Literature DB >> 34214266

Seroprevalence of arboviruses in Ecuador: Implications for improved surveillance.

Ernesto Gutiérrez-Vera1, Leandro Patiño2, Martha Castillo-Segovia3, Víctor Mora-Valencia4, Julio Montesdeoca-Agurto5, Mary Regato-Arrata6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Arthropod-borne viruses (arboviruses) cause morbidity and mortality in humans and domestic animals worldwide. The percentage of population immunity or susceptibility to these viruses in Ecuador is unknown.
OBJECTIVES: To investigate the proportion of Ecuadorian populations with IgG antibodies (Abs) (past exposure/immunity) and IgM Abs (current exposure) against flaviviruses and alphaviruses and to study the activity of these viruses in Ecuador.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: During 2009-2011, we conducted a serosurvey for selected arboviruses in humans (n=1,842), equines (n=149), and sentinel hamsters (n=84) at two coastal locations and one in the Amazon basin (Eastern Ecuador) using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and hemagglutination inhibition test.
RESULTS: From 20.63% to 63.61% of humans showed IgG-antibodies for the flaviviruses: Dengue virus (DENV), yellow fever virus (YFV) Saint Louis encephalitis virus, and West Nile virus (WNV); from 4.67% to 8.63% showed IgG-Abs for the alphaviruses: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, eastern equine encephalitis virus, and western equine encephalitis virus. IgM-Abs were found for DENV and WNV. Equines and hamsters showed antibodies to alphaviruses in all locations; two hamsters seroconverted to YFV in the Amazonia.
CONCLUSIONS: The results show a YFV vaccination history and suggest the activity of arboviruses not included in the current surveillance scheme. Enhanced arbovirus and mosquito surveillance, as well as continued YFV vaccination and evaluation of its coverage/effectiveness, are recommended.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arbovirus; yellow fever virus; West Nile virus; dengue virus; encephalitis virus; Venezuelan equine; Eastern equine

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34214266      PMCID: PMC8382292          DOI: 10.7705/biomedica.5623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomedica        ISSN: 0120-4157            Impact factor:   0.935


Arbovirus is an ecological term applied to viruses transmitted by arthropods, particularly mosquitoes and ticks . Most arboviruses are maintained in enzootic cycles and are transmitted between mosquitos and vertebrates. Humans become infected and may develop diseases ranging from subclinical or mild infections to systemic febrile illness, hemorrhagic fever, and meningoencephalitis . Examples of arboviral diseases include yellow fever, Zika, and dengue fever, which have reemerged or increased their geographic range causing public health emergencies and urging governments to enhance their surveillance programs and research . Around 534 arboviruses have been described, and at least 135 of them are of medical concern ,. Almost all arboviruses have RNA genomes and are classified into nine families and nine genera ,; arbovirus species of current medical importance in South America belong to Flavivirus (Flaviviridae), Alphavirus (Togaviridae), and Orthobunyavirus (Perybunyaviridae) genera . In Ecuador, three flaviviruses (yellow fever virus, YFV, dengue virus, DENV, and Zika virus, ZIKV) and two alphaviruses (Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus, VEEV, and Chikungunya virus, CHIKV) have caused epidemic outbreaks -. YFV has two well-recognized transmission cycles: urban and sylvatic . Recognized urban epidemics occurred in 1842, 1853-1856, 1867-1869, 1877-1878 and 1880 . Urban YF was eradicated in Ecuador in 1919 , but sylvatic YF has been documented since 1949 in Amazonian basin provinces ,. Vaccination campaigns against YFV have been conducted in Ecuador since 1944, particularly in the Amazonian and coastal provinces. DENV caused the first epidemic in 1988 and currently, it is the most commonly detected arbovirus . ZIKV and CHIKV are more recent introductions; the first epidemics by these viruses occurred in 2014 and 2016, respectively. VEEV has caused two major epidemics, one in 1969 and the other in 1972; as usual for this virus, epidemic outbreaks were preceded by an epizootic event in equines ,. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the 1969 outbreak caused 20,000 cases and 200 fatalities in Ecuador . Subsequently, a major outbreak of VEEV was reported in Guatemala, Central America, northern México, and Texas in the United States of America. The introduction of the epidemic subtype from Ecuador to Guatemala was speculated, but no convincing mechanism was identified . Later, it was shown that the different outbreaks originated from a residual live virus in incompletely formalin-inactivated vaccines ,. Other arboviruses of medical concern have also been reported in Ecuador. They include the Saint Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV), the West Nile virus (WNV), and the Ilheus virus (ILHV) belonging to the Flavivirus genus; the eastern equine encephalitis virus (EEEV), the western equine encephalitis virus (WEEV), and the Mayaro virus (MAYV) from the Alphavirus genus, and the Oropouche virus (OROV) belonging to the Orthobunyavirus genus -. SLEV, EEEV, and WEEV were isolated from sentinel hamsters and mosquitoes between 1974 and 1978 . Then, SLEV as well as ILHV, OROV, MAYV, and VEEV were reported after the detection of specific antibodies (Abs) in febrile humans sampled in the Ecuadorian Amazonia in 1997 and between 2001 and 2004 -. ILHV and OROV were later isolated from febrile patients of the Ecuadorian Coast and the Amazonia, respectively ,. WNV and EEEV have been reported by the detection of specific Abs in horses of the Ecuadorean Coast: WNV from healthy equines sampled between 2007 and 2009 and EEEV from two equines showing neurological signs sampled in 2013 ,. Eight other enzootic arboviruses have been isolated in Ecuador and named according to the local geographic region where they were found, but little is known about their medical importance . One example is the “Playas virus”, of which two strains (75V3066 and 75V938) are classified as Cache Valley virus and one (75V5758) as Maguari virus, both belonging to the genus Orthobunyavirus and associated with human disease . Serosurveys are a key tool for determining the proportion of individuals exposed and of those with immunity to infectious agents, as well as for the detection of subclinical infections . In Ecuador, little is known about these aspects of arboviruses. The surveillance activities of the Ministerio de Salud Pública - MSP (Ministry of Public Health) are focused on the diagnosis of DENV, YFV, CHIKV, and ZIKV, mainly using nucleic acid detection; other arboviruses are surveyed using generic primers, a method with intrinsic limitations that may lead to missing arboviruses of medical concern. In this study, we aimed to investigate the proportion of three Ecuadorian populations with IgG Abs (past exposure/immunity) against selected flaviviruses and alphaviruses. This population included conscripts of a military fort of the Ecuadorian Amazonia recently vaccinated against YFV with the “YFV-17D” vaccine. We also determined the percentage of IgM Abs (recent exposure) against DENV and WNV in febrile and healthy individuals to look for clinical and subclinical infections. Finally, we emphasize the importance of widening and strengthening arbovirus surveillance in Ecuador.

