Literature DB >> 34223129

In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries: ATLAS global surveillance programme 2015-18.

James A Karlowsky1,2, Samuel K Bouchillon1, Ramy El Mahdy Kotb3, Naglaa Mohamed4, Gregory G Stone5, Daniel F Sahm1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against a recent, 2015-18, collection of clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli from Middle Eastern and African countries with a focus on isolates from ICUs and with MDR and difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) phenotypes.
METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 4608 isolates of Enterobacterales (997 isolates from ICU patients) and 1358 isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (374 isolates from ICU patients) was performed by CLSI broth microdilution methodology in a central laboratory. MICs were interpreted using both CLSI (2020) and EUCAST (2020) MIC breakpoints.
RESULTS: Most isolates of Enterobacterales (Middle East: ICU, 99.1% susceptible, non-ICU, 99.1%; Africa: ICU, 96.9% susceptible, non-ICU, 98.3%) and P. aeruginosa (Middle East: ICU, 93.4%, non-ICU, 92.1%; Africa: ICU, 89.8%; non-ICU, 94.1%) were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Applying CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints, MDR rates were similar for Enterobacterales (27.8%-36.0% of isolates) and P. aeruginosa (25.0%-36.4%) while DTR rates were lower for Enterobacterales (1.6%-1.8%) than for P. aeruginosa (5.2%-7.4%). Percentage susceptible rates for ceftazidime/avibactam for MDR Enterobacterales were 96.8%-97.5% (Middle East) and 92.5%-94.3% (Africa) while rates for P. aeruginosa were 70.1%-80.0% (Middle East) and 69.5%-78.2% (Africa). 60.5%-65.8% (Middle East) and 38.9%-52.2% (Africa) of isolates of Enterobacterales with DTR phenotypes were ceftazidime/avibactam susceptible as were 29.2%-31.1% (Middle East) and 28.2%-35.8% (Africa) of DTR P. aeruginosa.
CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa tested from Middle Eastern and African countries were highly susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam. Most MDR and many DTR isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam.
© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34223129      PMCID: PMC8251253          DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlab067

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist        ISSN: 2632-1823


Introduction

It is important to identify clinical isolates of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) with resistance determinants and MDR phenotypes that limit empirical and first-line therapeutic options, particularly in ICUs. MDR is frequently defined using criteria established by Magiorakos et al., that is, isolates non-susceptible (intermediate or resistant) to at least one agent in three or more antimicrobial categories. More recently, Kadri et al. identified a more stringent phenotypic category termed difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) that focuses on treatment-limiting non-susceptibility (intermediate or resistant) to all first-line agents (all β-lactams, including carbapenems, and fluoroquinolones). DTR has been associated with increased patient mortality/treatment failure and requires clinicians to use other potentially less effective or more toxic agents such as aminoglycosides, tigecycline and polymyxins. To date, only two surveillance studies have published region-specific data describing GNB isolates from Middle Eastern and African countries tested against ceftazidime/avibactam., Both of these studies grouped Middle Eastern and African countries together and did not provide information describing the activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against ICU isolates or isolates with MDR or DTR phenotypes. Other publications from Middle Eastern and African countries describing the activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against GNB isolates only include case reports (seven cases in total)., One of these reports, a case series from a tertiary-care centre in Saudi Arabia, reported that five of six patients infected with carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales or Pseudomonas aeruginosa achieved both clinical and microbiological cure when treated with ceftazidime/avibactam. The current study intended to evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa isolates, gathered in 2015–18, from Middle Eastern and African countries, with a focus on ICU and non-ICU patient isolates with MDR and DTR phenotypes to assess its potential benefit against these resistant isolate subsets.

