PURPOSE: Most psychosocial research in cancer has been restricted to paediatric or older adult populations. This study aimed to explore psychological distress and unmet needs in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer and identify predictors of distress among demographic and illness characteristics and supportive care needs. METHODS: Fifty-three patients between 16 and 30 years completed a cross-sectional survey, administered shortly after presentation to an AYA oncology service and within 4 months of diagnosis. Measures included the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Form (STAI-S) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey. Level of distress-related sypmtomatology in this population was based on previous work, whereby a cut-off score of 4 or greater was used for the BDI-FS, and one standard deviation above the sample population mean was used for the STAI-S. RESULTS: Prevalence of distress (25%) was lower than that found previously in AYA with cancer. Physical and daily living needs were the most frequently unmet needs overall, followed by psychological needs, health system and information needs and care and support needs. Lastly, being pre-treatment predicted increased depression and state anxiety, while having treatment post-surgery predicted reduced state anxiety. After controlling for treatment status, however, the main predictors of depression and state anxiety were physical and daily living needs and health system and information needs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lower levels of distress and unmet psychological needs were related to the few participants (17%) in this study who were pre-treatment, when distress was most likely. However, physical needs and information needs, which are almost inevitable throughout treatment and beyond, were more important predictors of distress. Further exploration must consider the psychosocial difficulties underlying this association and the needs of AYA at transitions between critical periods in their cancer journey (i.e., upon diagnosis, during treatment, etc.).
PURPOSE: Most psychosocial research in cancer has been restricted to paediatric or older adult populations. This study aimed to explore psychological distress and unmet needs in adolescents and young adults (AYA) with cancer and identify predictors of distress among demographic and illness characteristics and supportive care needs. METHODS: Fifty-three patients between 16 and 30 years completed a cross-sectional survey, administered shortly after presentation to an AYA oncology service and within 4 months of diagnosis. Measures included the Beck Depression Inventory-Fast Screen (BDI-FS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State Form (STAI-S) and the Supportive Care Needs Survey. Level of distress-related sypmtomatology in this population was based on previous work, whereby a cut-off score of 4 or greater was used for the BDI-FS, and one standard deviation above the sample population mean was used for the STAI-S. RESULTS: Prevalence of distress (25%) was lower than that found previously in AYA with cancer. Physical and daily living needs were the most frequently unmet needs overall, followed by psychological needs, health system and information needs and care and support needs. Lastly, being pre-treatment predicted increased depression and state anxiety, while having treatment post-surgery predicted reduced state anxiety. After controlling for treatment status, however, the main predictors of depression and state anxiety were physical and daily living needs and health system and information needs, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Lower levels of distress and unmet psychological needs were related to the few participants (17%) in this study who were pre-treatment, when distress was most likely. However, physical needs and information needs, which are almost inevitable throughout treatment and beyond, were more important predictors of distress. Further exploration must consider the psychosocial difficulties underlying this association and the needs of AYA at transitions between critical periods in their cancer journey (i.e., upon diagnosis, during treatment, etc.).
Authors: Mariann Hedström; Anders Kreuger; Gustaf Ljungman; Peter Nygren; Louise von Essen Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Marina Servitzoglou; Danai Papadatou; Ioannis Tsiantis; Helen Vasilatou-Kosmidis Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2007-06-12 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Pamela S Hinds; Catherine A Billups; Xueyuan Cao; Jami S Gattuso; Elizabeth Burghen; Nancy West; Jeffrey E Rubnitz; Najat C Daw Journal: Eur J Oncol Nurs Date: 2008-10-15 Impact factor: 2.398
Authors: Brad J Zebrack; Lonnie K Zeltzer; John Whitton; Ann C Mertens; Lorrie Odom; Roger Berkow; Leslie L Robison Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 9.703
Authors: Susan M Sawyer; Robyn McNeil; Maria McCarthy; Lisa Orme; Kate Thompson; Sarah Drew; David Dunt Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2017-03-06 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: Alex W K Wong; Ting-Ting Chang; Katrina Christopher; Stephen C L Lau; Lynda K Beaupin; Brad Love; Kim L Lipsey; Michael Feuerstein Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-03-29 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Kristin Pulewka; Daniel Wolff; Philipp Y Herzberg; Hildegard Greinix; Pia Heussner; Friederike H A Mumm; Stephanie von Harsdorf; Kathrin Rieger; Philipp Hemmati; Andreas Hochhaus; Inken Hilgendorf Journal: J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Date: 2017-04-19 Impact factor: 4.553
Authors: Marie Barnett; Glynnis McDonnell; Antonio DeRosa; Tammy Schuler; Errol Philip; Lisa Peterson; Kaitlin Touza; Sabrina Jhanwar; Thomas M Atkinson; Jennifer S Ford Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2016-02-26 Impact factor: 4.442
Authors: Kathleen E Bickel; Cari Levy; Edward R MacPhee; Keri Brenner; Jennifer S Temel; Joanna J Arch; Joseph A Greer Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-05-21 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Joan E Haase; Sheri L Robb; Debra S Burns; Kristin Stegenga; Brooke Cherven; Verna Hendricks-Ferguson; Lona Roll; Sharron L Docherty; Celeste Phillips Journal: J Music Ther Date: 2020-02-25
Authors: Kristina Geue; Annekathrin Sender; Ricarda Schmidt; Diana Richter; Andreas Hinz; Thomas Schulte; Elmar Brähler; Yve Stöbel-Richter Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2013-11-07 Impact factor: 4.147