Materials and methods

Ethical statement

This project was approved by the institutional review board of the Instituto Nacional de Higiene y Medicina Tropical “Dr. Leopoldo Izquieta Pérez” (INHMTLI) now Instituto Nacional de Investigación en Salud Pública. Human samples were collected under verbal informed consent. Domestic animals were sampled given owner consent and supervision. Hamsters were used as sentinel species in the field and suckling mice “Balb/C4” were required for inoculation of hamster tissue and mosquito pools. Hamsters and mice were grown and housed at the laboratory animal facility of INHMTLI, which has adequate infrastructure to guarantee animal welfare and dedicated personnel for cage cleaning and animal feeding. After exposure/inoculation, the animals were euthanized using chloroform as an inhaled anesthetic. All these procedures were performed in strict accordance with the institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals. We followed the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and the “Public Health Service Policy on Humane Care and Use of Laboratory Animals” published by the National Institute of Health of the United States of America.

Sampling and sampling location

This study comprised serum samples of humans and equines for arbovirus seroprevalence analysis, serum samples of hamsters for arbovirus seroconversion analysis, mosquito pools, and hamster tissues for viral isolation. Sampling was performed from 2009 to 2011 at three locations in Ecuador, two in the coastal region (Santa Elena Province-Manglaralto and Los Ríos Province-Vinces) and one in the Amazonia basin (Pastaza Province- Puyo) (figure 1). Manglaralto and Vinces were chosen for the presence of marshes and wetlands that contribute to the presence of mosquitoes. Puyo is in the Amazon rainforest, where many arboviruses circulate in their natural cycles. Hamsters were exposed as sentinel species at each sampling location for one week. During the study period, each location was visited six times, more or less every three months. The number of human samples collected by location is shown in figure 1. Detailed information on the number of human samples, sentinel hamsters, equines, and mosquitoes collected by location and date is shown in table S1.
Figure 1

Sampling sites and number of human samples collected. Santa Elena Province-Manglaralto (N=496), Los Ríos Province-Vinces (N=474), and Pastaza Province-Puyo (N=872: 293 civilians and 579 conscripts)

Table S1

Number of samples of humans, sentinel hamsters, equines, and mosquitoes collected by location and date

Location*Collection dateSamples
HumansSentinel HamstersEsquinesMosquitoes
Vinces9-13/3/0911550278
Manglaralto25-27/3/0954515266
Vinces25-30/5/09120520722
Puyo7-11/9/092447034
Manglaralto21-25/9/09129721243
Puyo26-30/10/091497108
Vinces1-5/02/2010396065,318
Manglaralto22-26/03/201046517281
Puyo3-7/05/2010945084
Vinces19-23/07/2010575111,301
Manglaralto20-24/09/2010105614308
Puyo18-22/10/20101776530
Puyo14-18/2/20111035215
Vinces21-25/3/201143593,212
Manglaralto16-20/5/20117751382
Puyo22-26/8/20111056065
Manglaralto26-30/9/201185514709
Vinces21-25/11/2011100537549
Total 1,84210018673,505