Materials and methods

Bacterial isolates

Bacterial isolates tested in the current study were collected as a part of the ATLAS global surveillance programme by laboratories in 12 medical centres in four Middle Eastern countries (six in Israel, two in Jordan, three in Kuwait, one in Saudi Arabia) and 13 medical centres in three countries in Africa (four in Morocco, three in Nigeria, six in South Africa) from 2015 to 2018. Isolates were from bloodstream, intra-abdominal, respiratory tract, skin and soft tissue and urinary tract infection specimen sources and comprised 4608 isolates of Enterobacterales (997 ICU isolates, 3611 non-ICU isolates) and 1358 isolates of P. aeruginosa (374 ICU isolates, 984 non-ICU isolates) (Table S1, available as Supplementary data at JAC-AMR Online). In Middle Eastern countries, ICU isolates were contributed by medical ICUs (45%, 330/737), paediatric ICUs (37%, 273/737), unspecified ICUs (9%, 70/737) and surgical ICUs (9%, 64/737). In African countries, ICU isolates were submitted by unspecified ICUs (41% 259/634), medical ICUs (30% 190/634), paediatric ICUs (15%, 97/634) and surgical ICUs (14%, 88/634). All isolates were shipped to IHMA (Schaumburg, IL, USA) where their identities were confirmed using MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker Daltonics, Billerica, MA, USA).

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed by IHMA using CLSI broth microdilution methodology., MICs were interpreted using CLSI and EUCAST MIC breakpoints. EUCAST MIC breakpoints listed as ‘susceptible, increased exposure’ (specifically species of Enterobacterales [Morganella morganii, Proteus spp. and Providencia spp.] tested against imipenem; P. aeruginosa tested against cefepime, ceftazidime, imipenem, levofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam) were considered susceptible when reporting individual agent, MDR and DTR results. MDR and DTR phenotypes were identified using the criteria of Magiorakos et al. and Kadri et al., respectively (Table S2).

Statistical analysis

The χ2 statistic with Yates correction (XLSTAT version 2019.1.3) was used to establish statistical significance (P < 0.05) between categorical variables.

Ethics

Ethical approval was not required.

Results

Isolates of Enterobacterales from Middle Eastern (99.1% susceptible) and African (98.0% susceptible) countries were highly susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam; 68%–72% of isolates of Enterobacterales were susceptible to ceftazidime alone (Table 1). The susceptibilities of isolates of P. aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries were highest for ceftazidime/avibactam (92%–93% susceptible) and amikacin (92%–93% susceptible); 81%–84% of isolates of P. aeruginosa were susceptible to ceftazidime alone.
Table 1.

In vitro susceptibility of isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries to 11 antimicrobial agents with MICs interpreted by CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints

