Kasama Pooseesod1,2, Daniel M Parker3, Natthani Meemon4, Saranath Lawpoolsri1, Pratap Singhasivanon1,5, Jetsumon Sattabongkot6, Liwang Cui7, Suparat Phuanukoonnon8,9. 1. Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. 2. Faculty of Public Health, Thammasat University, Bangkok, Thailand. 3. Department of Population Health & Disease Prevention, Program in Public Health Susan and Henry Samueli College of Health Sciences, University of California, Irvine, USA. 4. Department of Society and Health, Faculty of Social Sciences and Humanities, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. 5. Faculty of Tropical Medicine, SEAMEO TROPMED Regional Centre for Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. 6. Mahidol Vivax Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. 7. Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. 8. Department of Tropical Hygiene, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. suparat.phu@mahidol.ac.th. 9. Department of Social and Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University, Nakhon Pathom, Thailand. suparat.phu@mahidol.ac.th.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: With the goal for malaria elimination in Thailand set for 2024, increased coverage and utilization of bed net, especially insecticide-treated net (ITN) or long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) is a key strategy. This study aims to provide the necessary information about bed net ownership and utilization among the population at risk of malaria living along the Thai-Myanmar border in Tak province. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a mixed-method approach in 331 households from 5 hamlets in the villages of the Thai-Myanmar border. The research tools included a questionnaire, bed net inspection, and semi-structured interviews. Logistic regression was used to explore the sociodemographic factors associated with bed net utilization. The qualitative analysis employed a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: This survey found that 98.5% of households had at least one bed net per household, and 74.3% had at least one ITN/LLIN. However, only 30.8% of households reached the standard policy set by the Minister of Public Health of one ITN/LLINs per two persons. Most residents used bed net (92.1% used in the previous night and 80.9% used every day). For those using bed nets, however, 61.9% used ITNs or LLINs the night before and 53.1% used them every day. Nonetheless, the usage rates of bed nets (any type) in the previous night among children and pregnant women were high, reaching 95.3% and 90.0%, respectively. Seven explanatory variables showed statistically significant associations with bed net use every day, including: "not staying overnight in the forest or the field", "sleeping pattern based on gender", "sufficient numbers of bed nets to cover all sleeping spaces", "preference for free bed nets", "age", "gender", and "SES score" showed statistically significant association with bed net use every day. The major reasons for the regular use of bed nets in both household and the forest were to prevent mosquito biting. The reasons for not using bednets in the household were discomfort feelings from heat, perception of unnecessity due to low mosquito density, whereas the reason for not using bed nets in the forest was inconvenience. CONCLUSION: Despite that overall coverage and usage of bed nets was high, only one third reached the standard level specified by the policy. Overnight in the forest, the dissatisfaction with the quality of free bed nets, insufficient number of bed nets, sleeping alone, male gender, age more than 10 years, low socioeconomic status, discomfort from heat, perception of no benefits of bed nets due to low mosquito density, and inconvenience were factors influencing bed net use. Maintaining high coverage and utility rate of bed nets should be a priority for the malaria high-risk population.
BACKGROUND: With the goal for malaria elimination in Thailand set for 2024, increased coverage and utilization of bed net, especially insecticide-treated net (ITN) or long-lasting insecticidal net (LLIN) is a key strategy. This study aims to provide the necessary information about bed net ownership and utilization among the population at risk of malaria living along the Thai-Myanmar border in Tak province. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted using a mixed-method approach in 331 households from 5 hamlets in the villages of the Thai-Myanmar border. The research tools included a questionnaire, bed net inspection, and semi-structured interviews. Logistic regression was used to explore the sociodemographic factors associated with bed net utilization. The qualitative analysis employed a thematic analysis approach. RESULTS: This survey found that 98.5% of households had at least one bed net per household, and 74.3% had at least one ITN/LLIN. However, only 30.8% of households reached the standard policy set by the Minister of Public Health of one ITN/LLINs per two persons. Most residents used bed net (92.1% used in the previous night and 80.9% used every day). For those using bed nets, however, 61.9% used ITNs or LLINs the night before and 53.1% used them every day. Nonetheless, the usage rates of bed nets (any type) in the previous night among children and pregnant women were high, reaching 95.3% and 90.0%, respectively. Seven explanatory variables showed statistically significant associations with bed net use every day, including: "not staying overnight in the forest or the field", "sleeping pattern based on gender", "sufficient numbers of bed nets to cover all sleeping spaces", "preference for free bed nets", "age", "gender", and "SES score" showed statistically significant association with bed net use every day. The major reasons for the regular use of bed nets in both household and the forest were to prevent mosquito biting. The reasons for not using bednets in the household were discomfort feelings from heat, perception of unnecessity due to low mosquito density, whereas the reason for not using bed nets in the forest was inconvenience. CONCLUSION: Despite that overall coverage and usage of bed nets was high, only one third reached the standard level specified by the policy. Overnight in the forest, the dissatisfaction with the quality of free bed nets, insufficient number of bed nets, sleeping alone, male gender, age more than 10 years, low socioeconomic status, discomfort from heat, perception of no benefits of bed nets due to low mosquito density, and inconvenience were factors influencing bed net use. Maintaining high coverage and utility rate of bed nets should be a priority for the malaria high-risk population.
Authors: Marianne E Sinka; Michael J Bangs; Sylvie Manguin; Theeraphap Chareonviriyaphap; Anand P Patil; William H Temperley; Peter W Gething; Iqbal R F Elyazar; Caroline W Kabaria; Ralph E Harbach; Simon I Hay Journal: Parasit Vectors Date: 2011-05-25 Impact factor: 3.876
Authors: Mateusz M Plucinski; Silvia Chicuecue; Eusébio Macete; James Colborn; Steven S Yoon; S Patrick Kachur; Pedro Aide; Pedro Alonso; Caterina Guinovart; Juliette Morgan Journal: Malar J Date: 2014-11-05 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Mattimi Passah; Carinthia Balabet Nengnong; Mark L Wilson; Jane M Carlton; Larry Kharbamon; Sandra Albert Journal: Malar J Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 3.469
Authors: Mohd Amirul Fitri A Rahim; Sriwipa Chuangchaiya; Paisit Chanpum; Laun Palawong; Panuwat Kantee; Nor Diyana Dian; Inke Nadia D Lubis; Paul C S Divis; Akira Kaneko; Kevin K A Tetteh; Zulkarnain Md Idris Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 6.073