Literature DB >> 34223893

Ethnography and user-centered design to inform context-driven implementation.

Emily R Haines1, M Alexis Kirk2, Lauren Lux3, Andrew B Smitherman4, Byron J Powell5, Alex Dopp6, Angela M Stover7, Sarah A Birken8.   

Abstract

Despite pervasive findings pointing to its inextricable role in intervention implementation, context remains poorly understood in implementation science. Existing approaches for describing context (e.g., surveys, interviews) may be narrow in scope or superficial in their elicitation of contextual data. Thus, in-depth and multilevel approaches are needed to meaningfully describe the contexts into which interventions will be implemented. Moreover, many studies assess context without subsequently using contextual information to enhance implementation. To be useful for improving implementation, though, methods are needed to apply contextual information during implementation. In the case example presented in this paper, we embedded an ethnographic assessment of context within a user-centered design approach to describe implementation context and apply that information to promote implementation. We developed a patient-reported outcome measure-based clinical intervention to assess and address the pervasive unmet needs of young adults with cancer: the Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB). In this paper, we describe the user-centered design process that we used to anticipate context modifications needed to deliver NA-SB and implementation strategies needed to facilitate its implementation. Our ethnographic contextual inquiry yielded a rich understanding of local implementation context and contextual variation across potential scale-up contexts. Other methods from user-centered design (i.e., translation tables and a design team prototyping workshop) allowed us to translate that information into specifications for NA-SB delivery and a plan for implementation. Embedding ethnographic methods within a user-centered design approach can help us to tailor interventions and implementation strategies to their contexts of use to promote implementation. © Society of Behavioral Medicine 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Context; Context assessment; Ethnography; Evidence-based practice implementation; Human-centered design; User-centered design

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34223893      PMCID: PMC8826991          DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab077

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Behav Med        ISSN: 1613-9860            Impact factor:   3.626


  45 in total

Review 1.  Use of qualitative methods in published health services and management research: a 10-year review.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner; Halle R Amick; Jennifer L Lund; Shoou-Yih Daniel Lee; Timothy J Hoff
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2010-07-30       Impact factor: 3.929

2.  'Workers', 'clients' and the struggle over needs: understanding encounters between service providers and injecting drug users in an Australian city.

Authors:  David Moore
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2009-01-21       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Context matters: the experience of 14 research teams in systematically reporting contextual factors important for practice change.

Authors:  Andrada Tomoaia-Cotisel; Debra L Scammon; Norman J Waitzman; Peter F Cronholm; Jacqueline R Halladay; David L Driscoll; Leif I Solberg; Clarissa Hsu; Ming Tai-Seale; Vanessa Hiratsuka; Sarah C Shih; Michael D Fetters; Christopher G Wise; Jeffrey A Alexander; Diane Hauser; Carmit K McMullen; Sarah Hudson Scholle; Manasi A Tirodkar; Laura Schmidt; Katrina E Donahue; Michael L Parchman; Kurt C Stange
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.166

4.  Development and implementation of a patient reported outcome intervention (QLIC-ON PROfile) in clinical paediatric oncology practice.

Authors:  Vivian Engelen; Lotte Haverman; Hendrik Koopman; Netteke Schouten-van Meeteren; Esther Meijer-van den Bergh; Jantien Vrijmoet-Wiersma; Elisabeth Maria van Dijk; Bob Last; Symone Detmar; Martha Grootenhuis
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2010-03-01

5.  A glossary of user-centered design strategies for implementation experts.

Authors:  Alex R Dopp; Kathryn E Parisi; Sean A Munson; Aaron R Lyon
Journal:  Transl Behav Med       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  The relationship between unmet needs and distress amongst young people with cancer.

Authors:  Gavin J Dyson; Kate Thompson; Susan Palmer; David M Thomas; Penelope Schofield
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 7.  Patients' needs assessment in cancer care: a review of assessment tools.

Authors:  Alison Richardson; Jibby Medina; Vivienne Brown; John Sitzia
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2007-01-19       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 8.  The influence of context on the effectiveness of hospital quality improvement strategies: a review of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Dionne S Kringos; Rosa Sunol; Cordula Wagner; Russell Mannion; Philippe Michel; Niek S Klazinga; Oliver Groene
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-07-22       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Designing eHealth that Matters via a Multidisciplinary Requirements Development Approach.

Authors:  Lex Van Velsen; Jobke Wentzel; Julia Ewc Van Gemert-Pijnen
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2013-06-24

Review 10.  Using ethnography in implementation research to improve nutrition interventions in populations.

Authors:  Alison Tumilowicz; Lynnette M Neufeld; Gretel H Pelto
Journal:  Matern Child Nutr       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 3.092

View more
  1 in total

1.  Unraveling implementation context: the Basel Approach for coNtextual ANAlysis (BANANA) in implementation science and its application in the SMILe project.

Authors:  Juliane Mielke; Lynn Leppla; Sabine Valenta; Leah L Zullig; Franziska Zúñiga; Sandra Staudacher; Alexandra Teynor; Sabina De Geest
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-10-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.