Geographic region/ Bacterial group/speciesb n Percentage susceptible; MICs interpreted by CLSI/EUCASTa breakpoints
AMKATMCAZCZACSTCROcFEPIPMMEMLVXTZP
Middle East
 Enterobacterales (all)d275798.0/95.471.8/67.672.1/67.699.1/99.10/82.367.9/67.9 (1494)72.8/70.986.1/95.397.9/98.164.3/64.387.6/81.8
 Citrobacter spp. (all)23999.2/99.288.3/84.987.0/85.4100/1000/99.686.9/86.9 (168)96.7/95.097.1/99.699.6/99.683.3/83.394.6/88.7
  Citrobacter freundii 117100/10079.5/76.976.9/74.4100/1000/10078.7/78.7 (89)94.0/91.594.9/10099.1/99.170.9/70.988.9/84.6
  Citrobacter koseri 10498.1/98.197.1/97.197.1/97.1100/1000/99.097.1/97.1 (68)99.0/98.199.0/99.0100/10097.1/97.1100/92.3
 Enterobacter spp. (all)25099.6/98.471.6/67.670.0/67.297.6/97.60/85.662.4/62.4 (117)82.4/77.686.4/96.096.4/96.477.2/77.278.0/72.8
  Enterobacter cloacae 22099.5/98.269.1/65.567.3/64.597.3/97.30/90.958.5/58.5 (106)80.5/75.091.4/95.595.9/95.975.5/75.576.4/70.5
 E. coli 77098.4/94.465.1/60.468.7/61.399.9/99.90/99.263.0/63.0 (416)64.8/62.599.0/99.699.9/99.953.5/53.591.8/86.6
 Klebsiella aerogenes 13098.5/97.777.7/72.373.1/71.599.2/99.20/10072.9/72.9 (59)95.4/93.863.8/98.598.5/98.595.4/95.480.8/74.6
 Klebsiella oxytoca 130100/10093.8/90.097.7/96.9100/1000/99.289.5/89.5 (76)96.2/95.4100/100100/10093.1/93.194.6/93.8
 Klebsiella pneumoniae 79496.0/93.255.3/53.055.0/52.898.5/98.50/98.155.8/55.8 (423)55.8/54.494.3/95.794.8/95.359.9/59.978.1/68.6
 M. morganii 76100/96.193.4/85.581.6/72.4100/1000/091.7/91.7 (36)97.4/97.45.3/46.1100/10028.9/28.998.7/97.4
 Proteus spp. (all)199100/96.596.5/94.098.0/95.0100/1000/076.6/76.6 (111)81.9/81.432.7/84.4100/10057.3/57.3100/97.5
  Proteus mirabilis 127100/95.395.3/92.196.9/93.7100/1000/074.3/74.3 (70)73.2/72.432.3/84.3100/10039.4/39.4100/96.1
  Proteus vulgaris b 56100/98.2100/98.2100/96.4100/1000/085.2/85.2 (27)98.2/98.232.1/80.4100/10089.3/89.3100/100
 Providencia spp.e7190.1/85.993.0/69.087.3/57.793.0/93.00/064.0/64.0 (50)60.6/60.659.2/93.095.8/95.826.8/26.895.8/94.4
 S. marcescens 87100/98.998.9/97.798.9/98.9100/1000/4.696.9/96.9 (32)100/98.990.8/97.7100/10094.3/94.398.9/96.6
 P. aeruginosa 82792.7/92.767.8/79.780.5/80.592.4/92.40/99.5NA/NA (440)81.0/81.066.0/73.072.9/72.962.8/62.874.8/74.8
Africa
 Enterobacterales (all)f185197.8/96.371.6/69.571.7/69.098.0/98.00/84.172.7/72.7 (856)71.9/71.085.0/93.195.8/97.067.5/67.584.3/79.4
 Citrobacter spp. (all)9598.9/98.984.2/84.284.2/82.197.9/97.90/10087.0/87.0 (54)90.5/89.592.6/95.895.8/97.987.4/87.489.5/83.2
  C. freundii 4297.6/97.673.8/73.873.8/71.495.2/95.20/10079.2/79.2 (24)88.1/85.785.7/90.590.5/95.283.3/83.378.6/73.8
  C. koseri 42100/10092.9/92.992.9/90.5100/1000/10091.7/91.7 (24)92.9/92.9100/100100/10090.5/90.597.6/90.5
 Enterobacter spp. (all)22397.8/96.469.5/67.770.0/65.996.9/96.90/91.979.4/79.4 (63)72.2/70.483.0/91.992.8/95.181.2/81.278.5/76.7
  E. cloacae 18797.3/95.764.7/63.665.2/61.596.3/96.30/95.776.8/76.8 (56)67.9/65.884.5/90.491.4/94.178.1/78.174.9/72.7
 E. coli 57599.7/97.479.1/77.081/77.7100/1000/99.782.8/82.8 (267)79.0/78.399.1/99.799.7/10057.2/57.293.0/90.3
 K. aerogenes 50100/10094.0/92.088.0/86.0100/1000/98.089.3/89.3 (28)100/10082.0/100100/100100/10092.0/90.0
 K. oxytoca 5694.6/87.589.3/87.592.9/92.9100/1000/10082.9/82.9 (35)91.1/89.3100/100100/10092.9/92.989.3/89.3
 K. pneumoniae 54796.3/95.446.3/44.146.6/44.296.0/96.00/99.545.8/45.8 (273)45.0/44.488.8/92.991.2/93.258.5/58.569.1/58.0
 Klebsiella variicola 30100/10086.7/86.790.0/86.7100/1000/10085.0/85.0 (20)86.7/86.7100/100100/10090.0/90.096.7/96.7
 M. morganii 49100/98.093.9/91.885.7/81.698.0/98.00/094.7/94.7 (19)98.0/98.02.0/34.798.0/98.057.1/57.193.9/89.8
 Proteus spp. (all)12696.8/96.096.0/94.496.0/95.2100/1000/090.5/90.5 (63)95.2/94.438.1/82.5100/10083.3/83.399.2/99.2
  P. mirabilis 8797.7/96.695.4/93.195.4/94.3100/1000/095.2/95.2 (42)94.3/93.134.5/82.8100/10075.9/75.998.9/98.9
  P. vulgaris 3193.5/93.596.8/96.896.8/96.8100/1000/082.4/82.4 (17)96.8/96.851.6/80.6100/100100/100100/100
 Providencia spp.g3794.6/94.697.3/83.875.7/75.789.2/89.20/093.3/93.3 (15)89.2/86.535.1/81.189.2/91.959.5/59.589.2/86.5
 S. marcescens 6096.7/95.090.0/90.090.0/86.798.3/98.30/3.3100/100 (18)91.7/90.086.7/95.095.0/96.785.0/85.093.3/93.3
 P. aeruginosa 53191.5/91.569.3/85.983.6/83.692.7/92.70/99.8NA/NA (273)79.7/79.770.4/75.775.5/75.566.5/66.575.7/75.7

