OBJECTIVES: Primary care providers report a lack of resources as a barrier to managing adolescent obesity. Mobile health applications (apps) may be helpful in weight management; however, adolescents' preferences for weight management app features are unknown. Our objectives were to provide insight into adolescents' preferred weight management app features and elicit facilitators and barriers to app use. METHODS: Using the qualitative content analysis method, 14 interviews with adolescents with overweight/obesity were conducted in rural and urban pediatric offices in South Carolina. Eligibility criteria included being 13 to 17 years old, having a body mass index at or above the 85th percentile for age and sex, and having access to a smartphone or tablet. Semistructured key informant interviews were conducted from May to October 2017. Participants were presented with three popular mobile health apps and asked to complete tasks and comment on their various features and usability. Summative content analysis coding was performed on interview transcripts, and interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of participants were from a rural practice, 64% were White, and 86% had a body mass index higher than the 95th percentile. Familiarity with similar apps and accessibility of apps on their smartphones promoted app use. The need for wireless Internet, operating difficulties, or privacy concerns were barriers. Nutritional education, physical activity tracking, and social connection were desirable app features. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents have expressed preferred app features to help them manage weight; however, further work is needed to see whether these features are effective.
OBJECTIVES: Primary care providers report a lack of resources as a barrier to managing adolescent obesity. Mobile health applications (apps) may be helpful in weight management; however, adolescents' preferences for weight management app features are unknown. Our objectives were to provide insight into adolescents' preferred weight management app features and elicit facilitators and barriers to app use. METHODS: Using the qualitative content analysis method, 14 interviews with adolescents with overweight/obesity were conducted in rural and urban pediatric offices in South Carolina. Eligibility criteria included being 13 to 17 years old, having a body mass index at or above the 85th percentile for age and sex, and having access to a smartphone or tablet. Semistructured key informant interviews were conducted from May to October 2017. Participants were presented with three popular mobile health apps and asked to complete tasks and comment on their various features and usability. Summative content analysis coding was performed on interview transcripts, and interviews were conducted until thematic saturation was reached. RESULTS: Seventy-one percent of participants were from a rural practice, 64% were White, and 86% had a body mass index higher than the 95th percentile. Familiarity with similar apps and accessibility of apps on their smartphones promoted app use. The need for wireless Internet, operating difficulties, or privacy concerns were barriers. Nutritional education, physical activity tracking, and social connection were desirable app features. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents have expressed preferred app features to help them manage weight; however, further work is needed to see whether these features are effective.
Authors: William C Livingood; David Monticalvo; Jay M Bernhardt; Kelli T Wells; Todd Harris; Kadra Kee; Johnathan Hayes; Donald George; Lynn D Woodhouse Journal: Health Educ Behav Date: 2016-11-02
Authors: Judith de Niet; Reinier Timman; Stephanie Bauer; Erica van den Akker; Cora de Klerk; Hans Kordy; Jan Passchier Journal: Health Psychol Date: 2012-04-02 Impact factor: 4.267
Authors: Thomas H Inge; Wendy C King; Todd M Jenkins; Anita P Courcoulas; Mark Mitsnefes; David R Flum; Bruce M Wolfe; Alfons Pomp; Greg F Dakin; Saurabh Khandelwal; Meg H Zeller; Mary Horlick; John R Pender; Jia-Yuh Chen; Stephen R Daniels Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2013-11-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Karandeep Singh; Kaitlin Drouin; Lisa P Newmark; Malina Filkins; Elizabeth Silvers; Paul A Bain; Donna M Zulman; Jae-Ho Lee; Ronen Rozenblum; Erika Pabo; Adam Landman; Elissa V Klinger; David W Bates Journal: JMIR Mhealth Uhealth Date: 2016-12-19 Impact factor: 4.773
Authors: Susan C Weller; Ben Vickers; H Russell Bernard; Alyssa M Blackburn; Stephen Borgatti; Clarence C Gravlee; Jeffrey C Johnson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-06-20 Impact factor: 3.240