Literature DB >> 26631151

Beyond the point of no return: effects of visual distractors on saccade amplitude and velocity.

Antimo Buonocore1, Robert D McIntosh2, David Melcher3.   

Abstract

Visual transients, such as a bright flash, reduce the proportion of saccades executed, ∼60-125 ms after flash onset, a phenomenon known as saccadic inhibition (SI). Across three experiments, we apply a similar time-course analysis to the amplitudes and velocities of saccades. Alongside the expected reduction of saccade frequency in the key time period, we report two perturbations of the "main sequence": one before and one after the period of SI. First, saccades launched between 30 and 70 ms, following the flash, were hypometric, with peak speed exceeding that expected for a saccade of similar amplitude. This finding was in contrast to the common idea that saccades have passed a "point of no return," ∼60 ms before launching, escaping interference from distractors. The early hypometric saccades observed were not a consequence of spatial averaging between target and distractor locations, as they were found not only following a localized central flash (experiment 1) but also following a spatially generalized flash (experiment 2). Second, across experiments, saccades launched at 110 ms postflash, toward the end of SI, had normal amplitude but a peak speed higher than expected for that amplitude, suggesting increased collicular excitation at the time of launching. Overall, the results show that saccades that escape inhibition following a visual transient are not necessarily unaffected but instead, can reveal interference in spatial and kinematic measures.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Keywords:  eye movements; main sequence; saccadic inhibition

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26631151     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00939.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  6 in total

1.  Rapid accumulation of inhibition accounts for saccades curved away from distractors.

Authors:  Devin H Kehoe; Mazyar Fallah
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Alteration of the microsaccadic velocity-amplitude main sequence relationship after visual transients: implications for models of saccade control.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Chih-Yang Chen; Xiaoguang Tian; Saad Idrees; Thomas A Münch; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Eye Position Error Influence over "Open-Loop" Smooth Pursuit Initiation.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Julianne Skinner; Ziad M Hafed
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Saccadic inhibition in a guided saccade task.

Authors:  Isabel Dombrowe
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.984

5.  Face perception influences the programming of eye movements.

Authors:  Louise Kauffmann; Carole Peyrin; Alan Chauvin; Léa Entzmann; Camille Breuil; Nathalie Guyader
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-01-24       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Time-dependent inhibition of covert shifts of attention.

Authors:  Antimo Buonocore; Niklas Dietze; Robert D McIntosh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-07-03       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.