AMK, amikacin; ATM, aztreonam; CAZ, ceftazidime; CZA, ceftazidime/avibactam; CST, colistin; CRO, ceftriaxone; FEP, cefepime; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; LVX, levofloxacin; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; NA, not available.

Isolates of Enterobacterales (specifically, M. morganii, Proteus spp. and Providencia spp. tested against imipenem) and P. aeruginosa (tested against aztreonam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, levofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam) interpreted as susceptible by EUCAST MIC breakpoints included isolates testing in the susceptible, increased exposure category.

Species with fewer than 30 isolates are not shown individually.

CRO, ceftriaxone is shown with the number of isolates of Enterobacterales tested in brackets (n) as ceftriaxone was not tested against all isolates of Enterobacterales.

The 18 isolates of Citrobacter that were undefined in the table were: 3 Citrobacter amalonauticus, 6 Citrobacter braakii, 1 Citrobacter farmer, 1 Citrobacter gillenii, 1 Citrobacter murliniae and 6 Citrobacter sedlakii. The 30 isolates of Enterobacter that were undefined in the table were: 15 Enterobacter asburiae, 4 Enterobacter kobei and 11 Enterobacter sp. The 16 isolates of Proteus that were undefined in the table were: 13 Proteus hauseri, 2 Proteus penneri and 1 Proteus sp. The 11 other isolates undefined in the table were: 7 K. variicola, 2 Raoultella ornithinolytica, 1 Salmonella sp. and 1 Serratia sp.

The 71 isolates of Providencia spp. were composed of 1 Providencia alcalifaciens, 14 Providencia rettgeri and 56 P. stuartii.

The 11 isolates of Citrobacter that were undefined in the table were: 4 C. amalonauticus and 7 C. braakii. The 36 isolates of Enterobacter that were undefined in the table were: 15 E. asburiae, 7 E. kobei, 41 Enterobacter ludwigii and 13 Enterobacter sp. The 8 isolates of Proteus that were undefined in the table were: 6 P. hauseri and 2 P. penneri. The 3 other isolates undefined in the table were: 1 Pantoea dispersa, 1 R. ornithinolytica and 1 Serratia liquefaciens.

The 37 isolates of Providencia spp. were composed of 16 P. rettgeri and 21 P. stuartii.

