Literature DB >> 27216074

In Vitro Susceptibility of Global Surveillance Isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa to Ceftazidime-Avibactam (INFORM 2012 to 2014).

Wright W Nichols1, Boudewijn L M de Jonge1, Krystyna M Kazmierczak2, James A Karlowsky3, Daniel F Sahm3.   

Abstract

Broth microdilution antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed for ceftazidime-avibactam and comparator agents against 7,062 clinical isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from 2012 to 2014 in four geographic regions (Europe, Asia/South Pacific, Latin America, Middle East/Africa) as part of the International Network for Optimal Resistance Monitoring (INFORM) global surveillance program. The majority of isolates were susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, with the proportions susceptible differing marginally across the four regions (MIC90, 8 to 16 μg/ml; 88.7 to 93.2% susceptible), in contrast to lower susceptibilities to the following comparator β-lactam agents: ceftazidime (MIC90, 32 to 64 μg/ml; 71.5 to 80.8% susceptible), meropenem (MIC90, >8 μg/ml; 64.9 to 77.4% susceptible), and piperacillin-tazobactam (MIC90, >128 μg/ml; 62.3 to 71.3% susceptible). Compared to the overall population, susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam of isolates that were nonsusceptible to ceftazidime (n = 1,627) was reduced to between 56.8% (Middle East/Africa; MIC90, 64 μg/ml) and 68.9% (Asia/South Pacific; MIC90, 128 μg/ml), but these percentages were higher than susceptibilities to other β-lactam agents (0 to 44% susceptible, depending on region and agent; meropenem MIC90, >8 μg/ml; 26.5 to 43.9% susceptible). For this subset of isolates, susceptibilities to amikacin (MIC90, >32 μg/ml; 53.2 to 80.0% susceptible) and colistin (MIC90, 1 μg/ml; 98.5 to 99.5% susceptible) were comparable to or higher than that of ceftazidime-avibactam. A similar observation was made with isolates that were nonsusceptible to meropenem (n = 1,926), with susceptibility to ceftazidime-avibactam between 67.8% (Middle East/Africa; MIC90, 64 μg/ml) and 74.2% (Europe; MIC90, 32 μg/ml) but again with reduced susceptibility to comparators except for amikacin (MIC90, >32 μg/ml; 56.8 to 78.7% susceptible) and colistin (MIC90, 1 μg/ml; 98.9 to 99.3% susceptible). Of the 8% of isolates not susceptible to ceftazidime-avibactam, the nonsusceptibility of half could be explained by their possession of genes encoding metallo-β-lactamases. The data reported here are consistent with results from other country-specific and regional surveillance studies and show that ceftazidime-avibactam demonstrates in vitro activity against globally collected clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa, including isolates that are resistant to ceftazidime and meropenem.
Copyright © 2016, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27216074      PMCID: PMC4958170          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00220-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  33 in total

1.  Mechanistic studies of the inactivation of TEM-1 and P99 by NXL104, a novel non-beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitor.

Authors:  Thérèse Stachyra; Marie-Claude Péchereau; Jean-Michel Bruneau; Monique Claudon; Jean-Marie Frère; Christine Miossec; Kenneth Coleman; Michael T Black
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vitro activity of ceftazidime combined with NXL104 versus Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates obtained from patients in Canadian hospitals (CANWARD 2009 study).

Authors:  A Walkty; M DeCorby; P R S Lagacé-Wiens; J A Karlowsky; D J Hoban; G G Zhanel
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Avibactam and class C β-lactamases: mechanism of inhibition, conservation of the binding pocket, and implications for resistance.

Authors:  S D Lahiri; M R Johnstone; P L Ross; R E McLaughlin; N B Olivier; R A Alm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Trends in susceptibility of Escherichia coli from intra-abdominal infections to ertapenem and comparators in the United States according to data from the SMART program, 2009 to 2013.

Authors:  Sibylle H Lob; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Robert E Badal; Meredith A Hackel; Samuel K Bouchillon; Douglas J Biedenbach; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  In vitro activity of ceftazidime+NXL104 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and other non-fermenters.

