| Literature DB >> 34220834 |
Adrianos Nezos1, Charalampos Skarlis1, Anna Psarrou1, Konstantinos Markakis1, Panagiotis Garantziotis1,2, Asimina Papanikolaou3, Fotini Gravani4, Michael Voulgarelis5, Athanasios G Tzioufas5,6, Michael Koutsilieris1, Haralampos M Moutsopoulos5,7, Eleni Kotsifaki1, Clio P Mavragani1,5,6.
Abstract
Background: B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (B-NHL) is one of the major complications of primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS). Chronic inflammation and macrophages in SS minor salivary glands have been previously suggested as significant predictors for lymphoma development among SS patients. Lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2)-a product mainly of tissue macrophages-is found in the circulation associated with lipoproteins and has been previously involved in cardiovascular, autoimmune, and malignant diseases, including lymphoma. Objective: The purpose of the current study was to investigate the contributory role of Lp-PLA2 in B-NHL development in the setting of primary SS.Entities:
Keywords: Sjögren’s syndrome; lipoprotein-associated phospholipase A2 (Lp-PLA2); lymphomagenesis; novel therapeutic target; serum biomarker
Year: 2021 PMID: 34220834 PMCID: PMC8253309 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.683623
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Figure 1Serum Lp-PLA2 activity in the two SS sets of samples and receiver-operating characteristic analysis (ROC) curve analysis for both radioimmunoassay and ELISA protocols. (A) Increased Lp-PLA2 activity measured by liquid scintillation in SS-L patients compared to SS-nL (p-value: 0.003) and HC (p=0.04). (B) ROC analysis revealed that serum Lp-PLA2 activity measured by radioimmunoassay has the potential to distinguish between SS-L and SS-nL patients [area under the curve (AUC) = 0.8022, CI (95%): 0.64–0.96, p-value: 0.004]. (C) When ROC curves for the predictive models were fitted, AUC were 0.7196, CI (95%): 0.56–0.88, p-value: 0.04 for SS-L vs HC. (D) Increased Lp-PLA2 activity measured by ELISA in patients with SS-L compared to SS-nL patients (p-value: <0.0001) and HC (p-value: <0.0001). (E) ROC analysis showed that serum Lp-PLA2 activity measured by ELISA has the potential to distinguish between SS-L and SS-nL patients with AUC 0.7696, CI (95%): 0.66–0.88, p-value <0.0001 and (F) For SS-L patients vs HC, ROC curves showed an AUC 0.8114, CI (95%): 0.70–0.92, p-value < 0.0001. HC, healthy controls; SS-nL, Sjogren’s syndrome without lymphoma; SS-L, Sjogren’s syndrome complicated by lymphoma; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 2Lp-PLA2 (encoded by the PLA2G7 gene) mRNA expression (measured by real-time PCR) and protein density (tested by Western blot) in MSG tissues of our study participants and ROC curve analysis for both methods. (A) PLA2G7 gene expression was significantly increased in SS-L patients compared to both SS-nL patients and SC (p-values: 0.0012 and 0.0013, respectively). (B) ROC analysis could distinguish between SS-L and SS-nL patients with an AUC 0.8490, CI (95%): 0.71–0.99, p-value: 0.0019. (C) For SS-nL vs SC patients ROC curves showed an AUC 0.9444, CI (95%): 0.84–1.00, p- value: 0.0027. (D) Increased Lp-PLA2 protein expression was found in MSG total protein extracts derived from SS-L patients compared to both SS-nL patients and SC as tested by Western Blot (p-values: 0.0476 and 0.0357, respectively). (E) ROC analysis for Lp-PLA2 protein expression depicted an AUC of 0.94, CI (95%): 0.79–1.00, p-value: 0.0389 for SS-L vs SS-nL patients. (F) ROC analysis revealed an AUC of 1.00, CI (95%): 1.00–1.00, p-value: 0.0253. (G) Representative image of Lp-PLA2 and GAPDH MSG protein expression by Western Blot. SC, controls with sicca complaints; SS-n, Sjogren’s syndrome; SS-L, Sjogren’s syndrome complicated by lymphoma; ROC, receiver operating characteristic; AUC, area under the curve.
Figure 3Lp-PLA-2 immunohistochemical expression in minor salivary gland (MSG) tissue sections from patients with sicca features (SC), Sjögren’s syndrome with no lymphoma (SS-nL), Sjogren’s syndrome with lymphoma (SS-L) (A–F), as well as in a lymph node derived from a patient with marginal zone lymphoma (G, H). (A) Isotype Control staining (grade 0), (B) Lp-PLA2 staining in SC (grade 1), (C) Lp-PLA2 staining in SS-nL (grade 2), (D) Lp-PLA2 staining in SS-L (grade 3), (E) Lp-PLA2 in SS-L, (F) CD68 staining (denoting the presence of tissue macrophages) in SS-L (same patient as E), (G) Hematoxylin & Eosin (H&E staining), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), (H) Lp-PLA2 in a lymph node from a non-SS patient with MZL (same patient as G).