii Outer Membrane protein A (OmpA, middle) antibodies. Expected masses for GltK, OmpA and RpoB are ~26, ~35 and 150, respectively. (e) Equal amounts of the inner membrane fraction samples shown in d) (derived from Δbcp‐1 Δbcp‐2 ΔgltJK mutant bacteria carrying the indicated gltJ and gltK alleles) were resolved on 12% SDS‐PAGE and visualized by silver staining. Boxed region indicates region shown in in FLAG Western Blot in d)
FIGURE 8Schematic of predicted GltJ and GltK membrane topologies and contribution to BcpA‐CT‐2 translocation specificity. (a) Predicted GltJ membrane topology, showing the two putative periplasmic region(s) altered in the chimeric GltJ proteins (red). (b) Predicted GltK membrane topology, highlighting the three region(s) altered in chimeric GltK proteins. Blue shading denotes regions that did not contribute significantly to BcpA‐CT‐2 translocation specificity and orange shading shows the region that required Burkholderia sequence for BcpA‐CT‐2 translocation. Residue numbers for predicted transmembrane helices are indicated
Bacterial strains and mutants used in this study
| Strain | Description | References |
|---|---|---|
|
| Conjugation donor strain, Δ | López et al. ( |
|
|
| |
| CGD2M | Wild‐type | |
| Δ | In‐frame deletion of | Myers‐Morales et al. ( |
| Δ | In‐frame deletion of | Myers‐Morales et al. ( |
| Δ | In‐frame deletion of | This study |
| Δ | In‐frame deletion of | This study |
| Δ | In‐frame deletion of | This study |
| Δ | In‐frame deletion of | This study |
| CGD2M‐30 | CGD2M with the native | This study |
| CGD2M‐32 | CGD2M with the native | This study |
Plasmids used in this study
| Strain or plasmid | Description | References |
|---|---|---|
| pEXKm5 |
| López et al. ( |
| pUC18T‐miniTn7‐kan | Plasmid for | Choi et al. ( |
| pTNS3 | Helper plasmid for | Choi et al. ( |
| pUCS12 | PS12 promoter in pUC18T‐miniTn7‐kan, AmpR, KanR | Anderson et al. ( |
| pUCCm | CmR plasmid for | Anderson et al. ( |
| pUCTet | TetR plasmid for | Anderson et al. ( |
| pECG69 |
| Myers‐Morales et al. ( |
| pECG70 |
| Myers‐Morales et al. ( |
| pECG74 | First ~500 bp of | Myers‐Morales et al. ( |
| pUT‐miniTn5‐Kn | Used for transposon mutagenesis, KanR | de Lorenzo et al. ( |
| pScrhaB3 | Used for expression of genes under rhamnose induction, KanR | Cardona and Valvano ( |
| pTMM009 | Deletion allele for | This study |
| pTMM012 |
| This study |
| pTMM013 |
| This study |
| pTMM016 |
| This study |
| pTMM018 |
| This study |
| pTMM019 |
| This study |
| pTMM020 |
| This study |
| pTMM021 |
| This study |
| pJChim1 | GeneArt plasmid containing | This study |
| pKChim1 | GeneArt plasmid containin | This study |
| pKChim2 | GeneArt plasmid containin | This study |
| pTiT01 | GeneArt plasmid for | This study |
| pBp8968 | GeneArt plasmid for | This study |
| pTMM022 |
| This study |
| ipTMM023 |
| This study |
| pTMM024 |
| This study |
| pTMM025 | CGD2M | This study |
| pTMM027 |
| This study |
| pTMM030 | Allelic exchange plasmid for | This study |
| pTMM031 |
| This study |
| pTMM032 | Allelic exchange plasmid for | This study |
| pTMM034 | Deletion allele for | This study |
| pTMM035 |
| This study |
| pTMM036 |
| This study |
| pTMM037 |
| This study |
| pTMM038 |
| This study |
| pTMM039 |
| This study |
| pTMM040 |
| This study |
| pTMM041 |
| This study |
| pTMM042 |
| This study |
| pTMM046 |
| This study |
| pTMM047 |
| This study |
Abbreviations: Amp, ampicillin; Cm, chloramphenicol; Kan, kanamycin; Tet, tetracycline.