Kira L Ryskina1, Kaitlyn Shultz1, Yi Zhou2, Gillian Lautenbach1, Rebecca T Brown2,3,4,5. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 2. Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 3. Division of Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 4. Geriatrics and Extended Care Program, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA. 5. Center for Health Equity Research and Promotion, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In 2020, primary care practices adopted telemedicine as an alternative to in-person visits. Little is known about whether access to telemedicine was equitable, especially among older patients. Our objectives were to (1) examine older adults' use of telemedicine versus in-person primary care visits and (2) compare hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) between the groups. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study of 17,103 patients aged ≥65 years seen at 32 clinics in the Mid-Atlantic, primary care patients were classified into two groups-telemedicine versus in person-based on the first visit between March and May 2020 and followed up for 14 days. Using multivariable logistic regression, we measured the odds of being seen via telemedicine versus in person as a function of patient demographics, comorbidities, and week of study period. We then measured the odds of ACSC hospitalization by visit modality. RESULTS: Mean age was 75.1 years (SD, 7.5), 60.6% of patients were female, 64.6% white, 28.1% black, and 2.0% Hispanic. Overall, 60.3% of patients accessed primary care via telemedicine. Black (vs. white) patients had higher odds of using telemedicine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14-1.47) and Hispanic (vs. not Hispanic) patients had lower odds (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.92). Compared with the in-person group, patients in the telemedicine group had lower odds of ACSC hospitalization (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-1.00). Among patients who used telemedicine, black patients had 1.43 higher odds of ACSC hospitalization (95% CI, 1.02-2.01) compared with white patients. Patients aged 85 or older seen via telemedicine had higher odds of an ACSC hospitalization (aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03-2.47) compared with patients aged 65-74. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of telemedicine for primary care access for older adults. However, the observed disparities highlight the need to improve care quality and equity regardless of visit modality.
BACKGROUND: In 2020, primary care practices adopted telemedicine as an alternative to in-person visits. Little is known about whether access to telemedicine was equitable, especially among older patients. Our objectives were to (1) examine older adults' use of telemedicine versus in-person primary care visits and (2) compare hospitalization for ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSCs) between the groups. METHODS: In this retrospective cross-sectional study of 17,103 patients aged ≥65 years seen at 32 clinics in the Mid-Atlantic, primary care patients were classified into two groups-telemedicine versus in person-based on the first visit between March and May 2020 and followed up for 14 days. Using multivariable logistic regression, we measured the odds of being seen via telemedicine versus in person as a function of patient demographics, comorbidities, and week of study period. We then measured the odds of ACSC hospitalization by visit modality. RESULTS: Mean age was 75.1 years (SD, 7.5), 60.6% of patients were female, 64.6% white, 28.1% black, and 2.0% Hispanic. Overall, 60.3% of patients accessed primary care via telemedicine. Black (vs. white) patients had higher odds of using telemedicine (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.30; 95% CI, 1.14-1.47) and Hispanic (vs. not Hispanic) patients had lower odds (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.42-0.92). Compared with the in-person group, patients in the telemedicine group had lower odds of ACSC hospitalization (aOR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.61-1.00). Among patients who used telemedicine, black patients had 1.43 higher odds of ACSC hospitalization (95% CI, 1.02-2.01) compared with white patients. Patients aged 85 or older seen via telemedicine had higher odds of an ACSC hospitalization (aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.03-2.47) compared with patients aged 65-74. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the use of telemedicine for primary care access for older adults. However, the observed disparities highlight the need to improve care quality and equity regardless of visit modality.
Authors: Sadiq Y Patel; Ateev Mehrotra; Haiden A Huskamp; Lori Uscher-Pines; Ishani Ganguli; Michael L Barnett Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2020-11-16 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Lauren A Eberly; Michael J Kallan; Howard M Julien; Norrisa Haynes; Sameed Ahmed M Khatana; Ashwin S Nathan; Christopher Snider; Neel P Chokshi; Nwamaka D Eneanya; Samuel U Takvorian; Rebecca Anastos-Wallen; Krisda Chaiyachati; Marietta Ambrose; Rupal O'Quinn; Matthew Seigerman; Lee R Goldberg; Damien Leri; Katherine Choi; Yevginiy Gitelman; Daniel M Kolansky; Thomas P Cappola; Victor A Ferrari; C William Hanson; Mary Elizabeth Deleener; Srinath Adusumalli Journal: JAMA Netw Open Date: 2020-12-01
Authors: Demetria M McNeal; Kelty Fehling; P Michael Ho; Peter Kaboli; Stephanie Shimada; Sameer D Saini; Bradley Youles; Karen Albright Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2022-03-29 Impact factor: 6.473
Authors: Ryan N Hansen; Basil Matthew Saour; Brian Serafini; Blake Hannaford; Lanu Kim; Takayoshi Kohno; Ryan James; Wayne Monsky; Stephen P Seslar Journal: Telemed J E Health Date: 2021-11-19 Impact factor: 5.033
Authors: Alessandro Paro; Daniel R Rice; J Madison Hyer; Elizabeth Palmer; Aslam Ejaz; Chanza Fahim Shaikh; Timothy M Pawlik Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 4.339