Masaoki Ito1, Yoshihiro Miyata1, Shoko Hirano2, Fumiko Irisuna2, Kei Kushitani3, Yuichiro Kai1, Naoto Kishi1, Yasuhiro Tsutani1, Yukio Takeshima3, Morihito Okada4. 1. Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. 2. Analysis Center of Life Science, Natural Science Center for Basic Research and Development, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. 3. Department of Pathology, Graduate School of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. 4. Department of Surgical Oncology, Research Institute for Radiation Biology and Medicine, Hiroshima University, 1-2-3 Kasumi, Minami-ku, Hiroshima, 734-8551, Japan. morihito1217@gmail.com.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Liquid biopsy for early-stage lung cancer diagnosis is challenging, and optimal candidates' clinicopathological features are unknown. We investigated utility and clinicopathological features of optimal candidates in somatic mutation-targeted liquid biopsy using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in pN0M0 EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS: We performed EGFR mutation-targeted ddPCR liquid biopsy in 100 patients with resected pN0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma, whose tumor diameter in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was ≤ 5 cm. Peripheral blood-derived serum was collected preoperatively. Two representative EGFR somatic variants (exon 19 [E746-A750 del (2235_2249 del)]; exon 21 (L858R)) were utilized as liquid biopsy targets. Clinicopathological features including radiological appearance, subhistology, and invasive status were compared between ddPCR-positive and ddPCR-negative patients. RESULTS: Among the 100 patients, 98 showed part-solid or pure-solid appearance in HRCT and 2 showed non-solid appearance; 98 were pathological stage IA1-IB. Of the 66 patients with EGFR mutation detection in ddPCR, 12 were significantly positive and 10 (83.3%, 10/12) exhibited pure-solid appearance in HRCT. Clinical invasive tumor ratio was significantly higher in ddPCR-positive than in ddPCR-negative patients (median: 100% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.0212), whereas other clinicopathological features were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Mutation-targeted liquid biopsy using ddPCR detected lung cancer in 12.0% (12/100) of pN0M0 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients. In 83.3% of the ddPCR-positive patients, tumors showed pure-solid appearance in HRCT. The detection ratio increased to 21.3% (10/47) among patients with pure-solid appearance tumors. Tumor appearance might be useful for better selection of liquid biopsy candidates.
PURPOSE: Liquid biopsy for early-stage lung cancer diagnosis is challenging, and optimal candidates' clinicopathological features are unknown. We investigated utility and clinicopathological features of optimal candidates in somatic mutation-targeted liquid biopsy using droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) in pN0M0 EGFR mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma patients. METHODS: We performed EGFR mutation-targeted ddPCR liquid biopsy in 100 patients with resected pN0M0 invasive lung adenocarcinoma, whose tumor diameter in high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) was ≤ 5 cm. Peripheral blood-derived serum was collected preoperatively. Two representative EGFR somatic variants (exon 19 [E746-A750 del (2235_2249 del)]; exon 21 (L858R)) were utilized as liquid biopsy targets. Clinicopathological features including radiological appearance, subhistology, and invasive status were compared between ddPCR-positive and ddPCR-negative patients. RESULTS: Among the 100 patients, 98 showed part-solid or pure-solid appearance in HRCT and 2 showed non-solid appearance; 98 were pathological stage IA1-IB. Of the 66 patients with EGFR mutation detection in ddPCR, 12 were significantly positive and 10 (83.3%, 10/12) exhibited pure-solid appearance in HRCT. Clinical invasive tumor ratio was significantly higher in ddPCR-positive than in ddPCR-negative patients (median: 100% vs. 85.4%, P = 0.0212), whereas other clinicopathological features were not significantly different. CONCLUSION: Mutation-targeted liquid biopsy using ddPCR detected lung cancer in 12.0% (12/100) of pN0M0 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients. In 83.3% of the ddPCR-positive patients, tumors showed pure-solid appearance in HRCT. The detection ratio increased to 21.3% (10/47) among patients with pure-solid appearance tumors. Tumor appearance might be useful for better selection of liquid biopsy candidates.