* The samples were collected from the following sites: Vinces: Hospital Nicolás Cotto Infante, Subcentro de Salud San Lorenzo de Vinces, Isla de Bejucal, Subcentro de Salud Antonio Sotomayor, Abras de Mantequilla, El Recuerdo, Puerto Nuevo, Campo Alegre, Playones La Luz, Palenque, San Miguel de Palenque, Haciendas La María y El Rocío. Manglaralto: Hospital de Manglaralto, -Dos Mangas-, Santa María del Fiat, Haciendas San Francisco, El Edén y La Carmela, Fincas Lauricel Rodríguez, Manuel Baque y Benito Chiquito, - Olón-, Finca El Retiro, -La entrada-, Finca La Española: Puyo: Subcentro de Salud El Dorado, Fuerte Militar Amazonas-Brigada de Selva 17 Pastaza-Shell, Hospital Provincial de Puyo, Quesería 10 de Agosto, Recinto Fátima, Reserva de monos, Depósito de agua potable

The procedure for sampling humans and domestic animals is described by Beaty, et al. . The human population sampled was expected to have been vaccinated against YFV in different immunization campaigns. In one location (Puyo), we sampled conscripts of the Jungle Brigade 17 Pastaza (Amazonas Military Fort), who had all recently been vaccinated with YFV- 17D. Two different groups of conscripts were sampled three times during the year of their stay in the military fort to evaluate IgG Abs against YFV and their seroprevalence to other flaviviruses. Mosquitoes were trapped with CDC light traps supplemented with CO2 and then frozen in dry ice and transported to the laboratory.

Laboratory analysis

Seroprevalence/seroconversion to arbovirus was evaluated mainly through the analysis of IgG Abs. For humans, each sample was analyzed against a battery of arboviruses comprising DENV, YFV, SLEV, WNV, EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV. Only monotypic results were considered positive for the corresponding virus. IgG Abs against DENV and WNV were evaluated by commercial ELISA methods of PANBIO (Windsor, Queensland, Australia, specificity 81.6 - 97.2% and sensitivity 73.9 - 85.1%) and FOCUS (Cypress, CA, USA, specificity 97% and sensitivity 36%), respectively. IgG Abs against YFV, SLEV, EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV were evaluated with in-house ELISAs following Johnson, et al.. Sucrose-acetone-extracted suckling mouse brain antigens and positive serum against these viruses were donated by the CDC’s National Center of Infectious Diseases, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases (Fort Collins, CO, United States of America). IgM Abs against WNV and DENV were also analyzed in individuals who were febrile at the time of sampling or reported to be febrile one or two weeks before sampling (table S2). Since arboviruses also cause subclinical infections, IgM Abs against these viruses were further analyzed in a subset of nonfebrile individuals using commercial ELISAs of PANBIO (specificity: 85.4 - 98.9%; sensitivity: 46.6 - 64.7%) and FOCUS (specificity: 100%; sensitivity: 100%), as described above. Positive and negative serum samples were included for the respective ELISA test. The IBM SPSS Statistics package for Windows, version XX (IBM Corp., Armonk, N.Y., USA), was used for frequency analysis of monotypic samples according to individual age.
Table S2

Number of febrile patients (n) per sampling location analyzed for IgM Abs against WNV and DENV and percentage of reactive samples

Locationn (female/ male)WNV IgM* % of positives (number of positives/n)DENV IgM % of positives (number of positives/n)
Vinces69 (36/33)1.66 (1/60)0 (0/60)
Manglaralto20 (16/4)5.55 (1/18)0 (0/18)
Puyo13 (3/10)0 (0/13)30.76 (4/13)
Total102 (55/47)1.96 (2/102)4.65 (4/86)
Equine and hamster IgG Abs were evaluated with the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test on kaolin-adsorbed sera according to the technique of Clarke, et al., adapted to microtiter plates and following the procedures described in the document Técnicas de laboratorio para el diagnóstico y la caracterización de los virus del dengue. The test was conducted for EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV, and nine hamsters were also evaluated for YFV. We used the same antigens donated by the CDC. A shortage of antigens did not allow testing other arboviruses or more hamsters for YFV. An HI titer of 1:20 or higher inhibiting hemagglutination produced by four antigen units was considered positive. Hamsters - (table S1) were analyzed before and after their exposure at the sampling site . After exposure, hamsters were euthanized and their tissues (brain, heart, lungs, kidneys, liver, spleen, and skeletal muscle) were processed for IC inoculation in suckling mice Balb/C4 and analyzed by RT-PCR. Mosquitoes were identified, classified, and grouped by species. Spearman correlation was carried out using SPSS to test the relationship between the number of mosquitoes captured by species and location and the proportion of human samples showing IgG Abs reactive against the arboviruses tested. This nonparametric test was chosen given that the proportion of samples having Abs was calculated on categorical data (yes/no). Mosquitoes pooled by species in groups of 50 were crushed in a sterile environment and processed for intracerebral (IC) inoculation in suckling mice Balb/C4 and RT-PCR analysis. RT-PCR for flaviviruses and alphaviruses was conducted on samples from febrile humans, hamster tissues, and mosquito pools according to Ayers, et al. and Sánchez-Seco, et al., respectively.