In vitro susceptibility of isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries to 11 antimicrobial agents with MICs interpreted by CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints AMK, amikacin; ATM, aztreonam; CAZ, ceftazidime; CZA, ceftazidime/avibactam; CST, colistin; CRO, ceftriaxone; FEP, cefepime; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; LVX, levofloxacin; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam; NA, not available. Isolates of Enterobacterales (specifically, M. morganii, Proteus spp. and Providencia spp. tested against imipenem) and P. aeruginosa (tested against aztreonam, ceftazidime, cefepime, imipenem, levofloxacin and piperacillin/tazobactam) interpreted as susceptible by EUCAST MIC breakpoints included isolates testing in the susceptible, increased exposure category. Species with fewer than 30 isolates are not shown individually. CRO, ceftriaxone is shown with the number of isolates of Enterobacterales tested in brackets (n) as ceftriaxone was not tested against all isolates of Enterobacterales. The 18 isolates of Citrobacter that were undefined in the table were: 3 Citrobacter amalonauticus, 6 Citrobacter braakii, 1 Citrobacter farmer, 1 Citrobacter gillenii, 1 Citrobacter murliniae and 6 Citrobacter sedlakii. The 30 isolates of Enterobacter that were undefined in the table were: 15 Enterobacter asburiae, 4 Enterobacter kobei and 11 Enterobacter sp. The 16 isolates of Proteus that were undefined in the table were: 13 Proteus hauseri, 2 Proteus penneri and 1 Proteus sp. The 11 other isolates undefined in the table were: 7 K. variicola, 2 Raoultella ornithinolytica, 1 Salmonella sp. and 1 Serratia sp. The 71 isolates of Providencia spp. were composed of 1 Providencia alcalifaciens, 14 Providencia rettgeri and 56 P. stuartii. The 11 isolates of Citrobacter that were undefined in the table were: 4 C. amalonauticus and 7 C. braakii. The 36 isolates of Enterobacter that were undefined in the table were: 15 E. asburiae, 7 E. kobei, 41 Enterobacter ludwigii and 13 Enterobacter sp. The 8 isolates of Proteus that were undefined in the table were: 6 P. hauseri and 2 P. penneri. The 3 other isolates undefined in the table were: 1 Pantoea dispersa, 1 R. ornithinolytica and 1 Serratia liquefaciens. The 37 isolates of Providencia spp. were composed of 16 P. rettgeri and 21 P. stuartii. Percentages of isolates of individual species from ICU and non-ICU patients were largely similar between sites in the Middle East and Africa (Table S1). However, ICU and non-ICU isolates of individual species of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries demonstrated significant differences in percentage susceptibility for agents other than ceftazidime/avibactam by both CLSI or EUCAST breakpoints (Tables S3 and S4). CLSI breakpoints identified more isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa as MDR and DTR than EUCAST breakpoints with the notable exception of P. aeruginosa from the Middle East for which both CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints identified 38 isolates as DTR (Table 2). Ceftazidime/avibactam inhibited most isolates (92.5%–97.5%) of MDR Enterobacterales and 69.5% to 80.0% of MDR P. aeruginosa from Middle Eastern and African countries at its susceptible MIC breakpoint (MIC ≤8 mg/L). Many isolates of DTR Enterobacterales (38.9%–65.8%) and DTR P. aeruginosa (28.2%–35.8%) were also susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam.
Table 2.

In vitro susceptibility of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa with MDR and DTR phenotypes defined by CLSI and EUCAST MIC breakpoints stratified by geographic region (Middle East, Africa)

Geographic region/ Bacterial group/ speciesPercentage susceptible (CLSI MIC breakpointsa)
Percentage susceptible (EUCAST MIC breakpointsb)
MDR
DTR
MDR
DTR
n CZAFEPMEMTZP n CZAFEPMEMTZP n CZAFEPMEMTZP n CZAFEPMEMTZP
Middle East
 Enterobacterales101597.527.294.469.03865.800078896.817.572.048.13860.5000
 P. aeruginosa 31580.050.240.435.66131.100021170.119.018.07.04829.2000
Africa
 Enterobacterales64694.320.787.958.24652.200049492.59.464.637.73638.9000
 P. aeruginosa 17978.240.836.929.13928.200012869.515.614.15.52335.8000

CZA, ceftazidime/avibactam; FEP, cefepime; MEM, meropenem; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam.

