Literature DB >> 34230556

The effect of deadlines on cancer screening completion: a randomized controlled trial.

Alicea Lieberman1, Ayelet Gneezy2, Emily Berry3, Stacie Miller3, Mark Koch4, Keith E Argenbright3,5,6, Samir Gupta7,8.   

Abstract

Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States. Although screening facilitates prevention and early detection and is one of the most effective approaches to reducing cancer mortality, participation is low-particularly among underserved populations. In a large, preregistered field experiment (n = 7711), we tested whether deadlines-both with and without monetary incentives tied to them-increase colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. We found that all screening invitations with an imposed deadline increased completion, ranging from 2.5% to 7.3% relative to control (ps < .004). Most importantly, individuals who received a short deadline with no incentive were as likely to complete screening (9.7%) as those whose invitation included a deadline coupled with either a small (9.1%) or large declining financial incentive (12.0%; ps = .57 and .04, respectively). These results suggest that merely imposing deadlines-especially short ones-can significantly increase CRC screening completion, and may also have implications for other forms of cancer screening.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34230556     DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-93334-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Rep        ISSN: 2045-2322            Impact factor:   4.379


  20 in total

1.  The nature of procrastination: a meta-analytic and theoretical review of quintessential self-regulatory failure.

Authors:  Piers Steel
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Cancer statistics, 2019.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Screening for colorectal cancer by faecal occult blood test: why people choose to refuse.

Authors:  D L Worthley; S R Cole; A Esterman; S Mehaffey; N M Roosa; A Smith; D Turnbull; G P Young
Journal:  Intern Med J       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.048

4.  Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Kirsten Bibbins-Domingo; David C Grossman; Susan J Curry; Karina W Davidson; John W Epling; Francisco A R García; Matthew W Gillman; Diane M Harper; Alex R Kemper; Alex H Krist; Ann E Kurth; C Seth Landefeld; Carol M Mangione; Douglas K Owens; William R Phillips; Maureen G Phipps; Michael P Pignone; Albert L Siu
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Resource slack and propensity to discount delayed investments of time versus money.

Authors:  Gal Zauberman; John G Lynch
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2005-02

6.  Mailed Outreach Is Superior to Usual Care Alone for Colorectal Cancer Screening in the USA: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mark Jager; Josh Demb; Ali Asghar; Kevin Selby; Evelyn Marquez Mello; Karen M Heskett; Alicea J Lieberman; Zhuo Geng; Balambal Bharti; Siddharth Singh; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.199

7.  Comparative effectiveness of fecal immunochemical test outreach, colonoscopy outreach, and usual care for boosting colorectal cancer screening among the underserved: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Samir Gupta; Ethan A Halm; Don C Rockey; Marcia Hammons; Mark Koch; Elizabeth Carter; Luisa Valdez; Liyue Tong; Chul Ahn; Michael Kashner; Keith Argenbright; Jasmin Tiro; Zhuo Geng; Sandi Pruitt; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 21.873

8.  Outreach invitations for FIT and colonoscopy improve colorectal cancer screening rates: A randomized controlled trial in a safety-net health system.

Authors:  Amit G Singal; Samir Gupta; Jasmin A Tiro; Celette Sugg Skinner; Katharine McCallister; Joanne M Sanders; Wendy Pechero Bishop; Deepak Agrawal; Christian A Mayorga; Chul Ahn; Adam C Loewen; Noel O Santini; Ethan A Halm
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study.

Authors:  Nancy P Gordon; Beverly B Green
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-06-11       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Reasons for never and intermittent completion of colorectal cancer screening after receiving multiple rounds of mailed fecal tests.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; June BlueSpruce; Leah Tuzzio; Sally W Vernon; L Aubree Shay; Sheryl L Catz
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 3.295

View more
  1 in total

1.  Financial Literacy, Financial Education, and Cancer Screening Behavior: Evidence from Japan.

Authors:  Trinh Xuan Thi Nguyen; Sumeet Lal; Sulemana Abdul-Salam; Mostafa Saidur Rahim Khan; Yoshihiko Kadoya
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 4.614

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.