Results

Analysis of IgG Abs against selected arboviruses was performed on 1,842 human sera. We found Abs for all the viruses investigated: DENV, YFV, SLEV, WNV, EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV. The percentages of Abs against different arboviruses in 1,263 samples (without including conscripts) are shown in Table 1. The flaviviruses showed the highest seroprevalence with WNV (63.61%), followed by YFV (62.67%), SLEV (52.29%), and DENV (20.63%); the alphaviruses showed the lowest prevalence, particularly WEEV (4.67%). Some samples reacted with only one of the viruses tested (monotypic samples): WNV: 58, SLEV: 20, EEEV: 54, VEEV: 64, and WEEV: 18. The frequency of monotypic samples according to the age of the patient is shown in figures S1-S5. Individuals between 2 and 82 years of age showed monotypic reactions.
Table 1

Percentages of Abs against the arbovirus evaluated in the civilian population (conscripts not included), N=1,223 to 1,263. The number of samples analyzed varied depending on sample or reagent availability.

VirusPercentage(Positivies/analyzed)
DENV20,63(260/1,260)
YFV62,67(769/1,227)
SLEV51,29(635/1,238)*
WNV63,61(778/1,223)*
EEEV8,63(109/1,263)*
WEEV4,67(59/1,263)*
VEEV7,60(96/1,263)*

DENV: Dengue virus, YFV: Yellow fever Virus, SLEV: Saint Louis encephalitis Virus, WNV: West Nile encephalitis Virus, EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus, WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus, VEEV: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus

* There were monotipic results as follows: WNV 69 (34 Vinces, 21 Manglaralto, and 14 Puyo); SLEV 20 (5 Vinces, 2 Manglaralto, 13 Puyo); EEEV (11 Vinces, 39 Manglaralto, 4 Puyo); WEEV (3 Vinces, 10 Manglaralto, 5 Puyo); VEEV (25 Vinces, 23 Manglaralto, 16 Puyo).

Figure S1

Frequency of monotypic samples of WNV according to patient age

Figure S5

Frequency of monotypic samples of EEEV according to according to patient age

DENV: Dengue virus, YFV: Yellow fever Virus, SLEV: Saint Louis encephalitis Virus, WNV: West Nile encephalitis Virus, EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus, WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus, VEEV: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus * There were monotipic results as follows: WNV 69 (34 Vinces, 21 Manglaralto, and 14 Puyo); SLEV 20 (5 Vinces, 2 Manglaralto, 13 Puyo); EEEV (11 Vinces, 39 Manglaralto, 4 Puyo); WEEV (3 Vinces, 10 Manglaralto, 5 Puyo); VEEV (25 Vinces, 23 Manglaralto, 16 Puyo). The results of IgG analysis by location are shown in figure 2. A total of 474 samples were studied in Vinces; the highest seroprevalence was found for WNV, 63.59% (276/434), and the lowest was for WEEV, 4.85% (23/474). In Manglaralto, we screened 496 samples. The highest seroprevalence was found for WNV, 87.7% (435/496), and the lowest for WEEV, 5.84% (29/496). In Puyo, we analyzed 872 samples comprising 293 samples from the civilian population and 579 from conscripts. For the civilian population, the highest seroprevalence was found for YFV, 52.75% (153/290), and the lowest for WEEV, 2.38% (7/293). Puyo is one of the Amazonian provinces subject to regular YFV vaccination.
Figure 2

Percentage of civilian people with IgG Abs against selected flaviviruses and alphaviruses in three locations of Ecuador, method used: ELISA. DENV: Dengue virus, YFV: Yellow fever virus, SLEV: Saint Louis encephalitis virus, WNV: West Nile virus, EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus, WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus, VEEV: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus

The percentage of conscripts with IgG Abs against arbovirus is shown in figure 3a and b. Two groups (group 1: 61 individuals and group 2: 67 individuals) recently vaccinated against YFV were sampled three times. For group 1, the percentage of response to the vaccine was 85.05% and between 23.15% and 37.84% showed Abs against DENV, WNV, and SLEV. In group 2, 81.31% showed Abs against YFV, and between 5.90% and 42.74% showed Abs against DENV, WNV, and SLEV.
Figure 3

Percentage of conscripts developing IgG Abs against YFV and other selected flaviviruses during the year after being vaccinated with YFV- 17D. Two groups of conscripts (a and b) from the Amazonian Military Fort “Selva Pastaza 17” were sampled and analyzed for the mentioned virus at three different times of the year. The percentage of conscripts with Abs against YFV increased with time. Method used, ELISA. WNV: West Nile virus; DENV: Dengue virus, SLEV: Saint Louis encephalitis virus, YFV: Yellow fever virus. a) First group of conscripts. b) Second group of conscripts. Each bar shows the increasing percentage of Abs for each virus during the three sampling periods.