Authors: Frank C Detterbeck; Sandra Zelman Lewis; Rebecca Diekemper; Doreen Addrizzo-Harris; W Michael Alberts Journal: Chest Date: 2013-05 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Chetan Bettegowda; Mark Sausen; Rebecca J Leary; Isaac Kinde; Yuxuan Wang; Nishant Agrawal; Bjarne R Bartlett; Hao Wang; Brandon Luber; Rhoda M Alani; Emmanuel S Antonarakis; Nilofer S Azad; Alberto Bardelli; Henry Brem; John L Cameron; Clarence C Lee; Leslie A Fecher; Gary L Gallia; Peter Gibbs; Dung Le; Robert L Giuntoli; Michael Goggins; Michael D Hogarty; Matthias Holdhoff; Seung-Mo Hong; Yuchen Jiao; Hartmut H Juhl; Jenny J Kim; Giulia Siravegna; Daniel A Laheru; Calogero Lauricella; Michael Lim; Evan J Lipson; Suely Kazue Nagahashi Marie; George J Netto; Kelly S Oliner; Alessandro Olivi; Louise Olsson; Gregory J Riggins; Andrea Sartore-Bianchi; Kerstin Schmidt; le-Ming Shih; Sueli Mieko Oba-Shinjo; Salvatore Siena; Dan Theodorescu; Jeanne Tie; Timothy T Harkins; Silvio Veronese; Tian-Li Wang; Jon D Weingart; Christopher L Wolfgang; Laura D Wood; Dongmei Xing; Ralph H Hruban; Jian Wu; Peter J Allen; C Max Schmidt; Michael A Choti; Victor E Velculescu; Kenneth W Kinzler; Bert Vogelstein; Nickolas Papadopoulos; Luis A Diaz Journal: Sci Transl Med Date: 2014-02-19 Impact factor: 17.956
Authors: Peter Goldstraw; Kari Chansky; John Crowley; Ramon Rami-Porta; Hisao Asamura; Wilfried E E Eberhardt; Andrew G Nicholson; Patti Groome; Alan Mitchell; Vanessa Bolejack Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2016-01 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Christopher Abbosh; Nicolai J Birkbak; Gareth A Wilson; Mariam Jamal-Hanjani; Tudor Constantin; Raheleh Salari; John Le Quesne; David A Moore; Selvaraju Veeriah; Rachel Rosenthal; Teresa Marafioti; Eser Kirkizlar; Thomas B K Watkins; Nicholas McGranahan; Sophia Ward; Luke Martinson; Joan Riley; Francesco Fraioli; Maise Al Bakir; Eva Grönroos; Francisco Zambrana; Raymondo Endozo; Wenya Linda Bi; Fiona M Fennessy; Nicole Sponer; Diana Johnson; Joanne Laycock; Seema Shafi; Justyna Czyzewska-Khan; Andrew Rowan; Tim Chambers; Nik Matthews; Samra Turajlic; Crispin Hiley; Siow Ming Lee; Martin D Forster; Tanya Ahmad; Mary Falzon; Elaine Borg; David Lawrence; Martin Hayward; Shyam Kolvekar; Nikolaos Panagiotopoulos; Sam M Janes; Ricky Thakrar; Asia Ahmed; Fiona Blackhall; Yvonne Summers; Dina Hafez; Ashwini Naik; Apratim Ganguly; Stephanie Kareht; Rajesh Shah; Leena Joseph; Anne Marie Quinn; Phil A Crosbie; Babu Naidu; Gary Middleton; Gerald Langman; Simon Trotter; Marianne Nicolson; Hardy Remmen; Keith Kerr; Mahendran Chetty; Lesley Gomersall; Dean A Fennell; Apostolos Nakas; Sridhar Rathinam; Girija Anand; Sajid Khan; Peter Russell; Veni Ezhil; Babikir Ismail; Melanie Irvin-Sellers; Vineet Prakash; Jason F Lester; Malgorzata Kornaszewska; Richard Attanoos; Haydn Adams; Helen Davies; Dahmane Oukrif; Ayse U Akarca; John A Hartley; Helen L Lowe; Sara Lock; Natasha Iles; Harriet Bell; Yenting Ngai; Greg Elgar; Zoltan Szallasi; Roland F Schwarz; Javier Herrero; Aengus Stewart; Sergio A Quezada; Karl S Peggs; Peter Van Loo; Caroline Dive; C Jimmy Lin; Matthew Rabinowitz; Hugo J W L Aerts; Allan Hackshaw; Jacqui A Shaw; Bernhard G Zimmermann; Charles Swanton Journal: Nature Date: 2017-04-26 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Elisa Chilet-Rosell; Lucy A Parker; Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado; María Pastor-Valero; José Vilar; Isabel González-Álvarez; José María Salinas-Serrano; Fermina Lorente-Fernández; M Luisa Domingo; Blanca Lumbreras Journal: PLoS One Date: 2019-09-11 Impact factor: 3.240