Literature DB >> 34216544

Replication gaps are a key determinant of PARP inhibitor synthetic lethality with BRCA deficiency.

Ke Cong1, Min Peng1, Arne Nedergaard Kousholt2, Wei Ting C Lee3, Silviana Lee1, Sumeet Nayak1, John Krais4, Pamela S VanderVere-Carozza5, Katherine S Pawelczak6, Jennifer Calvo1, Nicholas J Panzarino1, John J Turchi7, Neil Johnson4, Jos Jonkers2, Eli Rothenberg3, Sharon B Cantor8.   

Abstract

Mutations in BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) is synthetic lethal with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). Lethality is thought to derive from DNA double-stranded breaks (DSBs) necessitating BRCA function in homologous recombination (HR) and/or fork protection (FP). Here, we report instead that toxicity derives from replication gaps. BRCA1- or FANCJ-deficient cells, with common repair defects but distinct PARPi responses, reveal gaps as a distinguishing factor. We further uncouple HR, FP, and fork speed from PARPi response. Instead, gaps characterize BRCA-deficient cells, are diminished upon resistance, restored upon resensitization, and, when exposed, augment PARPi toxicity. Unchallenged BRCA1-deficient cells have elevated poly(ADP-ribose) and chromatin-associated PARP1, but aberrantly low XRCC1 consistent with defects in backup Okazaki fragment processing (OFP). 53BP1 loss resuscitates OFP by restoring XRCC1-LIG3 that suppresses the sensitivity of BRCA1-deficient cells to drugs targeting OFP or generating gaps. We highlight gaps as a determinant of PARPi toxicity changing the paradigm for synthetic lethal interactions.
Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1/BRCA2; Fanconi anemia (FA); Okazaki fragment processing; PARP inhibitor; fork protection; homologous recombination; parylation; replication gaps; ssDNA; synthetic lethal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34216544      PMCID: PMC9089372          DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2021.06.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell        ISSN: 1097-2765            Impact factor:   19.328


  129 in total

1.  The DNA helicase BRIP1 is defective in Fanconi anemia complementation group J.

Authors:  Marieke Levitus; Quinten Waisfisz; Barbara C Godthelp; Yne de Vries; Shobbir Hussain; Wouter W Wiegant; Elhaam Elghalbzouri-Maghrani; Jûrgen Steltenpool; Martin A Rooimans; Gerard Pals; Fré Arwert; Christopher G Mathew; Małgorzata Z Zdzienicka; Kevin Hiom; Johan P De Winter; Hans Joenje
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2005-08-21       Impact factor: 38.330

2.  High speed of fork progression induces DNA replication stress and genomic instability.

Authors:  Apolinar Maya-Mendoza; Pavel Moudry; Joanna Maria Merchut-Maya; MyungHee Lee; Robert Strauss; Jiri Bartek
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 3.  The role of DNA single- and double-strand breaks in cell killing by ionizing radiation.

Authors:  P L Olive
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.841

4.  Base excision repair defects invoke hypersensitivity to PARP inhibition.

Authors:  Julie K Horton; Donna F Stefanick; Rajendra Prasad; Natalie R Gassman; Padmini S Kedar; Samuel H Wilson
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2014-04-25       Impact factor: 5.852

5.  A Dominant Mutation in Human RAD51 Reveals Its Function in DNA Interstrand Crosslink Repair Independent of Homologous Recombination.

Authors:  Anderson T Wang; Taeho Kim; John E Wagner; Brooke A Conti; Francis P Lach; Athena L Huang; Henrik Molina; Erica M Sanborn; Heather Zierhut; Belinda K Cornes; Avinash Abhyankar; Carrie Sougnez; Stacey B Gabriel; Arleen D Auerbach; Stephen C Kowalczykowski; Agata Smogorzewska
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 17.970

6.  Fork reversal and ssDNA accumulation at stalled replication forks owing to checkpoint defects.

Authors:  José M Sogo; Massimo Lopes; Marco Foiani
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-07-26       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 7.  PARP Inhibitors: Extending Benefit Beyond BRCA-Mutant Cancers.

