Literature DB >> 28422812

Randomized Double-blind Trial of Ringer Lactate Versus Normal Saline in Pediatric Acute Severe Diarrheal Dehydration.

Gayathri Bhuvaneswaran Kartha1, Ramachandran Rameshkumar, Subramanian Mahadevan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of Ringer lactate (RL) versus normal saline (NS) in the correction of pediatric acute severe diarrheal dehydration, as measured by improvement in clinical status and pH (≥7.35).
METHODS: A total of 68 children ages 1 month to 12 years with acute severe diarrheal dehydration (World Health Organization [WHO] classification) were randomized into RL (n = 34) and NS groups (n = 34) and received 100 mL/kg of the assigned intravenous fluid according to WHO PLAN-C for the management of diarrheal dehydration. The primary outcome was an improvement in clinical status and pH (≥7.35) at the end of 6 hours. Secondary outcomes were changes in serum electrolytes, renal and blood gas parameters, the volume of fluid required for dehydration correction excluding the first cycle, time to start oral feeding, hospital stay, and cost-effectiveness analysis.
RESULTS: Primary outcome was achieved in 38% versus 23% (relative risk = 1.63, 95% confidence interval 0.80-3.40) in RL and NS groups, respectively. No significant differences were observed in secondary outcomes in electrolytes, renal, and blood gas parameters. None required second cycle of dehydration correction. Median (interquartile range) time to start oral feeding (1.0 [0.19-2.0] vs 1.5 [0.5-2.0] hours) and hospital stay (2.0 [1.0-2.0] vs 2.0 [2.0-2.0] days) was similar. The median total cost was higher in RL than NS group ((Equation is included in full-text article.)120 [(Equation is included in full-text article.)120-(Equation is included in full-text article.)180] vs (Equation is included in full-text article.)55 [(Equation is included in full-text article.)55-(Equation is included in full-text article.)82], P ≤ 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In pediatric acute severe diarrheal dehydration, resuscitation with RL and NS was associated with similar clinical improvement and biochemical resolution. Hence, NS is to be considered as the fluid of choice because of the clinical improvement, cost, and availability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28422812     DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr        ISSN: 0277-2116            Impact factor:   2.839


  4 in total

1.  Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children.

Authors:  Alba M Antequera Martín; Jesus A Barea Mendoza; Alfonso Muriel; Ignacio Sáez; Mario Chico-Fernández; José M Estrada-Lorenzo; Maria N Plana
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-07-19

2.  Balanced Versus Unbalanced Fluid in Critically Ill Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Anab Rebecca Lehr; Soha Rached-d'Astous; Nick Barrowman; Anne Tsampalieros; Melissa Parker; Lauralyn McIntyre; Margaret Sampson; Kusum Menon
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 3.971

3.  0.9% Sodium chloride solution versus Plasma-Lyte 148 versus compound sodium lacTate solution in children admitted to PICU-a randomized controlled trial (SPLYT-P): study protocol for an intravenous fluid therapy trial.

Authors:  Sainath Raman; Andreas Schibler; Renate Le Marsney; Peter Trnka; Melanie Kennedy; Adrian Mattke; Kristen Gibbons; Luregn J Schlapbach
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 2.279

4.  Impact of balanced versus unbalanced fluid resuscitation on clinical outcomes in critically ill children: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Anab Rebecca Lehr; Soha Rached-d'Astous; Melissa Parker; Lauralyn McIntyre; Margaret Sampson; Jemila Hamid; Kusum Menon
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2019-08-05
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.