| Literature DB >> 34224037 |
Mohammad Malakootian1,2, Ali Toolabi3, Saeed Hosseini1.
Abstract
Biological aerated filters (BAFs) have high filtration efficiency due to their tolerance of hydraulic and organic shocks are suitable for the treatment of complex and sanitary wastewater. In this study, for the first time, natural media of date kernel from Bam city was used as the BAF reactor media, with a meshing sand filter separated by a standard metal grid from the natural filter section used at the end of the reactor. This can be considered an innovation in the media and filtration. Aeration in the related reactor with 160 cm height was performed bilaterally as up-flow and continuously by nozzles throughout the reactor media. In this work, the actual effluent of the hospital wastewater treatment plant was employed as the inflow wastewater to the reactor, and its organic and inorganic parameters were measured before and after the treatment by the BAF reactor. The backwashing process was also studied in three ways: bottom backwashing (TB), top backwashing (BB), and top and bottom backwashing (TBBS), to determine the amount of water consumed and to achieve the desired result. According to the results obtained in this study, the removal efficiencies of inorganic and microbial contaminants, amoxicillin and azithromycin were obtained as follows: BOD5: 98.48%, COD: 92.42%, [Formula: see text]: 99.4%, P: 93.3%, Coliforms: 97%, Color: 42.8%, Turbidity: 95%, Sulphate: 30%, TSS: 98.9%, Amoxicillin: 20% and azithromycin: 13%. In the backwashing process, the amount of water consumed in these three TB, BB, and TBBS methods were obtained 300, 164, and 118 L, respectively, So, TBBS method was selected as the optimal method. Based on the results obtained in this study, it is concluded that the BAF process with natural date kernel has a high efficiency in removing organic and inorganic contaminants from hospital wastewater, also the concentration of most of the effluent parameters was less or in accordance with EPA standard.Entities:
Keywords: Backwashing; Biological aerated filters; Hospital wastewaters; Natural media
Year: 2021 PMID: 34224037 PMCID: PMC8257852 DOI: 10.1186/s13568-021-01260-2
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AMB Express ISSN: 2191-0855 Impact factor: 3.298
Characteristics of raw wastewater and effluent from wastewater treatment plant
| Parameter | Mean raw wastewater | EPA standards | Mean effluent |
|---|---|---|---|
| pH | 7.8 | 6–9 | 8.1 |
| Temperature | 20 ± 19 | – | 2 ± 18 |
| TSS (mg/L) | 15 ± 970 | 5 | 5 ± 90 |
| DO (mg/L) | 20 ± 0.75 | 2 | 2 ± 2 |
| BOD5 (mg/L) | 20 ± 320 | 10 | 15 ± 100 |
| COD (mg/L) | 25 ± 440 | 100 | 15 ± 198 |
| 10 ± 76 | 50 | 5 ± 30 | |
| 12 ± 45 | 6 | 5 ± 30 | |
| Turbidity (NTU) | – | 50 | 2 ± 10 |
| Color (TCU) | 45 ± 890 | 550 | 5 ± 105 |
| Sulfate (mg/L) | 57 ± 1050 | 1500 | 20 ± 600 |
| Coliforms (MPN) | 1000 ± 1 × 107 | 1000 | 100 ± 1660 |
| Amoxicillin (mg/L) | 3 ± 15 | – | 3 ± 10 |
| Azithromycin (mg/L) | 20 ± 3 | – | 0.3 ± 1.5 |
Reactor hydraulic properties
| Parameter | Unit | Value |
|---|---|---|
| Hydraulic retention time | min | 60 |
| Wastewater flow rate | L/m2 s | 0.22 |