Using CLSI MIC breakpoints, 36.8% (1015/2757) of Enterobacterales and 38.1% (315/827) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in Middle Eastern countries and 34.9% (646/1851) of Enterobacterales and 33.7% (179/531) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in African countries; 1.4% (38/2757) of Enterobacterales and 7.4% (61/827) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in Middle Eastern countries and 2.5% (46/1851) of Enterobacterales and 7.3% (39/531) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in African countries.

Using EUCAST MIC breakpoints, 28.6% (788/2757) of Enterobacterales and 25.5% (211/827) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in Middle Eastern countries and 26.7% (494/1851) of Enterobacterales and 24.1% (128/531) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in African countries; 1.4% (38/2757) of Enterobacterales and 5.8% (48/827) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in Middle Eastern countries and 1.9% (36/1851) of Enterobacterales and 4.3% (23/531) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in African countries.

In vitro susceptibility of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa with MDR and DTR phenotypes defined by CLSI and EUCAST MIC breakpoints stratified by geographic region (Middle East, Africa) CZA, ceftazidime/avibactam; FEP, cefepime; MEM, meropenem; TZP, piperacillin/tazobactam. Using CLSI MIC breakpoints, 36.8% (1015/2757) of Enterobacterales and 38.1% (315/827) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in Middle Eastern countries and 34.9% (646/1851) of Enterobacterales and 33.7% (179/531) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in African countries; 1.4% (38/2757) of Enterobacterales and 7.4% (61/827) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in Middle Eastern countries and 2.5% (46/1851) of Enterobacterales and 7.3% (39/531) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in African countries. Using EUCAST MIC breakpoints, 28.6% (788/2757) of Enterobacterales and 25.5% (211/827) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in Middle Eastern countries and 26.7% (494/1851) of Enterobacterales and 24.1% (128/531) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in African countries; 1.4% (38/2757) of Enterobacterales and 5.8% (48/827) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in Middle Eastern countries and 1.9% (36/1851) of Enterobacterales and 4.3% (23/531) of P. aeruginosa were MDR in African countries. Using CLSI MIC breakpoints, MDR rates among species of GNB from both Middle Eastern and African countries combined ranged from 8.2% for Serratia marcescens to 63.2% for M. morganii and DTR rates ranged from 0.1% for Escherichia coli to 7.4% for P. aeruginosa (Figure S1). Using EUCAST MIC breakpoints, MDR rates ranged from 7.5% for S. marcescens to 44.2% for Providencia stuartii and DTR rates ranged from 0.1% for E. coli to 5.2% for P. aeruginosa. For all isolates of Enterobacterales, rates of MDR were 20 times greater than DTR using CLSI MIC breakpoints and 17 times greater than DTR using EUCAST MIC breakpoints. For P. aeruginosa, rates of MDR were 5 times greater than DTR using both CLSI and EUCAST MIC breakpoints. For Enterobacterales, using CLSI MIC breakpoints, MDR phenotypes were 14 times more common than DTR phenotypes in ICU isolates and 23 times more common in non-ICU isolates (Figure S2). For Enterobacterales, using EUCAST MIC breakpoints, MDR phenotypes were 13 times more common than DTR phenotypes in ICU isolates and 19 times more common in non-ICU isolates. For Enterobacterales both MDR phenotypes and DTR phenotypes were significantly more common (P < 0.05) for ICU than non-ICU isolates using both CLSI and EUCAST MIC breakpoints. For P. aeruginosa, MDR phenotypes were 5 times more common than DTR phenotypes in both ICU and non-ICU isolates using both CLSI and EUCAST MIC breakpoints. For P. aeruginosa, the differences in percentage of MDR or DTR phenotypes among ICU and non-ICU isolates were not significant (P > 0.05) using either CLSI or EUCAST MIC breakpoints. For Enterobacterales, using CLSI MIC breakpoints, MDR phenotypes were 12 times (blood) to 33 times (urinary tract) more common than DTR phenotypes (Figure S3). For Enterobacterales, using EUCAST MIC breakpoints, MDR phenotypes were 11 times (blood) to 25 times (urinary tract) more common than DTR phenotypes. For Enterobacterales, the percentage of isolates with MDR phenotypes and DTR phenotypes were both significantly different (P < 0.05) among specimen sources using both CLSI and EUCAST MIC breakpoints. Blood isolates had the highest percentage of isolates with both MDR and DTR phenotypes (P < 0.05). For P. aeruginosa, MDR phenotypes were 4 to 8 times more common than DTR phenotypes across the five specimen sources using both CLSI and EUCAST MIC breakpoints. Differences in the percentage of MDR or DTR phenotypes of P. aeruginosa isolates across the five specimen sources were not significantly different (P > 0.05) using either CLSI or EUCAST MIC breakpoints. For P. aeruginosa, blood isolates had the lowest percentage of isolates that were MDR and DTR.

