| Literature DB >> 34221023 |
Yiyang Wang1,2,3, Baoshuai Bai3,4,5, Yanzhu Hu1,2, Haoming Wang2,6, Ningyuan Liu1,2, Yibo Li7, Pei Li1,2, Guangdong Zhou3,4,5, Qiang Zhou1,2.
Abstract
Established studies proved that hydrostatic pressure had multiple effects on the biological behavior of the intervertebral disc (IVD). However, the conclusions of the previous studies were inconsistent, due to the difference in hydrostatic loading devices and observing methods used in these studies. The current study is aimed at investigating the role of dynamic hydrostatic pressure in regulating biological behavior of the notochordal nucleus pulposus (NP) and fibrocartilaginous inner annulus fibrosus (AF) and its possible mechanism using our novel self-developed hydrostatic pressure bioreactor. The differences in the biological behavior of the rabbit IVD tissues under different degree of hydrostatic pressure were evaluated via histological analysis. Results revealed that low-loading dynamic hydrostatic pressure was beneficial for cell survival and extracellular matrix (ECM) homeostasis in notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF via upregulating N-cadherin (N-CDH) and integrin β1. In comparison, high-magnitude dynamic hydrostatic pressure aggravated the breakdown of ECM homeostasis in NP and inner AF via enhancing the Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway-mediated cell apoptosis. Moreover, inner AF exhibited greater tolerance to physiological medium-loading degree of hydrostatic pressure than notochordal NP. The potential mechanism was related to the differential expression of mechanosensing factors in notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF, which affects the fate of the cells under hydrostatic pressure. Our findings may provide a better understanding of the regulatory role of hydrostatic pressure on the cellular fate commitment and matrix metabolism of the IVD and more substantial evidence for using hydrostatic pressure bioreactor in exploring the IVD degeneration mechanism as well as regeneration strategies.Entities:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34221023 PMCID: PMC8221882 DOI: 10.1155/2021/5626487
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Stem Cells Int Impact factor: 5.443
Figure 1Effect of hydrostatic pressure on histomorphology and glycosaminoglycan synthesis of the rabbit notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF: (a) appearance of the self-developed hydrostatic pressure bioreactor and touch-screen control system; (b) appearance of the tissue culture chamber of hydrostatic pressure bioreactor; (c) gross view of the endplate-removed rabbit IVD: the area in the blue circle indicates the notochordal NP, and the area between the red and blue circles indicates the fibrocartilaginous inner AF; (d) HE staining of the notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (e) alcian blue staining of the notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (f) quantification of the notochordal NP sGAG under graded hydrostatic pressure; (g) quantification of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF sGAG under graded hydrostatic pressure. ∗P < 0.05. P > 0.05. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 2Effect of hydrostatic pressure on cellular survival of the rabbit notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF: (a) fluorescent TUNEL staining of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (b) statistic analysis of TUNEL positive rate of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure; (c) fluorescent TUNEL staining of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (d) statistic analysis of TUNEL positive rate of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure. ∗P < 0.05. P > 0.05. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 3Effect of hydrostatic pressure on synthesis of aggrecan of the rabbit notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF: (a) aggrecan IHC staining of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (b) statistic analysis of IHC aggrecan AOD value of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure; (c) aggrecan IHC staining of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (d) statistic analysis of IHC aggrecan AOD value of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure. ∗P < 0.05. P > 0.05. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 4Effect of hydrostatic pressure on synthesis of collagen type I of the rabbit notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF: (a) collagen type I IHC staining of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (b) statistic analysis of IHC collagen type I AOD value of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure; (c) collagen type I IHC staining of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (d) statistic analysis of IHC collagen type I AOD value of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure. ∗P < 0.05. P > 0.05. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 5Effect of hydrostatic pressure on synthesis of collagen type II of the rabbit notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF: (a) collagen type II IHC staining of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (b) statistic analysis of IHC collagen type II AOD value of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure; (c) collagen type II IHC staining of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure (200x); (d) statistic analysis of IHC collagen type II AOD value of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure. ∗P < 0.05. P > 0.05. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 6Differential expression of N-CDH and integrin β1 in the rabbit notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF: (a) N-CDH (red) and integrin β1 (green) fluorescent staining of rabbit notochordal NP (200x); (b) statistic analysis of fluorescent N-CDH AOD value of the notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF; (c) N-CDH (red) and integrin β1 (green) fluorescent staining of rabbit fibrocartilaginous inner AF (200x); (d) statistic analysis of fluorescent integrin β1 AOD value of the notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF. ∗P < 0.05. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 7Effect of hydrostatic pressure on YAP/TAZ pathway-mediated apoptosis of the rabbit notochordal NP and fibrocartilaginous inner AF: (a) YAP/TAZ complex (green) fluorescent staining of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under low-loading (0.5 MPa) or high-magnitude (1.0 MPa) physiological hydrostatic pressure (200x); (b) statistic analysis of YAP/TAZ complex nucleus/cytoplasm distribution; (c) western blotting analysis of the expression levels of N-CDH, integrin β1, and YAP/TAZ-mediated apoptosis markers (YAP/nucleus, YAP/cytoplasm, Caspase3) of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure; (d) western blotting analysis of the expression levels of N-CDH, integrin β1, and YAP/TAZ-mediated apoptosis markers (YAP/nucleus, YAP/cytoplasm, Caspase3) of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure; (e) statistic analysis of the western blots of the notochordal NP under graded hydrostatic pressure; (f) statistic analysis of the western blots of the fibrocartilaginous inner AF under graded hydrostatic pressure. ∗P < 0.05. P > 0.05. Scale bar = 100 μm.
Figure 8Schematic diagram shows the potential mechanism of physiological hydrostatic pressure effects the IVD cell survival and ECM homeostasis: low-loading physiological hydrostatic pressure activates mechanosensitive factors N-CDH and integrin β1, which inhibit Hippo-YAP/TAZ pathway-mediated cell apoptosis and ECM catabolism.