| Back wash flow rate | L/m2 s | 1.6 |
| Flow rate of aeration pump | L/m2 s | 0.9 |
| Reverse aeration pump flow rate | L/m2 s | 7.3 |
| Average organic loading | Kg COD/m3 d | 0.76 |
| Mean dissolved oxygen | mg/L | 5 |
| Inlet discharge to the reactor | mL/L | 100 |
Fig. 1Schematic of the BAF reactor (1. Wastewater Inlet 2. Primary settling tank 3. Wastewater inlet line 4. Reactor chamber 5. Sample valves 6. Secondary settling tank 7. Return sludge line 8. Sand filter 9. One-way valve 10. Effluent Valve 11. Backwash pump 12. Piezometer 13. Aeration pump 14. Aeration regulator)
Physico-chemical properties of date kernels
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Ash content % | 1.52 |
| Moisture % | 2.33 |
| Volatile content % | 65.4 ± 3.5 |
| Fixed carbon content % | 25 ± 3 |
| C % | 28 |
| N % | 0.8 |
| Fat % | 12 |
| Particle density Kg/m3 | 650 |
| Prosity % | 24 |
| Total carbohydrate % | 79.33 |
| Crude Fiber % | 26.18 |
| Protein % | 4.44 |
| pH | 4.7 ± 0.3 |
BET Plot of date kernel
| Parameter | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| 0.2304 | [cm3(STP) g−1] | |
| as,BET | 1.0029 | [m2 g−1] |
| 67.951 | ||
| Total pore volume ( | 0.0023731 | [cm3 g−1] |
| Mean pore diameter | 9.4649 | [nm] |
Fig. 2FESEM of date kernel media
Results of biological filtration by date kernels
| Parameter | Inlet wastewater to the reactor | Average output of the reactor at a height of 25 cm | Average output of the reactor at a height of 50 cm | Average output of the reactor at a height of 75 cm | Average output of the reactor at a height of 100 cm | Average output from drain valve reactor | Average final removal percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PH | 8.1 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 8.1 | 0.5 ± 8.1 | 1 ± 7 | – |
| DO (mg/L) | 2 | 0.2 ± 5 | 0.3 ± 5 | 0.3 ± 5 | 0.3 ± 5 | 0.3 ± 5 | – |
| 5 ± 100 | 5 ± 80 | 5 ± 50 | 5 ± 20 | 5 ± 10 | 0.6 ± 3 | 98.48 | |
| COD (mg/L) | 10 ± 198 | 10 ± 150 | 7 ± 70 | 5 ± 30 | 5 ± 20 | 3 ± 15 | 92.42 |
| 5 ± 30 | 2 ± 20 | 1.5 ± 15 | 1 ± 8 | 0.5 ± 3 | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 99.4 | |
| 3 ± 15 | 2 ± 10 | 1.5 ± 8 | 1 ± 4 | 0.8 ± 2 | 0.3 ± 1 | 93.3 | |
| Turbidity (NTU) | 0.5 ± 10 | 0.5 ± 9 | 0.5 ± 8 | 0.5 ± 7 | 0.5 ± 6 | 0.5 | 95 |
| Color (TCU) | 10 ± 105 | 10 ± 100 | 10 ± 80 | 10 ± 75 | 10 ± 65 | 10 ± 60 | 42.8 |
| Sulfate (mg/L) | 80 ± 600 | 80 ± 580 | 80 ± 480 | 80 ± 450 | 60 ± 430 | 50 ± 420 | 30 |
| TSS (mg/L) | 0.2 ± 90 | 0.2 ± 40 | 0.2 ± 22 | 0.2 ± 15 | 0.2 ± 9 | 0.2 ± 1 | 98.9 |
| ORP (mv) | + 10 | + 50 | + 85 | + 120 | + 200 | + 214 | – |
| Amoxicillin (mg/L) | 3 ± 10 | – | – | – | – | 1 ± 8 | 20 |
| Azithromycin (mg/L) | 0.3 ± 1.5 | – | – | – | – | 0.05 ± 1.3 | 13 |
Properties of effluent backwashing return to the reactor
| Method | BOD (mg/L) | COD (mg/L) | TSS(mg/L) | Turbidity (NTU) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reactor output without return | 3 | 15 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Reactor output with TB rotation | 2 | 13 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Reactor output with BB rotation | 2 | 13 | 1 | 0.5 |
| Reactor output with TBBS rotation | 2 | 12 | 1 | 0.5 |