Amicia Phillips1, Pascal Borry2, Ine Van Hoyweghen3, Danya F Vears2,4,5. 1. Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium. amicia.phillips@kuleuven.be. 2. Center for Biomedical Ethics and Law, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leuven, Belgium. 3. Life Sciences and Society Lab, Center for Sociological Research, Leuven, Belgium. 4. Biomedical Ethics Research Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Australia. 5. Melbourne Law School, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Australia.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Findings from genomic sequencing can have important implications for patients and family members. Yet, when a patient does not consent to the disclosure of genetic information to relatives, it is unclear how health-care professionals (HCPs) should balance their responsibilities toward patients and their family members and whether breaches in confidentiality are warranted. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of normative documents to understand how HCPs should discuss and facilitate family disclosure, and what should be done in cases where the patient does not consent to disclosure. RESULTS: We analyzed 35 documents from advisory committees at the national, European, and international level. We identified discrepancies regarding the recommended role of HCPs in disclosure. While almost all normative documents supported the disclosure of genetic information without patient consent in limited conditions, the conditions for disclosure were often not well defined. Documents provided varying degrees of information regarding what actions HCPs must take in such situations. CONCLUSION: Our findings present concerns regarding the ability of these normative documents to guide HCPs' decision making around the disclosure of genetic information to family members. Clearer guidance outlining the responsibilities and acceptability of disclosure is necessary to facilitate disclosure of genetic information to family members.
PURPOSE: Findings from genomic sequencing can have important implications for patients and family members. Yet, when a patient does not consent to the disclosure of genetic information to relatives, it is unclear how health-care professionals (HCPs) should balance their responsibilities toward patients and their family members and whether breaches in confidentiality are warranted. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of normative documents to understand how HCPs should discuss and facilitate family disclosure, and what should be done in cases where the patient does not consent to disclosure. RESULTS: We analyzed 35 documents from advisory committees at the national, European, and international level. We identified discrepancies regarding the recommended role of HCPs in disclosure. While almost all normative documents supported the disclosure of genetic information without patient consent in limited conditions, the conditions for disclosure were often not well defined. Documents provided varying degrees of information regarding what actions HCPs must take in such situations. CONCLUSION: Our findings present concerns regarding the ability of these normative documents to guide HCPs' decision making around the disclosure of genetic information to family members. Clearer guidance outlining the responsibilities and acceptability of disclosure is necessary to facilitate disclosure of genetic information to family members.
Authors: Bronson D Riley; Julie O Culver; Cécile Skrzynia; Leigha A Senter; June A Peters; Josephine W Costalas; Faith Callif-Daley; Sherry C Grumet; Katherine S Hunt; Rebecca S Nagy; Wendy C McKinnon; Nancie M Petrucelli; Robin L Bennett; Angela M Trepanier Journal: J Genet Couns Date: 2011-12-02 Impact factor: 2.537
Authors: Jane Tiller; Gemma Bilkey; Rebecca Macintosh; Sarah O'Sullivan; Stephanie Groube; Marili Palover; Nicholas Pachter; Mark Rothstein; Paul Lacaze; Margaret Otlowski Journal: Eur J Med Genet Date: 2020-08-14 Impact factor: 2.708
Authors: Celine H M Leenen; Mariska den Heijer; Conny van der Meer; Ernst J Kuipers; Monique E van Leerdam; Anja Wagner Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: Carla Pedrazzani; Monica Aceti; Reka Schweighoffer; Andrea Kaiser-Grolimund; Nicole Bürki; Pierre O Chappuis; Rossella Graffeo; Christian Monnerat; Olivia Pagani; Manuela Rabaglio; Maria C Katapodi; Maria Caiata-Zufferey Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2022-07-29