| Literature DB >> 34216216 |
Diego Aguilar-Ramirez1, Jesus Alegre-Díaz2, William G Herrington1,3, Natalie Staplin1,3, Raúl Ramirez-Reyes2, Louisa Gnatiuc1, Michael Hill1,3, Frederik Romer1, Jason Torres1, Eirini Trichia1, Rachel Wade1,3, Rory Collins1, Jonathan R Emberson1,3, Pablo Kuri-Morales2, Roberto Tapia-Conyer2.
Abstract
CONTEXT: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) and diabetes are associated with dyslipidemia, metabolic abnormalities, and atherosclerotic risk. Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provides much more detail on lipoproteins than traditional assays.Entities:
Keywords: Mexico; diabetes; kidney function; metabolic measures; nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34216216 PMCID: PMC8475241 DOI: 10.1210/clinem/dgab497
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 0021-972X Impact factor: 5.958
Figure 1.Plasma lipid and metabolic measures quantified by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Abbreviations: Apo-A1, apolipoprotein A1; Apo B, apolipoprotein B; HDL, high density lipoprotein; HDL-D, HDL particle diameter; IDL, intermediate density lipoprotein; LDL, low density lipoprotein; LDL-D, LDL particle diameter; VLDL, very low density lipoprotein; VLDL-D, VLDL particle diameter. *Per the high-throughput NMR-metabolomics platform developed by Nightingale Health Ltd (21).
Characteristics of adults aged 35 to 84 years by eGFR categories in individuals with and without diabetes at recruitment
| Individuals with diabetes ( | Individuals without diabetes ( | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ( | eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ( | All with diabetes ( | eGFR ≥ 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ( | eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 ( | All without diabetes (n = 31 678) | All participants ( | |
| eGFR, mL/min/1.73 m2 | 100 (14) | 38 (16) | 97 (19) | 102 (13) | 46 (15) | 102 (14) | 101 (15) |
| Age | 58 (11) | 65 (9) | 58 (11) | 50 (12) | 69 (12) | 50 (12) | 52 (12) |
| Male sex | 2214 (36%) | 101 (33%) | 2315 (36%) | 11 334 (36%) | 121 (33%) | 11 455 (36%) | 13 770 (36%) |
| Resident of Coyoacán | 5398 (89%) | 263 (86%) | 5661 (88%) | 28 338 (90%) | 303 (83%) | 28 641 (90%) | 34 302 (90%) |
| University/college educated | 457 (7%) | 8 (3%) | 465 (7%) | 5225 (17%) | 26 (7%) | 5251 (17%) | 5716 (15%) |
| Current smoker | 1472 (24%) | 40 (13%) | 1512 (24%) | 9381 (30%) | 48 (13%) | 9429 (30%) | 10 941 (29%) |
| Anthropometry, blood pressure, and HbA1c | |||||||
| Body-mass index, kg/m2 | 29.3 (5.2) | 27.7 (4.7) | 29.2 (5.2) | 28.6 (4.8) | 28.5 (4.8) | 28.6 (4.8) | 28.7 (4.8) |
| Waist-hip ratio | 0.93 (0.07) | 0.93 (0.08) | 0.93 (0.07) | 0.90 (0.08) | 0.94 (0.08) | 0.90 (0.08) | 0.90 (0.08) |
| SBP, mmHg | 136 (18) | 150 (25) | 136 (19) | 128 (16) | 141 (22) | 128 (17) | 129 (17) |
| HbA1c (%) | 8.6 (6.8-10.7) | 7.2 (6.3-9.1) | 8.5 (6.8-10.7) | 5.4 (5.1-5.5) | 5.4 (5.2-5.6) | 5.4 (5.1-5.5) | 5.4 (5.2-5.8) |
| Self-reported comorbidities | |||||||
| Cardiovascular disease | 289 (5%) | 33 (11%) | 322 (5%) | 721 (2%) | 29 (8%) | 750 (2%) | 1072 (3%) |
| Chronic kidney disease | 76 (1%) | 39 (13%) | 115 (2%) | 281 (1%) | 29 (8%) | 310 (1%) | 425 (1%) |
Values are mean (SD), n (%), or median (interquartile range). The glomerular filtration rate was estimated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation and NMR-measured creatinine that was recalibrated to a reference creatinine measured by isotope dilution mass spectrometry available in a subset of participants. Pearson’s correlation coefficients for NMR- and IDMS-measured creatinine were r = 0.89 (n = 282) [see Supplementary Figure 1 in (36)]. Mean (SD) NMR-measured and recalibrated creatinine values were (following the order of the columns): 63 (12), 160 (174), 64 (25), 606 (13), 183 (137), 66 (42), and 64 (28) umol/L. Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; HbA1c, glycosylated haemoglobin; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
Figure 2.Workflow for identifying associations of low kidney function (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m Associations between low kidney function and NMR measures were assessed separately in people with and without diabetes using linear regression models adjusted for age, sex, district of residence, educational level, smoking, and fasting duration. A false discovery rate–adjusted P-value < 0.05 was considered as evidence against the null hypothesis. NMR measures nomenclature is defined in Figure 1.
Figure 3.Comparison of associations of low kidney function (eGFR < 60 mL/min/1.73 m Linear regression models are adjusted for age, sex, educational level, district of residence, smoking, fasting duration, and batch number. Point estimates for each association are available in Supplementary Table 4 in (36). NMR measures nomenclature is defined in Figure 1. Abbreviations: eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FDR, false discovery rate. NMR, nuclear magnetic resonance.
Figure 4.Qualitative changes in lipoprotein and lipid measures associated with low kidney function shared among people with and without diabetes. NMR measures nomenclature defined in Figure 1.