A total of 102 individuals were registered as febrile and analyzed for IgM Abs against WNV and DENV, and the detailed results are shown in Table S2. Four individuals from Puyo (30.76%-4/13) showed IgM Abs reactive against DENV, one in the civilian population, and three in the second group of conscripts (two were positive in the second sampling and the other in the third sampling). Two samples showed monotypic IgM Abs-reactive against WNV: one from a 19-year-old female in Vinces (1.66%-1/60) and another from a 53- year old woman in Manglaralto (5.55% -1/18). A total of 1,343 samples of nonfebrile individuals (including conscripts) were analyzed for IgM Abs against DENV of which 5.06% (18/356) in Vinces, 2.42% (12/496) in Manglaralto, and 7.94% (39/491) in Puyo showed Abs. A total of 893 samples of nonfebrile individuals (including conscripts) analyzed for IgM Abs against WNV demonstrated 0.20% (1/496) positivity from Manglaralto and 0.20% (1/491) positivity from Puyo. The HI results are shown in tables S3 and S4; 149 equines were analyzed. Hemagglutination-inhibiting Abs were found for all the antigens evaluated at serum dilutions of 1:20-1:1280. Counting the monotypic results and the highest dilution showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination in heterotypic reactions, 1.34% (2/149) of equines demonstrated Abs to EEEV, 5.37% (8/149) to WEEV, and 6.04% (9/149) to VEEV across all sampling sites. Abs to EEEV were found in Vinces, Abs to WEEV were detected in Vinces and Manglaralto, and Abs against VEEV were detected in all the locations sampled. Hemagglutination-inhibiting Abs at higher serum dilutions were found for WEEV in one animal in Vinces (1:1280) (table S3).
Table S3

Equines showing Abs to Alphavirus by HI test of N=149. EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus; WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus; VEEV: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. The reciprocal of the highest dilution of serum showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination is shown for each virus. *= monotypic reactions, ** highest dilution showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination in heterotypic reactions

Sample CodeDateEEEVWEEVVEEVLocation
EGV78924/09/200940040Manglaralto
EGV79124/09/200940040Manglaralto
EGV 223928/09/201140040Manglaralto
EGV 224028/09/201120020Manglaralto
EGV 224128/09/2011202040**Manglaralto
EGV197918/05/2011020*0Manglaralto
EGV201019/05/2011020*0Manglaralto
EGV201219/05/2011020*0Manglaralto
EGV22926/03/20090020*Manglaralto
EGV114525/03/20100040*Manglaralto
EGV 226229/09/20110040*Manglaralto
EGV32127/05/2009408080Vinces
EGV32227/05/200940*00Vinces
EGV32327/05/2009808080Vinces
EGV32427/05/2009408080Vinces
EGV32827/05/200916080160Vinces
EGV32927/05/20091601,280**80Vinces
EGV33027/05/2009408080Vinces
EGV33127/05/2009160320**40Vinces
EGV33227/05/200940320**40Vinces
EGV33327/05/200940320**0Vinces
EGV33427/05/200940160**40Vinces
EGV129220/07/201040*00Vinces
EGV31827/05/200904040Vinces
EGV32627/05/200902020Vinces
EGV33527/05/2009080160**Vinces
EGV129020/07/2010002 0*Vinces
EGV188523/03/20110020*Vinces
EGV188823/03/20110040*Vinces
EGV171121/10/20100040*Puyo
Table S4

Hamsters showing Abs against Alphavirus by HI test of N=84 after exposure in the field. EEEV: Eastern equine encephalitis virus; WEEV: Western equine encephalitis virus; VEEV: Venezuelan equine encephalitis virus. The reciprocal of the highest dilution of serum showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination is shown for each virus. *= monotypic reactions, ** highest dilution showing complete inhibition of hemagglutination in heterotypic reactions

Sample codeDateEEEVWEEVVEEVLocation
EGV116325/03/201020*00Manglaralto
EGV116525/03/201020*00Manglaralto
EGV151324/09/201020020Manglaralto
EGV151424/09/201080*00Manglaralto
EGV151524/09/201080*00Manglaralto
EGV151624/09/201040**020Manglaralto
EGV151724/09/201020020Manglaralto
EGV151824/09/201040*00Manglaralto
EGV201831/05/2011404020Manglaralto
EGV 227130/09/201120040**Manglaralto
EGV201931/05/201102040**Manglaralto
EGV82925/09/20090020*Manglaralto
EGV83025/09/20090020*Manglaralto
EGV83225/09/20090020*Manglaralto
EGV116425/03/20100020*Manglaralto
EGV201531/05/20110020*Manglaralto
EGV201631/05/20110040*Manglaralto
EGV201731/05/20110020*Manglaralto
EGV 227330/09/20110020*Manglaralto
EGV107505/02/201020*00Vinces
EGV107705/02/201020*00Vinces
EGV137323/07/201020*00Vinces
EGV137423/07/201020020Vinces
EGV137623/07/201040*00Vinces
EGV191825/03/201120*00Vinces
EGV107805/02/20100040*Vinces
EGV137423/07/201020020Vinces
EGV137723/07/20100020*Vinces
EGV65711/09/20091,280**020Puyo
EGV128007/05/201020*00Puyo
EGV128307/05/201040*00Puyo
EGV128407/05/201040*00Puyo
EGV171722/10/201040**020Puyo
EGV171822/10/201080**020Puyo
EGV171922/10/201040*00Puyo
EGV172022/10/201020*00Puyo
EGV 214901/09/201120*00Puyo
EGV65311/09/20090020*Puyo
EGV65511/09/20090040*Puyo
EGV65811/09/20090020*Puyo
EGV172222/10/20100020*Puyo
EGV174416/02/20110080*Puyo
EGV174516/02/20110040*Puyo
EGV183717/02/20110020*Puyo
A total of 84 hamsters were used as sentinels. After exposure in the field, 22.62% of them demonstrated Abs to EEEV (18.51% -5/27 in Vinces, 15.63% -5/32 in Manglaralto, and 25.71% -9/35 in Puyo), 20.24% showed Abs to VEEV (7.41% -2/27 in Vinces, 31.25% -10/32 in Manglaralto, and 20% -7/35 in Puyo), and 2.38% seroconverted to YFV (22.22% -2/9 in Puyo) (table S4). Hemagglutination-inhibiting Abs at higher serum dilutions were found for YFV in one hamster in Puyo (1:640) and for EEEV in two hamsters in Manglaralto (1:1280). None of the hamsters became sick. A total of 73,505 mosquitoes were captured. The number by locality and species is described in table S5. The most common species was Culex (Mel) spp. (N=63.057). The most abundant by location were Culex (Mel) spp. in Vinces (N=62.736), Aedes (Stg) aegypti in Manglaralto (N=912), and Coquillettidia venezuelensis in Puyo (N=160). Correlation results are shown in table S6. There was a very strong negative correlation (ρ=-1, p≥0.1) between Psorophora ferox and samples with Abs against DENV, SLEV, WNV, EEV, WEEV, and between C. venezuelensis or A. albimanus and samples showing Abs for YFV (ρ=-1 p≥0.1). A strong positive correlation was found between Mansonia pseudotitilians/indubitans or Anopheles (Nys) triannulatus and the proportion of individuals showing Abs against VEEV (ρ=1, p≥0.1). There was a positive correlation between A. aegypti and DENV, SLEV, WNV, EEV, and WEEV, but it was not significant. A list of mosquito species identified in this study and the arboviruses they harbor according to viral isolation studies elsewhere is shown in table S7.
Table S5