Discussion

The current study determined that most isolates of Enterobacterales from study centres in Middle Eastern (ICU, 99.1% susceptible; non-ICU, 99.1%) and African (ICU, 96.9% susceptible; non-ICU, 98.3%) countries and P. aeruginosa from Middle Eastern (ICU, 93.4%; non-ICU, 92.1%) and African (ICU, 89.8%; non-ICU, 94.1%) countries were susceptible to ceftazidime/avibactam (MIC ≤8 mg/L) (Table 1). Of the agents tested, only ceftazidime/avibactam and amikacin demonstrated susceptibility rates approaching 100% (95.1%–99.1%) for Enterobacterales from both ICU and non-ICU isolates from both Middle Eastern and African countries when MICs were interpreted by either CLSI or EUCAST MIC breakpoints. Ceftazidime/avibactam and amikacin were also the most active agents tested against P. aeruginosa for both ICU and non-ICU isolates from both Middle Eastern and African countries when MICs were interpreted by either CLSI or EUCAST MIC breakpoints (89.8%–96.5% susceptible). Using CLSI or EUCAST MIC breakpoints, MDR rates were up to 250 times higher than the corresponding DTR rates for the same collections of isolates (e.g. E. coli, Figure S1). This observation suggests that many MDR phenotypes identified for Enterobacterales include antimicrobial agents not considered first-line agents (i.e. β-lactams and fluoroquinolones) and may be of less importance in terms of impact on patient care, treatment options or public health. Published studies describing DTR isolates are currently limited and describe primarily bacteraemia isolates., Rates of DTR have ranged from <1% to 1.4% for Enterobacterales and from 2.3% to 9.0% P. aeruginosa in studies published by investigators in the United States, Italy and Korea,, and are comparable with the rates observed in the current study. Avibactam, a non-β-lactam diazabicyclooctane inhibitor of Ambler class A β-lactamases, including ESBLs and KPCs, class C (AmpC) β-lactamases and some class D (OXA-48) β-lactamases, restores activity to ceftazidime in most isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa that carry these β-lactamases., Ceftazidime/avibactam also inhibits clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa that are carbapenem resistant because of a combination of porin loss or upregulated antimicrobial agent efflux and elevated production of Pseudomonas-derived cephalosporinase (PDC; intrinsic AmpC). Region-specific prevalence of carbapenem resistance mechanisms should be considered when evaluating empirical treatment options. Previous studies reported that among carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales, KPC was uncommon in Middle Eastern countries, except Israel, and that carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales commonly carry NDM and OXA-48-like carbapenemases.,, Carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Saudi Arabia have been mainly associated with acquisition of NDM and OXA-48-like carbapenemases and rarely with KPCs. In conclusion, Enterobacterales with DTR phenotypes were uncommon (1.6%–1.8% of isolates) in Middle Eastern and African countries in 2015–18 while MDR isolates were frequently identified (27.8%–36.0% of isolates). MDR P. aeruginosa (25.0%–36.4%) were also commonly observed. A DTR phenotype was three to four times more common among P. aeruginosa (5.2%–7.4%) than Enterobacterales. Ceftazidime/avibactam retained in vitro activity against the majority of MDR and many DTR isolates of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa. Ceftazidime/avibactam is an important treatment option for infections caused by resistant GNB that do not carry metallo-β-lactamases, particularly Enterobacterales. Increases in infections caused by DTR isolates of GNB will pose major treatment challenges. Click here for additional data file.
  13 in total

