Literature DB >> 34217337

0.9% Sodium chloride solution versus Plasma-Lyte 148 versus compound sodium lacTate solution in children admitted to PICU-a randomized controlled trial (SPLYT-P): study protocol for an intravenous fluid therapy trial.

Sainath Raman1,2, Andreas Schibler3,4, Renate Le Marsney3, Peter Trnka5, Melanie Kennedy3,4, Adrian Mattke3,4, Kristen Gibbons3, Luregn J Schlapbach3,4,6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Intravenous fluid therapy represents the most common intervention critically ill patients are exposed to. Hyperchloremia and metabolic acidosis associated with 0.9% sodium chloride have been observed to lead to worse outcomes, including mortality. Balanced solutions, such as Plasma-Lyte 148 and Compound Sodium Lactate, represent potential alternatives but the evidence on optimal fluid choices in critically ill children remains scarce. This study aims to demonstrate whether balanced solutions, when used as intravenous fluid therapy, are able to reduce the incidence of a rise in serum chloride level compared to 0.9% sodium chloride in critically ill children.
METHODS: This is a single-centre, open-label randomized controlled trial with parallel 1:1:1 assignment into three groups: 0.9% sodium chloride, Plasma-Lyte 148, and Compound Sodium Lactate solutions for intravenous fluid therapy. The intervention includes both maintenance and bolus fluid therapy. Children aged < 16 years admitted to intensive care and receiving intravenous fluid therapy during the first 4 h of admission are eligible. The primary outcome measure is a ≥ 5mmol/L increase in serum chloride level within 48 h post-randomization. The enrolment target is 480 patients. The main analyses will be intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION: This study tests three types of intravenous fluid therapy in order to compare the risk of hyperchloremia associated with normal saline versus balanced solutions. This pragmatic study is thereby assessing the most common intervention in paediatric critical care. This is a single-centre open-label study with no blinding at the level of delivery of the intervention. Certain paediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patient groups such as those admitted with a cardiac condition or following a traumatic brain injury are excluded from this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study has received ethical approval (HREC/19/QCHQ/53177: 06/06/2019). It is registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12619001244190 ) from 9th September 2019. Recruitment commenced on 12th November 2019. The primary results manuscript will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balanced solutions; Bolus; Child; Critical care; Intravenous fluid therapy

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34217337     DOI: 10.1186/s13063-021-05376-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trials        ISSN: 1745-6215            Impact factor:   2.279


  17 in total

Review 1.  Fluid Composition and Clinical Effects.

Authors:  Matt Varrier; Marlies Ostermann
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.598

Review 2.  Intravenous fluid therapy in critically ill adults.

Authors:  Simon Finfer; John Myburgh; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 28.314

3.  Randomized Double-blind Trial of Ringer Lactate Versus Normal Saline in Pediatric Acute Severe Diarrheal Dehydration.

Authors:  Gayathri Bhuvaneswaran Kartha; Ramachandran Rameshkumar; Subramanian Mahadevan
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.839

Review 4.  A critical appraisal of intravenous fluids: from the physiological basis to clinical evidence.

Authors:  David Severs; Ewout J Hoorn; Maarten B Rookmaaker
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 5.992

5.  Association Between Fluid Balance and Outcomes in Critically Ill Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rashid Alobaidi; Catherine Morgan; Rajit K Basu; Erin Stenson; Robin Featherstone; Sumit R Majumdar; Sean M Bagshaw
Journal:  JAMA Pediatr       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 16.193

6.  Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Critically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Matthew W Semler; Wesley H Self; Jonathan P Wanderer; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Li Wang; Daniel W Byrne; Joanna L Stollings; Avinash B Kumar; Christopher G Hughes; Antonio Hernandez; Oscar D Guillamondegui; Addison K May; Liza Weavind; Jonathan D Casey; Edward D Siew; Andrew D Shaw; Gordon R Bernard; Todd W Rice
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Balanced Crystalloids versus Saline in Noncritically Ill Adults.

Authors:  Wesley H Self; Matthew W Semler; Jonathan P Wanderer; Li Wang; Daniel W Byrne; Sean P Collins; Corey M Slovis; Christopher J Lindsell; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Edward D Siew; Andrew D Shaw; Gordon R Bernard; Todd W Rice
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2018-02-27       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  The history of 0.9% saline.

Authors:  Sherif Awad; Simon P Allison; Dileep N Lobo
Journal:  Clin Nutr       Date:  2008-03-03       Impact factor: 7.324

9.  Effect of a Buffered Crystalloid Solution vs Saline on Acute Kidney Injury Among Patients in the Intensive Care Unit: The SPLIT Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Paul Young; Michael Bailey; Richard Beasley; Seton Henderson; Diane Mackle; Colin McArthur; Shay McGuinness; Jan Mehrtens; John Myburgh; Alex Psirides; Sumeet Reddy; Rinaldo Bellomo
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2015-10-27       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Intravenous Fluid Prescription Practices in Critically Ill Children: A Shift in Focus from Natremia to Chloremia?

Authors:  Adrian F Bulfon; Hakem L Alomani; Natalie Anton; Brooke T Comrie; Bram Rochwerg; Sorina A Stef; Lehana Thabane; Thuva Vanniyasingam; Karen Choong
Journal:  J Pediatr Intensive Care       Date:  2019-06-19
View more
  1 in total

1.  Acetate- versus lactate-buffered crystalloid solutions: A systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.

Authors:  Karen Louise Ellekjaer; Anders Perner; Praleene Sivapalan; Morten Hylander Møller
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 2.274

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.