Number of mosquitoes per genus and species captured in the locations studied

SpeciesVincesManglaraltoPuyoTotal
Trichoprosopon digitatum 0077
Culex (Mel) spp.62,7322933263,057
Ochlerotatus serratus 2,325507272,859
Aedeomyia squamipennis 26110262
Psorophora (Jan) ferox 1056
Mansonia pseudotitilians/indubitans 4,2347204,306
Coquillettidia venezuelensis 1,47601601,636
Aedes (Stg) aegypti 09120912
Anopheles (Nys) albimanus 321437
Anopheles (Nys) triannulatus 319141334
Anopheles (Nys) pseudopunctipennis 085085
Anopheles (Nys) nuneztovari 0404
Total71,3801,88923673,505
Table S6

Spearman correlation of the number of mosquitoes captured by species and the proportion of human samples showing IgG Abs reactive against DENV, SLEV, WNV, YFV, EEV, WEEV, and VEEV

Virus and statistics estimates Mosquitoes especies
Td C_spO_sA_sPs_spM_spCq_vAe_aAn_aAn_tAn_pse An_nun
Spearman’s rhoDENVCorrelation coefficient -0.8660.5000.5000.500-1,000**0.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.3330.6670.6670.667 0.6670.6670.3330.6670.6670.3330.333
N 333333333333
Sampling simulationBias Standard error 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Confidence interval 95%Lower limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Upper limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
SLEVCorrelation coefficient -0.8660.5000.5000.500-1,000**0.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.3330.6670.6670.667 0.6670.6670.3330.6670.6670.3330.333
N 333333333333
Sampling simulationBias Standard error 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Confidence interval 95%Lower limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Upper limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
WNVCorrelation coefficient -0.8660.5000.5000.500-1,000**0.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.3330.6670.6670.667 0.6670.6670.3330.6670.6670.3330.333
N 333333333333
Sampling simulationBias Standard error 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Confidence interval 95%Lower limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Upper limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
YFVCorrelation coefficient 0.000-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-1,000**0.866-1,000**-0.5000.8660.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 1.0000.6670.6670.6670.6670.667 0.333 0.6670.3330.333
N 333333333333
Sampling simulationBias Standard error 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Confidence interval 95%Lower limit0.000-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-1.0000.866-1.000-0.5000.8660.866
Upper limit0.000-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-0.500-1.0000.866-1.000-0.5000.8660.866
EEEVCorrelation coefficient -0.8660.5000.5000.500-1,000**0.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.3330.6670.6670.667 0.6670.6670.3330.6670.6670.3330.333
N 333333333333
Sampling simulationBias Standard error 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Confidence interval 95%Lower limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Upper limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
WEEVCorrelation coefficient -0.8660.5000.5000.500-1,000**0.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.3330.6670.6670.667 0.6670.6670.3330.6670.6670.3330.333
N 333333333333
Sampling simulationBias Standard error 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Confidence interval 95%Lower limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
Upper limit-0.8660.5000.5000.500-1.0000.500-0.5000.866-0.5000.5000.8660.866
VEEVCorrelation coefficient -0.8661,000**1,000**1,000**-0.5001,000**0.5000.0000.5001,000**0.0000.000
Sig. (2-tailed) 0.333 0.667 0.6671.0000.667 1.0001.000
N 333333333333
Sampling simulationBias Standard error 0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
0.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.0000.000
Confidence interval 95%Lower limit-0.8661.0001.0001.000-0.5001.0000.5000.0000.5001.0000.0000.000
Upper limit-0.8661.0001.0001.000-0.5001.0000.5000.0000.5001.0000.0000.000

** Correlation is significant at 0,01 Sig. (2-tailed).

Simulation was based on 1,000 replicates.

