Literature DB >> 21900837

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutation status in circulating free DNA in serum: from IPASS, a phase III study of gefitinib or carboplatin/paclitaxel in non-small cell lung cancer.

Koichi Goto1, Yukito Ichinose, Yuichiro Ohe, Nobuyuki Yamamoto, Shunichi Negoro, Kazuto Nishio, Yohji Itoh, Haiyi Jiang, Emma Duffield, Rose McCormack, Nagahiro Saijo, Tony Mok, Masahiro Fukuoka.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In IPASS (IRESSA Pan-Asia Study), clinically selected patients with pulmonary adenocarcinoma received first-line gefitinib or carboplatin/paclitaxel. This preplanned, exploratory analysis was conducted to increase understanding of the use of surrogate samples, such as serum, versus tumor biopsy samples for determining EGFR mutation status in the Japanese cohort (n = 233).
METHODS: EGFR mutations were assessed using tumor tissue-derived DNA (n = 91) and circulating free (cf) DNA from pretreatment serum samples (n = 194).
RESULTS: Fewer patients were EGFR mutation positive when assessed using pretreatment cfDNA (23.7%) versus tumor tissue-derived DNA (61.5%). cfDNA results identified no false positives but a high rate of false negatives (56.9%). There was a significant interaction between cfDNA EGFR mutation status and treatment for progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.045). PFS was significantly longer and objective response rate (ORR) higher with gefitinib than carboplatin/paclitaxel in the cfDNA EGFR mutation-positive subgroup (PFS: hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.60; p < 0.001; ORR: odds ratio [OR], 1.71; 95% CI, 0.48-6.09; 75.0% versus 63.6%; p = 0.40). There was a slight numerical advantage in PFS and ORR for gefitinib over carboplatin/paclitaxel in the cfDNA EGFR mutation-negative subgroup, likely due to the high rate of false negatives within this subgroup.
CONCLUSIONS: These results merit further investigation to determine whether alternative sources of tumor DNA, such as cfDNA in serum, could be used for determining EGFR mutation status in future; currently, where a sample is available, analysis of tumor material is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 21900837     DOI: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e3182307f98

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Oncol        ISSN: 1556-0864            Impact factor:   15.609


  95 in total

Review 1.  Role of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of free circulating DNA in the management of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Paola Ulivi; Rosella Silvestrini
Journal:  Cell Oncol (Dordr)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 6.730

2.  Prospective Validation of Rapid Plasma Genotyping for the Detection of EGFR and KRAS Mutations in Advanced Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Adrian G Sacher; Cloud Paweletz; Suzanne E Dahlberg; Ryan S Alden; Allison O'Connell; Nora Feeney; Stacy L Mach; Pasi A Jänne; Geoffrey R Oxnard
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Urinary cell-free DNA as a prognostic marker for KRAS-positive advanced-stage NSCLC.

Authors:  F Xie; P Li; J Gong; H Tan; J Ma
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 3.405

4.  Liquid biopsy mutation panel for non-small cell lung cancer: analytical validation and clinical concordance.

Authors:  Lee S Schwartzberg; Hidehito Horinouchi; David Chan; Sara Chernilo; Michaela L Tsai; Dolores Isla; Carles Escriu; John P Bennett; Kim Clark-Langone; Christer Svedman; Pascale Tomasini
Journal:  NPJ Precis Oncol       Date:  2020-06-24

Review 5.  Gefitinib: a review of its use in adults with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Sohita Dhillon
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 6.  Liquid biopsy based biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer for diagnosis and treatment monitoring.

Authors:  David Pérez-Callejo; Atocha Romero; Mariano Provencio; María Torrente
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2016-10

7.  Dynamics of Plasma EGFR T790M Mutation in Advanced NSCLC: A Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Zhengquan Yang; Jialu Li; Yujie Hu; Meihua Chen; Danli Peng; Dan Zong; Qingjuan Shang; Lianqin Tao; Yanling Zhao; Yiyun Ni; Jinyan Ye; Yupeng Xie; Li Yang; Quan Lin; Chang Cai; Ning Xu; Xiaoping Huang; Xiaoting Dong; Zhonghui Zhou; Yali Yu; Zongxiao Shangguan; Yangyang Xu; Weiping Ying; Meiling Weng; Zuguo Yuan; Zhijun Dong; Jifa Li; Zhe Zheng; Jiongwei Pan; Lu Liu; Junhui Ye; Zhan Zhang; Wenfeng Li; Junfei Zhu; Shengnan Jin; Yuping Li; Chunming Ding
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.493

8.  Comparison of the Amplification Refractory Mutation System, Super Amplification Refractory Mutation System, and Droplet Digital PCR for T790 M Mutation Detection in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer after Failure of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment.

Authors:  Lucheng Zhu; Shirong Zhang; Yanping Xun; Yanping Jiang; Bing Xia; Xueqin Chen; Limin Wang; Hong Jiang; Shenglin Ma
Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res       Date:  2017-09-03       Impact factor: 3.201

9.  EGFR mutation testing practice in advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Jair Bar; Arnold Cyjon; Dov Flex; Hadas Sorotsky; Haim Biran; Julia Dudnik; Nili Peylan-Ramu; Nir Peled; Hovav Nechushtan; Maya Gips; Rivka Katsnelson; Shoshana Keren Rosenberg; Ofer Merimsky; Amir Onn; Maya Gottfried
Journal:  Lung       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.584

10.  Assessment of EGFR Mutation Status in Matched Plasma and Tumor Tissue of NSCLC Patients from a Phase I Study of Rociletinib (CO-1686).

Authors:  Chris Karlovich; Jonathan W Goldman; Jong-Mu Sun; Elaina Mann; Lecia V Sequist; Krzysztof Konopa; Wei Wen; Philipp Angenendt; Leora Horn; David Spigel; Jean-Charles Soria; Benjamin Solomon; D Ross Camidge; Shirish Gadgeel; Cloud Paweletz; Lin Wu; Sean Chien; Patrick O'Donnell; Shannon Matheny; Darrin Despain; Lindsey Rolfe; Mitch Raponi; Andrew R Allen; Keunchil Park; Heather Wakelee
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.