1.  Experience with ceftazidime-avibactam treatment in a tertiary care center in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdullah Algwizani; Mohammad Alzunitan; Ahmad Alharbi; Abdulrahman Alsaedy; Sameera Aljohani; Bassam Alalwan; Jawaher Gramish; Adel Alothman
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2018-04-26       Impact factor: 3.718

2.  Multidrug-resistant, extensively drug-resistant and pandrug-resistant bacteria: an international expert proposal for interim standard definitions for acquired resistance.

Authors:  A-P Magiorakos; A Srinivasan; R B Carey; Y Carmeli; M E Falagas; C G Giske; S Harbarth; J F Hindler; G Kahlmeter; B Olsson-Liljequist; D L Paterson; L B Rice; J Stelling; M J Struelens; A Vatopoulos; J T Weber; D L Monnet
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 8.067

3.  In Vitro Susceptibility to Ceftazidime-Avibactam of Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Enterobacteriaceae Isolates Collected during the INFORM Global Surveillance Study (2012 to 2014).

Authors:  Boudewijn L M de Jonge; James A Karlowsky; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Douglas J Biedenbach; Daniel F Sahm; Wright W Nichols
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Impact of Difficult-to-Treat Resistance in Gram-negative Bacteremia on Mortality: Retrospective Analysis of Nationwide Surveillance Data.

Authors:  Kyungmin Huh; Doo Ryeon Chung; Young Eun Ha; Jae-Hoon Ko; Si-Ho Kim; Min-Ji Kim; Hee Jae Huh; Nam Yong Lee; Sun Young Cho; Cheol-In Kang; Kyong Ran Peck; Jae-Hoon Song
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-12-03       Impact factor: 9.079

5.  Genomic analysis of the first KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from a patient in Riyadh: A new public health concern in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Majed F Alghoribi; Khalifa Binkhamis; Abdulrahman A Alswaji; Ali Alhijji; Aynaa Alsharidi; Hanan H Balkhy; Michel Doumith; Ali Somily
Journal:  J Infect Public Health       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 3.718

6.  In Vitro Activity of Imipenem/Relebactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Against Clinical Isolates of Gram-negative Bacilli With Difficult-to-Treat Resistance and Multidrug-resistant Phenotypes-Study for Monitoring Antimicrobial Resistance Trends, United States 2015-2017.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Sibylle H Lob; Janet Raddatz; Daryl D DePestel; Katherine Young; Mary R Motyl; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 9.079

Review 7.  Epidemiology of common resistant bacterial pathogens in the countries of the Arab League.

Authors:  Rima A Moghnieh; Zeina A Kanafani; Hussam Z Tabaja; Sima L Sharara; Lyn S Awad; Souha S Kanj
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  In Vitro Susceptibility of Global Surveillance Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftazidime-Avibactam (INFORM 2012 to 2014).

Authors:  Wright W Nichols; Boudewijn L M de Jonge; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; James A Karlowsky; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Prognostic Utility of the New Definition of Difficult-to-Treat Resistance Among Patients With Gram-Negative Bloodstream Infections.

Authors:  Maddalena Giannella; Linda Bussini; Renato Pascale; Michele Bartoletti; Matteo Malagrinò; Livia Pancaldi; Alice Toschi; Giuseppe Ferraro; Lorenzo Marconi; Simone Ambretti; Russell Lewis; Pierluigi Viale
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.835

10.  In vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam against isolates of carbapenem-non-susceptible Enterobacteriaceae collected during the INFORM global surveillance programme (2015-17).

Authors:  Iris Spiliopoulou; Krystyna Kazmierczak; Gregory G Stone
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  1 in total

1.  Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa causing infection in Africa and the Middle East: a surveillance study from the ATLAS programme (2018-20).

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Samuel K Bouchillon; Ramy El Mahdy Kotb; Naglaa Mohamed; Gregory G Stone; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  JAC Antimicrob Resist       Date:  2022-06-17
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.