Table S7

Mosquito species identified in this study and the arboviruses they harbor according to viral isolation studies elsewhere*

Mosquitos species Arbovirus carriedReference
Trichoprosopon digitatum Pixuna virus and Wyeomyia virus. Bussuquara, SLEV and ILHV have been isolated from mixed pools that included this species.(1-2)
Culex (Mel) spp. WNV, VEEV, VESL, Japanese Encephalitis virus(3)
Ochlerotatus serratus OROV, YFV, ILHV (4-6)
Aedeomyia squamipennis Gamboa virus, VEEV(7,8)
Psorophora (Jan) ferox Rocio virus 9
Mansonia pseudotitilians/indubitans VEEV 10
Coquillettidia venezuelensis MAYV, OROV y SLEV, WNV(11-12)
Aedes (Stg) aegypti DENV, YFV, ZKV, CHKV 13
Anopheles (Nys) albimanus Not known
Anopheles (Nys) triannulatus Not known
Anopheles (Nys) pseudopunctipennis Not known
Anopheles (Nys) nuneztovari Not known
TOTALNot known

*This is not an exhaustive list of arboviruses carried by mosquitoes

RT-PCR analysis of 128 mosquito pools and 119 hamster tissues did not lead to the amplification of Flavivirus or Alphavirus RNA. We inoculated 807 suckling Balb/C mice, 576 with hamster tissue and 231 with suspensions of polled mosquitoes. No virus was isolated.

