Literature DB >> 34217409

Women's considerations and experiences for breast cancer screening and surveillance during the COVID-19 pandemic in the United States: A focus group study.

Karen E Schifferdecker1, Danielle Vaclavik2, Karen J Wernli3, Diana S M Buist3, Karla Kerlikowske4, Brian L Sprague5, Louise M Henderson6, Dianne Johnson7, Jill Budesky7, Gloria Jackson-Nefertiti7, Diana L Miglioretti8, Anna N A Tosteson2.   

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic resulted in numerous changes in delivery of healthcare services, including breast cancer screening and surveillance. Although facilities have implemented a number of strategies to provide services, women's thoughts and experiences related to breast cancer screening and surveillance during a pandemic are not well known. This focus group study with women across seven states recruited through the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium aims to remedy this gap in information. Thirty women ranging in age from 31 to 69 participated in five virtual focus groups, eight of whom had prior breast cancer. The first three focus groups covered a range of topics related to screening and surveillance during the pandemic while the last two groups covered experiences and then a review of sample communications to women about screening and surveillance during the pandemic to obtain reactions and recommendations. More than half of the women had screening or surveillance during the pandemic. Coding and analyses resulted in nine themes in three topic areas: decision factors, screening experiences, and preferred communications. Themes included weighing the risks of COVID-19 versus cancer; feelings that screening and surveillance were mostly safe but barriers may be heightened; feeling safe when undergoing screening but receiving a range of pandemic-specific communications from none to a lot; and wanting communications that are personalized, clear and concise. Based on these findings, providers and facilities should assure women of pandemic safety measures, review methods and content of communications, and assess for barriers to screening that may be amplified during the pandemic, including anxiety and access.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34217409      PMCID: PMC8721569          DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106542

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prev Med        ISSN: 0091-7435            Impact factor:   4.018


  9 in total

1.  Three approaches to qualitative content analysis.

Authors:  Hsiu-Fang Hsieh; Sarah E Shannon
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2005-11

2.  Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium: a national mammography screening and outcomes database.

Authors:  R Ballard-Barbash; S H Taplin; B C Yankaskas; V L Ernster; R D Rosenberg; P A Carney; W E Barlow; B M Geller; K Kerlikowske; B K Edwards; C F Lynch; N Urban; C A Chrvala; C R Key; S P Poplack; J K Worden; L G Kessler
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.959

3.  Screening for Breast Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

Authors:  Albert L Siu
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2016-01-12       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Disparities in Cancer Prevention in the COVID-19 Era.

Authors:  John M Carethers; Rajarshi Sengupta; Rea Blakey; Antoni Ribas; Gypsyamber D'Souza
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2020-09-17

5.  Breast cancer screening in England and the United States: a comparison of provision and utilisation.

Authors:  Joseph Williams; Linda Garvican; Anna N A Tosteson; David C Goodman; Tracy Onega
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 3.380

6.  Disruptions in preventive care: Mammograms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Hummy Song; Alon Bergman; Angela T Chen; Dan Ellis; Guy David; Ari B Friedman; Amelia M Bond; Julie M Bailey; Ronald Brooks; Aaron Smith-McLallen
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.734

7.  ACR Statement on Safe Resumption of Routine Radiology Care During the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Pandemic.

Authors:  Matthew S Davenport; Michael A Bruno; Ramesh S Iyer; Amirh M Johnson; Ramses Herrera; Gregory N Nicola; Daniel Ortiz; Ivan Pedrosa; Bruno Policeni; Michael P Recht; Marc Willis; Margarita L Zuley; Stefanie Weinstein
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2020-05-06       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  Impact of COVID-19 on Cancer Care: How the Pandemic Is Delaying Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment for American Seniors.

Authors:  Debra Patt; Lucio Gordan; Michael Diaz; Ted Okon; Lance Grady; Merrill Harmison; Nathan Markward; Milena Sullivan; Jing Peng; Anan Zhou
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-11

9.  Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing.

Authors:  Irene Korstjens; Albine Moser
Journal:  Eur J Gen Pract       Date:  2017-12-05       Impact factor: 1.904

  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Reliable Information from Health Professionals Encourages Urban Japanese Mothers' Continued Participation in Health Checkups.

Authors:  Rumi Tsukinoki; Yoshitaka Murakami; Haruhiko Imamura; Tomonori Okamura
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-12

2.  COVID-19 Pandemic: Impact on Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Monika Rucinska; Sergiusz Nawrocki
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-09-30       Impact factor: 4.614

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.