Literature DB >> 34232755

High Taxonomic Diversity in Ship Bilges Presents Challenges for Monitoring Microbial Corrosion and Opportunity To Utilize Community Functional Profiling.

J L Wood1, W C Neil2, S A Wade1.   

Abstract

One of the key areas in which microbially influenced corrosion (MIC) has been found to be a problem is in the bilges of maritime vessels. To establish effective biological monitoring protocols, baseline knowledge of the temporal and spatial biological variation within bilges, as well as the effectiveness of different sampling methodologies, is critical. We used 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding of pelagic and sessile bacterial communities from ship bilges to assess the variation in bilge bacterial communities to determine how the inherent bilge diversity could guide or constrain biological monitoring. Bilge communities exhibited high levels of spatial and temporal variation, with >80% of the community able to be turned over in the space of 3 months, likely due to disturbance events such as cleaning and maintenance. Sessile and pelagic communities within a given bilge were also inherently distinct, with dominant exact sequence variants (ESVs) rarely shared between the two. Taxa containing KEGG orthologies (KOs) associated with dissimilatory sulfate reduction and biofilm production, functions typically associated with MIC, were generally more prevalent in sessile communities. Collectively, our findings indicate that neither bilge water nor an unaffected bilge from within the same vessel would constitute an appropriate reference community for MIC diagnosis. Optimal sampling locations and strategies that could be incorporated into a standardized method for monitoring bilge biology in relation to MIC were identified. Finally, taxonomic and functional comparisons of bilge diversity highlight the potential of functional approaches in future biological monitoring of MIC and MIC mitigation strategies in general. IMPORTANCE Microbially influenced corrosion (MIC) has been estimated to contribute 20 to 50% of the costs associated with corrosion globally. Diagnosis and monitoring of MIC are complex problems requiring knowledge of corrosion rates, corrosion morphology, and the associated microbiology to distinguish MIC from abiotic corrosion processes. Historically, biological monitoring of MIC utilized a priori knowledge to monitor sulfate-reducing bacteria; however, it is becoming widely accepted that a holistic or community-level understanding of corrosion-associated microbiology is needed for MIC diagnosis and monitoring. Before biology associated with MIC attack can be identified, standardized protocols for sampling and monitoring must be developed. The significance of our research is in contributing to the development of robust and repeatable sampling strategies of bilges, which are required for the development of standardized biological monitoring methods for MIC. We achieve this via a biodiversity survey of bilge communities and by comparing taxonomic and functional variation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA; MIC; SRB; bilge; biocorrosion; biomonitoring; microbial community; microbial corrosion; sulfate-reducing bacteria

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34232755      PMCID: PMC8388792          DOI: 10.1128/AEM.00890-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol        ISSN: 0099-2240            Impact factor:   4.792


  26 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of putative biocorroding microbiota with a novel niche detection of Epsilon- and Zetaproteobacteria in Pacific Ocean coastal seawaters.

Authors:  Hongyue Dang; Ruipeng Chen; Lin Wang; Sudong Shao; Lingqing Dai; Ying Ye; Lizhong Guo; Guiqiao Huang; Martin G Klotz
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 2.  Microbial Surface Colonization and Biofilm Development in Marine Environments.

Authors:  Hongyue Dang; Charles R Lovell
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2015-12-23       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Colloquium paper: resistance, resilience, and redundancy in microbial communities.

Authors:  Steven D Allison; Jennifer B H Martiny
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-08-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  The dual role of microbes in corrosion.

Authors:  Nardy Kip; Johannes A van Veen
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 10.302

5.  16S rRNA gene profiling of planktonic and biofilm microbial populations in the Gulf of Guinea using Illumina NGS.

Authors:  Sukriye Celikkol-Aydin; Christine C Gaylarde; Tim Lee; Robert E Melchers; Devin L Witt; Iwona B Beech
Journal:  Mar Environ Res       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.130

6.  Desulfosporosinus meridiei sp. nov., a spore-forming sulfate-reducing bacterium isolated from gasolene-contaminated groundwater.

Authors:  W J Robertson; J P Bowman; P D Franzmann; B J Mee
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.747

7.  454 pyrosequencing analyses of bacterial and archaeal richness in 21 full-scale biogas digesters.

Authors:  Carina Sundberg; Waleed A Al-Soud; Madeleine Larsson; Erik Alm; Sepehr S Yekta; Bo H Svensson; Søren J Sørensen; Anna Karlsson
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2013-06-12       Impact factor: 4.194

8.  DADA2: High-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data.

Authors:  Benjamin J Callahan; Paul J McMurdie; Michael J Rosen; Andrew W Han; Amy Jo A Johnson; Susan P Holmes
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 9.  Trait-based approaches for understanding microbial biodiversity and ecosystem functioning.

Authors:  Sascha Krause; Xavier Le Roux; Pascal A Niklaus; Peter M Van Bodegom; Jay T Lennon; Stefan Bertilsson; Hans-Peter Grossart; Laurent Philippot; Paul L E Bodelier
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data.

Authors:  Paul J McMurdie; Susan Holmes
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.