Literature DB >> 34220147

Associations of depression and sociodemographic characteristics with patient activation among those presenting for spine surgery.

Emmanuel L McNeely1, Rahul Sachdev1, Rafa Rahman1, Bo Zhang1, Richard L Skolasky1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the associations of sociodemographic characteristics and PROMIS domain scores with patient activation among patients presenting for spine surgery at a university-affiliated spine center.
METHODS: Patients completed a survey collecting demographic and social information. Patients also completed the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and Patient Activation Measure questionnaires. The associations of PROMIS scores and sociodemographic characteristics with patient activation were assessed using linear and ordinal logistic regression (patient activation stage as ordinal).
RESULTS: A total of 1018 patients were included. Most respondents were white (84%), married (73%), and female (52%). Patients were distributed among the 4 activation stages as follows: stage I, 7.7%; stage II, 12%; stage III, 26%; and stage IV, 55%. Mean (±standard deviation) patient activation score was 70 ± 17 points. Female sex (adjusted coefficient [AC] = 4.3; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1, 6.4) and annual household income >$80,000 (OR = 3.7; 95% CI 0.54, 6.9) were associated with higher patient activation scores. Lower patient activation scores were associated with worse PROMIS Depression (AC = -0.31; 95% CI -0.48, -0.14), Fatigue (OR = -0.19; 95% CI -0.33, -0.05), Pain (OR = 0.22; 95% CI 0.01, 0.43), and Social Satisfaction (OR = 0.33; 95% CI 0.14, 0.51) scores.
CONCLUSION: Depression and socioeconomic status, along with PROMIS Pain, Fatigue, and Social Satisfaction domains, were associated with patient activation. Patients with a greater burden of depressive symptoms had lower patient activation; conversely, women and those with higher income had greater patient activation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1.
© 2021 Professor P K Surendran Memorial Education Foundation. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Depression; Patient activation; Socioeconomic status; Spine surgery

Year:  2021        PMID: 34220147      PMCID: PMC8242331          DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop        ISSN: 0972-978X


  25 in total

1.  Patient activation and functional recovery in persons undergoing spine surgery.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Ellen J Mackenzie; Stephen T Wegener; Lee H Riley
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  An inventory for measuring depression.

Authors:  A T BECK; C H WARD; M MENDELSON; J MOCK; J ERBAUGH
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1961-06

3.  Variations in 30-day readmissions and length of stay among spine surgeons: a national study of elective spine surgery among US Medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Siddhartha Singh; Rodney Sparapani; Marjorie C Wang
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2018-06-01

4.  Promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management: evaluating a patient activation intervention.

Authors:  Geoffrey C Williams; Holly McGregor; Allan Zeldman; Zachary R Freedman; Edward L Deci; Daniel Elder
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2005-01

5.  Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with chronic disabling occupational spinal disorders.

Authors:  Jeffrey Dersh; Robert J Gatchel; Tom Mayer; Peter Polatin; Owen R Temple
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2006-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Development and testing of a short form of the patient activation measure.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Eldon R Mahoney; Jean Stockard; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

7.  Patient activation and adherence to physical therapy in persons undergoing spine surgery.

Authors:  Richard L Skolasky; Ellen J Mackenzie; Stephen T Wegener; Lee H Riley
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  A house is not a home: keeping patients at the center of practice redesign.

Authors:  Robert A Berenson; Terry Hammons; David N Gans; Stephen Zuckerman; Katie Merrell; William S Underwood; Aimee F Williams
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2008 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Development of the Patient Activation Measure (PAM): conceptualizing and measuring activation in patients and consumers.

Authors:  Judith H Hibbard; Jean Stockard; Eldon R Mahoney; Martin Tusler
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  An educational and behavioral approach toward increasing patient activation in hypertension management.

Authors:  D E Morisky; M H Bowler; J S Finlay
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1982
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.