Authors:  Shazad Mushtaq; Marina Warner; David M Livermore
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2010-08-26       Impact factor: 5.790

6.  Beta-lactamase lability and inducer power of newer beta-lactam antibiotics in relation to their activity against beta-lactamase-inducibility mutants of Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  D M Livermore; Y J Yang
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam combination in in vitro checkerboard assays.

Authors:  Johanna Berkhout; Maria J Melchers; Anita C van Mil; Wright W Nichols; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2014-12-08       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Comparative in vitro and in vivo efficacies of human simulated doses of ceftazidime and ceftazidime-avibactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jared L Crandon; Virna J Schuck; Mary Anne Banevicius; Marie-Eve Beaudoin; Wright W Nichols; M Angela Tanudra; David P Nicolau
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Pharmacodynamics of Ceftazidime and Avibactam in Neutropenic Mice with Thigh or Lung Infection.

Authors:  Johanna Berkhout; Maria J Melchers; Anita C van Mil; Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi; Claudia M Lagarde; Virna J Schuck; Wright W Nichols; Johan W Mouton
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Pseudomonas aeruginosa - a phenomenon of bacterial resistance.

Authors:  Tanya Strateva; Daniel Yordanov
Journal:  J Med Microbiol       Date:  2009-06-15       Impact factor: 2.472

View more
  43 in total

1.  In Vitro Activity of Aztreonam-Avibactam against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated by Clinical Laboratories in 40 Countries from 2012 to 2015.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Boudewijn L M de Jonge; Meredith A Hackel; Daniel F Sahm; Patricia A Bradford
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Isolates from Respiratory and Blood Specimens from Patients with Nosocomial Pneumonia, Including Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia, in a Phase 3 Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Gregory G Stone; Patricia A Bradford; Margaret Tawadrous; Dianna Taylor; Mary Jane Cadatal; Zhangjing Chen; Joseph W Chow
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Latin American Countries: Results from the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2015.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Samuel K Bouchillon; Boudewijn L M de Jonge; Gregory G Stone; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 4.  Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Combination: A Model-Informed Strategy for its Clinical Development.

Authors:  Sherwin K B Sy; Luning Zhuang; Serubbabel Sy; Hartmut Derendorf
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 6.447

5.  Carbapenem-Nonsusceptible Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolates from Intensive Care Units in the United States: a Potential Role for New β-Lactam Combination Agents.

Authors:  Tomefa E Asempa; David P Nicolau; Joseph L Kuti
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-26       Impact factor: 5.948

6.  Ceftazidime-Avibactam Susceptibility Breakpoints against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Wright W Nichols; Gregory G Stone; Paul Newell; Helen Broadhurst; Angela Wardman; Merran MacPherson; Katrina Yates; Todd Riccobene; Ian A Critchley; Shampa Das
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-10-24       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  Resistance to Novel β-Lactam-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations: The "Price of Progress".

Authors:  Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Andrew R Mack; Magdalena A Taracila; Robert A Bonomo
Journal:  Infect Dis Clin North Am       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 5.982

8.  In Vivo Emergence of Resistance to Novel Cephalosporin-β-Lactamase Inhibitor Combinations through the Duplication of Amino Acid D149 from OXA-2 β-Lactamase (OXA-539) in Sequence Type 235 Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Pablo A Fraile-Ribot; Xavier Mulet; Gabriel Cabot; Ester Del Barrio-Tofiño; Carlos Juan; José L Pérez; Antonio Oliver
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-08-24       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Mechanisms of Resistance to Ceftolozane/Tazobactam in Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Results of the GERPA Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Damien Fournier; Romain Carrière; Maxime Bour; Emilie Grisot; Pauline Triponney; Cédric Muller; Jérôme Lemoine; Katy Jeannot; Patrick Plésiat
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  In Vitro Activity of Ceftazidime-Avibactam against Clinical Isolates of Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Collected in Asia-Pacific Countries: Results from the INFORM Global Surveillance Program, 2012 to 2015.

Authors:  James A Karlowsky; Krystyna M Kazmierczak; Samuel K Bouchillon; Boudewijn L M de Jonge; Gregory G Stone; Daniel F Sahm
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 5.191

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.