Literature DB >> 34220009

Evaluation of Sigma-Metric and Application of Quality Tools in Clinical Laboratory of a Tertiary Care Hospital.

Puja Kumari Jha1, Nirupama Sharma1, Juhee Chandra2, Rachna Agarwal1.   

Abstract

Variability in analytical performance of some analyte indicated the need of evaluation of quality plan of our laboratory. We tried to put the same degree of effort into our quality metrics as we put into the laboratory processes themselves. Application of six sigma methodologies improve the quality by focusing on the root causes of the problems in performance and analyzing by flowcharts, fishbone diagrams and other quality tools. Sigma metric was calculated for laboratory parameters for a period of 8 months during 2018-19. The analytes with poor sigma metric were free Thyroxine (FT3, FT4), Sodium, Calcium and Magnesium. Sigma metric of free Thyroxine (FT3, FT4), Sodium, Calcium and Magnesium were below 3. A road map for process improvement was designed with DMAIC (Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control) model to solve the issue. Possible causes for low analytical performance of the particular analytes were depicted in Fishbone diagram. The Fishbone analysis identified the water quality issues with electrolyte analysis while high ambient temperature was culprit for poor assay performance of free Thyroxine. Sigma metric of the analytical performance was assessed once again after root cause analysis. Sigmametric showed marked improvement in control phase. Identification of problems led to reduction in non value added work leading to adequate resource utilization by addressing the priority issue. Therefore, DMAIC tool with Fish bone model analysis can be recommended as a well suited method for troubleshooting in poor performance of laboratory parameter. © Association of Clinical Biochemists of India 2020.

Entities:  

Keywords:  DMAIC; Fish-bone model; Quality plan; Sigma metric

Year:  2020        PMID: 34220009      PMCID: PMC8215019          DOI: 10.1007/s12291-020-00920-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem        ISSN: 0970-1915


  5 in total

1.  Evaluating laboratory performance on quality indicators with the six sigma scale.

Authors:  D Nevalainen; L Berte; C Kraft; E Leigh; L Picaso; T Morgan
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.534

2.  Setting performance goals and evaluating total analytical error for diagnostic assays.

Authors:  Jan S Krouwer
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Internal quality control: planning and implementation strategies.

Authors:  James O Westgard
Journal:  Ann Clin Biochem       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 2.057

4.  The quality of laboratory testing today: an assessment of sigma metrics for analytic quality using performance data from proficiency testing surveys and the CLIA criteria for acceptable performance.

Authors:  James O Westgard; Sten A Westgard
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.493

5.  Equivalence of critical error calculations and process capability index Cpk.

Authors:  D Chesher; L Burnett
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 8.327

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.