| Literature DB >> 34234215 |
Liang-Hao Ding1, Yongjia Yu2, Elijah F Edmondson3, Michael M Weil4, Laurentiu M Pop1, Maureen McCarthy5, Robert L Ullrich6, Michael D Story7,8.
Abstract
High-charge, high-energy ion particle (HZE) radiations are extraterrestrial in origin and characterized by high linear energy transfer (high-LET), which causes more severe cell damage than low-LET radiations like γ-rays or photons. High-LET radiation poses potential cancer risks for astronauts on deep space missions, but the studies of its carcinogenic effects have relied heavily on animal models. It remains uncertain whether such data are applicable to human disease. Here, we used genomics approaches to directly compare high-LET radiation-induced, low-LET radiation-induced and spontaneous hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in mice with a human HCC cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). We identified common molecular pathways between mouse and human HCC and discovered a subset of orthologous genes (mR-HCC) that associated high-LET radiation-induced mouse HCC with a subgroup (mrHCC2) of the TCGA cohort. The mrHCC2 TCGA cohort was more enriched with tumor-suppressing immune cells and showed a better prognostic outcome than other patient subgroups.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34234215 PMCID: PMC8263559 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93467-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1Unsupervised analysis of gene expression profiles in mouse HCC. (a) Unsupervised Principle Component Analysis (PCA) indicated distinct gene expression profiles between HCC and non-HCC liver samples. (b) Sources of Variation (SOV) analysis showed that HCC contributed to the largest variances. Interactions of HCC and radiation showed a slight increase in F ratios, which indicates modest differences in HCC induced by different radiation types.
Figure 2Differential gene expression and signaling pathways analysis. (a) Venn diagram shows the number of differentially expressed genes in different types of mouse HCC in comparison with normal mouse liver. (b) Canonical signaling pathways that changed in each type of mouse HCC were summarized into functional groups. The heatmap shows averaged z-scores of all pathways within each functional category. A positive z-score indicates activation; a negative z-score indicates suppression. (c) Signaling pathways known to be associated with human HCC also changed in mouse HCC models. Z-scores representing activation (positive) or suppression (negative) of the pathways were shown as a heatmap.
Figure 3A gene set (mR-HCC) that discriminated mouse HCC induced by different radiation types. (a) Supervised clustering analysis using genes identified from ANOVA not only clustered HCC and non-HCC samples, they also separated un-irradiated and different radiation types in each group. (b) Gene functional analysis showed significantly enriched functional groups associated with the gene set. The heatmap was plotted with activation z-scores.
Figure 4The mR-HCC gene set derived from the mouse HCC model identified subgroups of the human TCGA HCC cohort. (a) Clustering analysis of TCGA HCC samples using log2 ratios of mR-HCC genes. The clustering defined 3 clusters: mrHCC1, mrHCC2, and mrHCC3. Rows of annotations under the dendrogram are overlaid with molecular subtypes previously published by TCGA. (b) Kaplan–Meier analysis in human HCC based on mrHCC clusters. The survival probability differed significantly (p < 0.05) across the three clusters, with patients in the mrHCC2 subgroup showing better survival. Straight lines indicate median survival time in each mrHCC subgroup. (c) Clustering analysis of integrated mouse and human expression data using mR-HCC genes. High-LET radiation-induced mouse HCC samples were clustered in mrHCC2; low-LET radiation-induced and spontaneous mouse HCC were clustered in mrHCC3. Heatmap was plotted using log2 radios of gene expressions between tumor and normal liver. (d) Comparison of averaged expression ratios using a subset of mR-HCC genes identified as related to HCC via data mining of the published literature. The mouse expression ratios were high-LET vs. low-LET/spontaneous HCC samples; the human expression ratios were mrHCC2 vs. human mrHCC3 samples.
Figure 5Profiles of tumor-infiltrating immune cells in mouse and human HCC. (a) Average values of relative proportions of immune cells in each mrHCC cluster of human TCGA HCC cohorts. Bar: standard error. *Immune cell proportions of mrHCC2 were significantly different from either mrHCC1 or mrHCC3 (p < 0.05). (b) Average values of relative proportions of immune cells in high-LET, low-LET and spontaneous mouse HCC. Bar: standard error. (c) Ratios of CD4+/CD8+ tumor-infiltrating T cells in different subgroups of mouse and human HCC. Bar: standard error.