Authors:  Patrick G Pilié; Carl M Gay; Lauren A Byers; Mark J O'Connor; Timothy A Yap
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-13       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  The DNA damage response and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Christopher J Lord; Alan Ashworth
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Replication fork reversal triggers fork degradation in BRCA2-defective cells.

Authors:  Sofija Mijic; Ralph Zellweger; Nagaraja Chappidi; Matteo Berti; Kurt Jacobs; Karun Mutreja; Sebastian Ursich; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Andre Nussenzweig; Pavel Janscak; Massimo Lopes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 14.919

10.  Human RECQ1 promotes restart of replication forks reversed by DNA topoisomerase I inhibition.

Authors:  Matteo Berti; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Saravanabhavan Thangavel; Shivasankari Gomathinayagam; Sasa Kenig; Marko Vujanovic; Federico Odreman; Timo Glatter; Simona Graziano; Ramiro Mendoza-Maldonado; Francesca Marino; Bojana Lucic; Valentina Biasin; Matthias Gstaiger; Ruedi Aebersold; Julia M Sidorova; Raymond J Monnat; Massimo Lopes; Alessandro Vindigni
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 15.369

View more
  26 in total

1.  Filling in the gaps in PARP inhibitor-induced synthetic lethality.

Authors:  Mariana Paes Dias; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2021-12-06

2.  WRN rescues replication forks compromised by a BRCA2 deficiency: Predictions for how inhibition of a helicase that suppresses premature aging tilts the balance to fork demise and chromosomal instability in cancer.

Authors:  Arindam Datta; Robert M Brosh
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 4.653

3.  Revisiting the BRCA-pathway through the lens of replication gap suppression: "Gaps determine therapy response in BRCA mutant cancer".

Authors:  Sharon B Cantor
Journal:  DNA Repair (Amst)       Date:  2021-08-13

4.  Loss of nuclear DNA ligase III reverts PARP inhibitor resistance in BRCA1/53BP1 double-deficient cells by exposing ssDNA gaps.

Authors:  Mariana Paes Dias; Vivek Tripathi; Ingrid van der Heijden; Ke Cong; Eleni-Maria Manolika; Jinhyuk Bhin; Ewa Gogola; Panagiotis Galanos; Stefano Annunziato; Cor Lieftink; Miguel Andújar-Sánchez; Sanjiban Chakrabarty; Graeme C M Smith; Marieke van de Ven; Roderick L Beijersbergen; Jirina Bartkova; Sven Rottenberg; Sharon Cantor; Jiri Bartek; Arnab Ray Chaudhuri; Jos Jonkers
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 5.  The Role of PARP Inhibitors in Patients with Primary Malignant Central Nervous System Tumors.

Authors:  Susan E Gueble; Juan C Vasquez; Ranjit S Bindra
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2022-10-15

Review 6.  Exploiting replication gaps for cancer therapy.

Authors:  Ke Cong; Sharon B Cantor
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2022-05-13       Impact factor: 19.328

Review 7.  Joining the PARty: PARP Regulation of KDM5A during DNA Repair (and Transcription?).

Authors:  Anthony Sanchez; Bethany A Buck-Koehntop; Kyle M Miller
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2022-05-09       Impact factor: 4.653

Review 8.  Towards a CRISPeR understanding of homologous recombination with high-throughput functional genomics.

Authors:  Samuel B Hayward; Alberto Ciccia
Journal:  Curr Opin Genet Dev       Date:  2021-09-25       Impact factor: 5.578

Review 9.  Homologous Recombination as a Fundamental Genome Surveillance Mechanism during DNA Replication.

Authors:  Julian Spies; Hana Polasek-Sedlackova; Jiri Lukas; Kumar Somyajit
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  The trans cell cycle effects of PARP inhibitors underlie their selectivity toward BRCA1/2-deficient cells.

Authors:  Antoine Simoneau; Rosalinda Xiong; Lee Zou
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2021-08-12       Impact factor: 11.361

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.