| Literature DB >> 34221325 |
Sai Che1,2, Chenxuan Li1, Chenxu Wang3, Wasif Zaheer1, Xiaozhou Ji1, Bailey Phillips1, Guvanch Gurbandurdyyev1, Jessica Glynn1, Zi-Hao Guo4, Mohammed Al-Hashimi5, Hong-Cai Zhou1,3, Sarbajit Banerjee1,3, Lei Fang1,3.
Abstract
It is urgently desired yet challenging to synthesize porous graphitic carbon (PGC) in a bottom-up manner while circumventing the need for high-temperature pyrolysis. Here we present an effective and scalable strategy to synthesize PGC through acid-mediated aldol triple condensation followed by low-temperature graphitization. The deliberate structural design enables its graphitization in situ in solution and at low pyrolysis temperature. The resulting material features ultramicroporosity characterized by a sharp pore size distribution. In addition, the pristine homogeneous composition of the reaction mixture allows for solution-processability of the material for further characterization and applications. Thin films of this PGC exhibit several orders of magnitude higher electrical conductivity compared to analogous control materials that are carbonized at the same temperatures. The integration of low-temperature graphitization and solution-processability not only allows for an energy-efficient method for the production and fabrication of PGC, but also paves the way for its wider employment in applications such as electrocatalysis, sensing, and energy storage. This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34221325 PMCID: PMC8221055 DOI: 10.1039/d1sc01902c
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Chem Sci ISSN: 2041-6520 Impact factor: 9.825
Fig. 1(a) Previously reported synthesis of non-graphitic p-PPN. (b) Solution-phase synthesis of the pro-graphitic precursor PGC-Pr from DAB monomer, and the subsequent pyrolysis to afford PGC materials PGC-T (T represents the pyrolysis temperature ranging from 300–1000 °C).
Fig. 2(a) Comparison of Raman spectra of PGC-Pr and p-PPN. (b) Raman spectra of PGC after pyrolysis at varied temperatures. (c) PXRD data of PGC-Pr, PGC-600, and PGC-1000. (d) XANES data at the C K-edge of PGC-Pr and PGC-600.
Fig. 3(a) TGA curves of PGC-Pr and p-PPN. (b) Relationship between BET surface areas of PGC and pyrolysis temperatures. (c) N2 adsorption isotherms (77 K) of PGC-Pr and PGC-800. (d) Pore size distribution of PGC-800.
Fig. 4Four-point probe I–V plot of (a) PGC-500 and p-PPN-500 films (thickness ∼ 100 μm) and (b) PGC-600 and p-PPN-600 films (thickness ∼ 90 μm). (c) Comparison of conductivity of PGC films and p-PPN films with different temperature pyrolysis.