STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between baseline patient activation and participation in postoperative physical therapy in a cohort of individuals after lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Patient Activation Measure is a recently developed tool to assess patient activation. Patient activation is defined as an individual's propensity to engage in adaptive health behavior that may, in turn, lead to improved patient outcomes. It has not previously been used in spine research. METHODS: We assessed baseline patient activation levels in individuals presenting for surgery of the lumbar spine via the Patient Activation Measure. Differences in patient characteristics across patient-activation quartiles were assessed using analysis of variance. After surgery, we assessed attendance (self-reported weekly) and engagement in physical therapy (at the last visit, using the Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale) and determined the ratio of sessions attended to sessions prescribed. The influence of baseline patient activation, in the setting of other patient characteristics, to predict attendance and engagement with physical therapy was examined using linear regression methods. RESULTS: Scores on the Patient Activation Measure were positively correlated with participation (r = 0.53) and engagement (r = 0.75) in physical therapy. Individuals with low activation were more likely to report low self-efficacy for physical therapy, low hope, and external locus of control compared with those with high activation. CONCLUSION: Increased patient activation is associated with improved adherence with physical therapy as reflected in attendance and engagement.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective longitudinal study. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between baseline patient activation and participation in postoperative physical therapy in a cohort of individuals after lumbar spine surgery. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Patient Activation Measure is a recently developed tool to assess patient activation. Patient activation is defined as an individual's propensity to engage in adaptive health behavior that may, in turn, lead to improved patient outcomes. It has not previously been used in spine research. METHODS: We assessed baseline patient activation levels in individuals presenting for surgery of the lumbar spine via the Patient Activation Measure. Differences in patient characteristics across patient-activation quartiles were assessed using analysis of variance. After surgery, we assessed attendance (self-reported weekly) and engagement in physical therapy (at the last visit, using the Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale) and determined the ratio of sessions attended to sessions prescribed. The influence of baseline patient activation, in the setting of other patient characteristics, to predict attendance and engagement with physical therapy was examined using linear regression methods. RESULTS: Scores on the Patient Activation Measure were positively correlated with participation (r = 0.53) and engagement (r = 0.75) in physical therapy. Individuals with low activation were more likely to report low self-efficacy for physical therapy, low hope, and external locus of control compared with those with high activation. CONCLUSION: Increased patient activation is associated with improved adherence with physical therapy as reflected in attendance and engagement.
Authors: Kathleen B Kortte; Lara D Falk; Renan C Castillo; Doug Johnson-Greene; Stephen T Wegener Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jeanine A Verbunt; Henk A Seelen; Johan W Vlaeyen; Geert J van der Heijden; J Andre Knottnerus Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Eric J Lenze; Michael C Munin; Tanya Quear; Mary Amanda Dew; Joan C Rogers; Amy E Begley; Charles F Reynolds Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Richard L Skolasky; Ariel Frank Green; Daniel Scharfstein; Chad Boult; Lisa Reider; Stephen T Wegener Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2010-11-19 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Lisette Ackermans; Michiel G Hageman; A H Bos; Daniel Haverkamp; Vanessa A B Scholtes; Rudolf W Poolman Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2018-04 Impact factor: 4.176
Authors: Kelsey J Picha; Kate N Jochimsen; Nicholas R Heebner; John P Abt; Ellen L Usher; Gilson Capilouto; Tim L Uhl Journal: Musculoskeletal Care Date: 2018-09-20
Authors: Richard L Skolasky; Anica M Maggard; David Li; Lee H Riley; Stephen T Wegener Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Richard L Skolasky; Anica M Maggard; David Li; Lee H Riley; Stephen T Wegener Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2015-03-28 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Heather M Richard; Dylan C Nguyen; John G Birch; Sandy D Roland; Mikhail K Samchukov; Alex M Cherkashin Journal: Clin Orthop Relat Res Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 4.176