Dario Di Perri1, Emmanuel Jouglar2, Ellen Blanc3, Anne Ducassou4, Aymeri Huchet5, Céline Vigneron6, Alexandre Escande7, Sophie Chapet8, Julie Leseur9, Valérie Bernier10, Christian Carrie1, Valentine Martin11, Line Claude1. 1. Department of radiation oncology, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. 2. Department of radiation oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Nantes, France. 3. Department of clinical research and innovation, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France. 4. Department of radiation oncology, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopôle, Toulouse, France. 5. Department of radiation oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Bordeaux, France. 6. Department of radiation oncology, Centre Paul Strauss, Strasbourg, France. 7. Department of radiation oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France. 8. Department of radiation oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Tours, France. 9. Department of radiation oncology, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France. 10. Department of radiation oncology, Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine, Nancy, France. 11. Department of radiation oncology, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: While hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been largely adopted in the adult setting, its use remains limited in pediatric patients. This is due, among other factors, to fear of potential toxicities of hypofractionated regimens at a young age. In this context, we report the preliminary acute (<3 months from SBRT) and middle-term (3-24 months) toxicity results of a national prospective study investigating SBRT in pediatric patients. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2019, 61 patients were included. The first 40 patients (median age: 12 y, range: 3-20) who completed a 2-year-follow-up were included in the present analysis. SBRT was used for treating lung, brain or (para)spinal lesions, either as first irradiation (35%) or in the reirradiation setting (65%). RESULTS: Acute and middle-term grade ≥2 toxicities occurred in 12.5 and 7.5% of the patients, respectively. No grade ≥4 toxicities occurred. Almost all toxicities occurred in the reirradiation setting. CONCLUSION: SBRT showed a favorable safety profile in young patients treated for lung, brain, and (para)spinal lesions. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: SBRT appeared to be safe in pediatric patients treated for multiple oncology indications. These results support further evaluation of SBRT, which may have a role to play in this patient population in the future.
OBJECTIVES: While hypofractionated stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has been largely adopted in the adult setting, its use remains limited in pediatric patients. This is due, among other factors, to fear of potential toxicities of hypofractionated regimens at a young age. In this context, we report the preliminary acute (<3 months from SBRT) and middle-term (3-24 months) toxicity results of a national prospective study investigating SBRT in pediatric patients. METHODS: Between 2013 and 2019, 61 patients were included. The first 40 patients (median age: 12 y, range: 3-20) who completed a 2-year-follow-up were included in the present analysis. SBRT was used for treating lung, brain or (para)spinal lesions, either as first irradiation (35%) or in the reirradiation setting (65%). RESULTS: Acute and middle-term grade ≥2 toxicities occurred in 12.5 and 7.5% of the patients, respectively. No grade ≥4 toxicities occurred. Almost all toxicities occurred in the reirradiation setting. CONCLUSION: SBRT showed a favorable safety profile in young patients treated for lung, brain, and (para)spinal lesions. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: SBRT appeared to be safe in pediatric patients treated for multiple oncology indications. These results support further evaluation of SBRT, which may have a role to play in this patient population in the future.
Authors: Sara Alcorn; Kristina Nilsson; Avani D Rao; Matthew M Ladra; Ralph P Ermoian; Rosangela C Villar; Michael J Chen; Daria Kobyzeva; Alexey V Nechesnyuk; Eric Ford; Shannon MacDonald; Brian Winey; Karin Dieckmann; Stephanie A Terezakis Journal: J Pediatr Hematol Oncol Date: 2018-10 Impact factor: 1.289
Authors: E Chandy; H Taylor; S Gaito; E Wells; C Jones; C Meehan; H Burland; J Stone; C Snowball; J Mashru; C Riddell; Y Hon; L Welsh; F Saran; H Mandeville Journal: Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) Date: 2019-12-06 Impact factor: 4.126
Authors: Diana A R Julie; Zartaj Ahmed; Stephen C Karceski; Susan C Pannullo; Theodore H Schwartz; Bhupesh Parashar; A Gabriella Wernicke Journal: Seizure Date: 2019-06-12 Impact factor: 3.184
Authors: Susan M Hiniker; Arun Rangaswami; Matthew P Lungren; Avnesh S Thakor; Waldo Concepcion; Kathleen E Balazy; Nataliya Kovalchuk; Sarah S Donaldson Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2016-11-05 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Thomas E Merchant; Frederick A Boop; Larry E Kun; Robert A Sanford Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-05-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Hideyuki Kano; Yan-Hua Su; Hsiu-Mei Wu; Gabriela Simonova; Roman Liscak; Or Cohen-Inbar; Jason P Sheehan; Antonio Meola; Mayur Sharma; Gene H Barnett; David Mathieu; Lucas T Vasas; Anthony M Kaufmann; Rachel C Jacobs; L Dade Lunsford Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-01-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: Lindsay C Brown; Rachael A Lester; Michael P Grams; Michael G Haddock; Kenneth R Olivier; Carola A S Arndt; Peter S Rose; Nadia N Laack Journal: Sarcoma Date: 2014-12-09