Literature DB >> 34233617

Genomic prediction with non-additive effects in beef cattle: stability of variance component and genetic effect estimates against population size.

Akio Onogi1, Toshio Watanabe2, Atsushi Ogino2, Kazuhito Kurogi3, Kenji Togashi2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Genomic prediction is now an essential technology for genetic improvement in animal and plant breeding. Whereas emphasis has been placed on predicting the breeding values, the prediction of non-additive genetic effects has also been of interest. In this study, we assessed the potential of genomic prediction using non-additive effects for phenotypic prediction in Japanese Black, a beef cattle breed. In addition, we examined the stability of variance component and genetic effect estimates against population size by subsampling with different sample sizes.
RESULTS: Records of six carcass traits, namely, carcass weight, rib eye area, rib thickness, subcutaneous fat thickness, yield rate and beef marbling score, for 9850 animals were used for analyses. As the non-additive genetic effects, dominance, additive-by-additive, additive-by-dominance and dominance-by-dominance effects were considered. The covariance structures of these genetic effects were defined using genome-wide SNPs. Using single-trait animal models with different combinations of genetic effects, it was found that 12.6-19.5 % of phenotypic variance were occupied by the additive-by-additive variance, whereas little dominance variance was observed. In cross-validation, adding the additive-by-additive effects had little influence on predictive accuracy and bias. Subsampling analyses showed that estimation of the additive-by-additive effects was highly variable when phenotypes were not available. On the other hand, the estimates of the additive-by-additive variance components were less affected by reduction of the population size.
CONCLUSIONS: The six carcass traits of Japanese Black cattle showed moderate or relatively high levels of additive-by-additive variance components, although incorporating the additive-by-additive effects did not improve the predictive accuracy. Subsampling analysis suggested that estimation of the additive-by-additive effects was highly reliant on the phenotypic values of the animals to be estimated, as supported by low off-diagonal values of the relationship matrix. On the other hand, estimates of the additive-by-additive variance components were relatively stable against reduction of the population size compared with the estimates of the corresponding genetic effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dominance; Epistasis; GBLUP; Genomic selection; Mixed model

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34233617      PMCID: PMC8262069          DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07792-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Genomics        ISSN: 1471-2164            Impact factor:   3.969


  22 in total

1.  Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps.

Authors:  T H Meuwissen; B J Hayes; M E Goddard
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  A unified model for functional and statistical epistasis and its application in quantitative trait Loci analysis.

Authors:  José M Alvarez-Castro; Orjan Carlborg
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Changes in genetic selection differentials and generation intervals in US Holstein dairy cattle as a result of genomic selection.

Authors:  Adriana García-Ruiz; John B Cole; Paul M VanRaden; George R Wiggans; Felipe J Ruiz-López; Curtis P Van Tassell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering.

Authors:  Sharon R Browning; Brian L Browning
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2007-09-21       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Orthogonal Estimates of Variances for Additive, Dominance, and Epistatic Effects in Populations.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Andrés Legarra; Miguel A Toro; Luis Varona
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 4.562

6.  Efficient Algorithms for Calculating Epistatic Genomic Relationship Matrices.

Authors:  Yong Jiang; Jochen C Reif
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-24       Impact factor: 4.562

7.  Including dominance effects in the genomic BLUP method for genomic evaluation.

Authors:  Motohide Nishio; Masahiro Satoh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Predicting expected progeny difference for marbling score in Angus cattle using artificial neural networks and Bayesian regression models.

Authors:  Hayrettin Okut; Xiao-Liao Wu; Guilherme J M Rosa; Stewart Bauck; Brent W Woodward; Robert D Schnabel; Jeremy F Taylor; Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  Genome-Assisted Prediction of Quantitative Traits Using the R Package sommer.

Authors:  Giovanny Covarrubias-Pazaran
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-06-06       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Genomic Prediction and Association Analysis with Models Including Dominance Effects for Important Traits in Chinese Simmental Beef Cattle.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Lei Xu; Zezhao Wang; Ling Xu; Yan Chen; Lupei Zhang; Lingyang Xu; Xue Gao; Huijiang Gao; Bo Zhu; Junya Li
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 2.752

View more
  2 in total

1.  Genomic dissection of repeatability considering additive and nonadditive genetic effects for semen production traits in beef and dairy bulls.

Authors:  Rintaro Nagai; Masashi Kinukawa; Toshio Watanabe; Atsushi Ogino; Kazuhito Kurogi; Kazunori Adachi; Masahiro Satoh; Yoshinobu Uemoto
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

2.  Heritability and genetic correlation estimates of semen production traits with litter traits and pork production traits in purebred Duroc pigs.

Authors:  Shinichiro Ogawa; Makoto Kimata; Masamitsu Tomiyama; Masahiro Satoh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.338

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.