Katherine Theiss-Nyland1, Diakalia Koné2, Corine Karema3,4, Waqo Ejersa5, Jayne Webster6, Jo Lines6. 1. Infectious Disease Epidemiology Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK. 2. Programme National de Lutte Contre le Paludisme, Ministere de la Sante et l'Hygiene Publique, Bamako, Mali. 3. Epidemiology and Public Health, Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Basel, Switzerland. 4. University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland. 5. Malaria Control Unit, Ministry of Health, Nairobi, Kenya. 6. Disease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The continuous distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for malaria prevention, through the antenatal care (ANC) and the Expanded Programme on Immunizations (EPI), is recommended by the WHO to improve and maintain LLIN coverage. Despite these recommendations, little is known about the relative strengths and weaknesses of the ANC and EPI-based LLIN distribution. This study aimed to explore and compare the roles of the ANC and EPI for LLIN distribution in four African countries. METHODS: In a qualitative evaluation of continuous distribution through the ANC and EPI, semi-structured, individual and group interviews were conducted in Kenya, Malawi, Mali, and Rwanda. Respondents included national, sub-national, and facility-level health staff, and were selected to capture a range of roles related to malaria, ANC and EPI programmes. Policies, guidelines, and data collection tools were reviewed as a means of triangulation to assess the structure of LLIN distribution, and the methods of data collection and reporting for malaria, ANC and EPI programmes. RESULTS: In the four countries visited, distribution of LLINs was more effectively integrated through ANC than through EPI because of a) stronger linkages and involvement between malaria and reproductive health programmes, as compared to malaria and EPI, and b) more complete programme monitoring for ANC-based distribution, compared to EPI-based distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities for improving the distribution of LLINs through these channels exist, especially in the case of EPI. For both ANC and EPI, integrated distribution of LLINs has the potential to act as an incentive, improving the already strong coverage of both these essential services. The collection and reporting of data on LLINs distributed through the ANC and EPI can provide insight into the performance of LLIN distribution within these programmes. Greater attention to data collection and use, by both the global malaria community, and the integrated programmes, can improve this distribution channel strength and effectiveness. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
BACKGROUND: The continuous distribution of long-lasting insecticidal nets (LLINs) for malaria prevention, through the antenatal care (ANC) and the Expanded Programme on Immunizations (EPI), is recommended by the WHO to improve and maintain LLIN coverage. Despite these recommendations, little is known about the relative strengths and weaknesses of the ANC and EPI-based LLIN distribution. This study aimed to explore and compare the roles of the ANC and EPI for LLIN distribution in four African countries. METHODS: In a qualitative evaluation of continuous distribution through the ANC and EPI, semi-structured, individual and group interviews were conducted in Kenya, Malawi, Mali, and Rwanda. Respondents included national, sub-national, and facility-level health staff, and were selected to capture a range of roles related to malaria, ANC and EPI programmes. Policies, guidelines, and data collection tools were reviewed as a means of triangulation to assess the structure of LLIN distribution, and the methods of data collection and reporting for malaria, ANC and EPI programmes. RESULTS: In the four countries visited, distribution of LLINs was more effectively integrated through ANC than through EPI because of a) stronger linkages and involvement between malaria and reproductive health programmes, as compared to malaria and EPI, and b) more complete programme monitoring for ANC-based distribution, compared to EPI-based distribution. CONCLUSIONS: Opportunities for improving the distribution of LLINs through these channels exist, especially in the case of EPI. For both ANC and EPI, integrated distribution of LLINs has the potential to act as an incentive, improving the already strong coverage of both these essential services. The collection and reporting of data on LLINs distributed through the ANC and EPI can provide insight into the performance of LLIN distribution within these programmes. Greater attention to data collection and use, by both the global malaria community, and the integrated programmes, can improve this distribution channel strength and effectiveness. Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Authors: Verner N Orish; Raymond Saa-Eru Maalman; Otchere Y Donkor; Barbara Yordanis Henandez Ceruantes; Eric Osei; Hubert Amu; Prince Kubi Appiah; Kennedy Diema Konlan; Hadiru Mumuni; Eunji Kim; Siwoo Kim; Hajun Jung; Jones Ofori-Amoah; Philip Kofie; Martin Adjuik; Robert Kaba Alhassan; Ernestina Safoa Donkor; Francis Bruno Zottor; Margaret Kweku; Paul Amuna; So Yoo Kim; John Owusu Gyapong Journal: Malar J Date: 2021-11-27 Impact factor: 2.979
Authors: Mohd Amirul Fitri A Rahim; Sriwipa Chuangchaiya; Paisit Chanpum; Laun Palawong; Panuwat Kantee; Nor Diyana Dian; Inke Nadia D Lubis; Paul C S Divis; Akira Kaneko; Kevin K A Tetteh; Zulkarnain Md Idris Journal: Front Cell Infect Microbiol Date: 2022-08-22 Impact factor: 6.073