Discussion

Serosurvey of arboviruses is constrained by Ab cross-reactivity because of antigenic similarities between members of the same virus family cocirculating in the same region. The plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) is the gold standard for the specific detection of Abs, but it is difficult to implement in resource-limited countries. ELISA and HIA tests are valuable alternatives when monotypic results are accounted for. Using these techniques, we report the percentage of individuals with IgG Abs reactive against DENV, YFV, WNV, SLEV, EEEV, WEEV, and VEEV and with IgM Abs reactive against DENV and WNV. We found monotypic results for WNV, SLEV, and each of the encephalitis viruses evaluated while the frequency was found in individuals of different ages. We also demonstrated the seroconversion of naive sentinel hamsters to the EEEV and VEEV in all sampling locations and for YFV in Amazonia. Mosquito genera recognized as vectors of arboviruses were found in all locations studied. We discuss our findings in the context of arboviruses whose activity has been confirmed in Ecuador and with the current surveillance schemes. Monotypic IgG Abs against WNV were found in Manglaralto-Santa Elena Province and Vinces-Los Ríos Province (N=58: 34 Vinces, 24 Manglaralto). IgM Abs against this virus were also found in two IgG-positive samples, one from Manglaralto and one from Vinces. The result in Vinces is consistent with the finding of specific IgG Abs against this virus in equines sampled during 2007-2009 by Coello ; thus, it is probable that WNV infection occurred in humans in this region during these years. The confirmation of human infection would require the use of PNRT; however, these findings warrant further investigation of the activity of this virus in humans, vectors, and potential reservoirs. Serosurvey of birds in Guayaquil (a coastal city around 100 km from Vinces) did not find evidence of WNV infection at this location during 2011 . Analysis of SLEV showed 20 monotypic results (2 in Manglaralto, 13 in Puyo, and 5 in Vinces). From 1974 to 1978, SLEV was isolated on the Ecuadorian Coast from Culex nigripalpus mosquitoes (isolated 76 V-1177 and 24684) collected in Huertas Negras-Tenguel/Guayas and Puerto Nuevo- Vinces/Los Ríos and sentinel hamsters (isolated 78V-5682) exposed in Playas/Guayas (20). From 2001 to 2004, specific IgM Abs against this virus were found in febrile patients sampled from Ecuadorian Amazonia . A higher percentage of Abs was found against YFV, which was probably due to YFV vaccination history. Overall, the civilian population showed ~60% Abs against YFV, with Puyo showing a higher percentage of civilian people with YFV Abs (52.75%). In conscripts, the percentage of Abs was between 81.31% and 85.05%, which is not optimal but agrees with vaccine efficacy percentages ,. Two hamsters seroconverted to YFV in Puyo, which added to the cases of sylvatic yellow fever occurring in Ecuadorian Amazonia showing the active circulation of the virus in this region and the presence of susceptible people. According to information provided by the MSP, mass preventive YFV vaccination in Ecuador was performed in 1944, 1975, 1997, 2005, and 2016, and data about routine immunization of infants have been publicly available since 2007 . A worldwide analysis of YFV vaccination from 1970 to 2016 shows a cumulative vaccination coverage of ~ 60% in the Ecuadorian Amazonia and of ~ 30% in the entire country and recommends reaching the 80% threshold to prevent or control outbreaks. Regarding Alphavirus, we found IgG Abs reactive against VEEV, EEEV, and WEEV in humans and equines and Abs to VEEV and EEEV in naive hamsters. All these viruses were isolated in Ecuador by Calisher, et al. between 1974 and 1978 . VEEV comprises six antigenic subtypes (I-VI) of which I-AB and I-C are associated with epizootic/epidemic activity in equines and humans while other serotypes circulate in natural enzootic cycles . The epidemic subtype IB (now I-AB) and the enzootic 1-D have been reported in Ecuador; IB, in particular, was reported from a horse showing neurological disease in 1944 and during the outbreak of 1969 . The isolates from 1969 were antigenically similar to those causing outbreaks in Central and North America and likely originated from incompletely formalin-inactivated vaccines ,. IgM Abs against VEEV have been detected in Ecuadorian individuals since 1958, then in 1960, and from febrile patients sampled during 2000-2004 . The emergence of epizootic/epidemic strains from enzootic VEEV has also been shown and justifies surveillance attention ,. For EEEV, specific IgM Abs were detected in two equines showing neurological signs from Chongón, Guayas Province, in 2013 . EEEV circulating in South America is now known as Madariaga virus and has been linked to neurologic disease in humans and horses . WEEV has not been reported to cause epizootics or epidemics in Ecuador. As regards mosquitoes, most of the species/genera identified in this study are known vectors of arboviruses elsewhere (table S7). For example, some Culex species are vectors of WNV, SLEV, and VEEV, and the presence of these mosquitoes in all locations is consistent with the finding of Abs against the viruses they transmit. A. aegypti, the main vector of DENV, was found only in Manglaralto, although Abs against dengue were found in all locations. The absence of this mosquito species in the other locations studied could be due to sampling bias; in Manglaralto, traps were placed near human settlements and in Puyo and Vinces they were placed in more forested areas. Correlation data between species and the proportion of human individuals showing IgG Abs against arbovirus should be interpreted with caution because few locations were analyzed (N=3). Anopheles nuneztovari has not been reported in Ecuador before, but this species is difficult to identify and will need further confirmation. Anopheles are not usual vectors for arboviruses, but the finding of unreported species highlights the importance of carrying out more studies on mosquitoes. By 2009-2012, arboviral surveillance in Ecuador comprised DENV and YFV through ELISA and nucleic acid detection. After the arrival of ZIKV and CHIKV and the confirmation of OROV, the surveillance was extended to these viruses. Following our results, a percentage of negative samples are currently analyzed for VEEV, EEEV, and MAYV by RT-PCR. Given the emergence and reemergence of arboviral diseases worldwide and their continuous spread, we strongly recommend widening the analysis and surveillance of other arboviruses, especially those isolated previously or detected in febrile patients in the country. These must include the arbovirus surveyed here but also the ILHV and the Playas virus. This last virus, isolated in Ecuador in 1974-1978, is genetically similar to the Cache Valley virus and the Maguari virus, which have been reported to cause human disease. Likewise, we emphasize the need for updated studies and surveillance of mosquito ecology and their vectorial capacity for arbovirus transmission. We also urge for the establishment of a set of recommendations given by the Global Arbovirus Group of Experts (GAGE) , which include strengthening laboratory capacity through the implementation of multiplex diagnostic tests reliable for differential diagnosis, access to viral isolation, sequencing, and genotyping, and encouraging the development of research programs to study the mechanism of arboviral evolution, emergence, and dispersal. Implementation of viral isolation would allow phenotypic characterization and availability of reagents for serological studies, which, in its turn, will reduce the dependence on international reference centers for local diagnosis . A constraint of this research was the lack of a local method for the specific analysis of Abs, such as PNRT, which requires cell culture, a procedure used intermittently by the MSP surveillance laboratories. Sequencing and genotyping could now be approached through genomic technologies, whole genome sequencing, and the simultaneous analysis of several samples making it useful for rapid outbreak investigations, viral phylogeography, and evolutionary studies -. Improving epidemiological surveillance and implementation of the recommendations provided by the GAGE could be achieved locally and regionally by promoting collaboration between public laboratories and academia, as recommended by Miranda, et al.; this approach would be particularly useful for developing countries where infrastructure and technical and economic resources are scarce.
  43 in total

1.  Detection of anti-arboviral immunoglobulin G by using a monoclonal antibody-based capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Authors:  A J Johnson; D A Martin; N Karabatsos; J T Roehrig
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  A generic nested-RT-PCR followed by sequencing for detection and identification of members of the alphavirus genus.

Authors:  M P Sánchez-Seco; D Rosario; E Quiroz; G Guzmán; A Tenorio
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.014

Review 3.  RNA virus genomics: a world of possibilities.

Authors:  Edward C Holmes
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 4.  Epidemic arboviral diseases: priorities for research and public health.

Authors:  Annelies Wilder-Smith; Duane J Gubler; Scott C Weaver; Thomas P Monath; David L Heymann; Thomas W Scott
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 25.071

5.  Evolutionary patterns of eastern equine encephalitis virus in North versus South America suggest ecological differences and taxonomic revision.

Authors:  Nicole C Arrigo; A Paige Adams; Scott C Weaver
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Yellow fever virus in Haemagogus leucocelaenus and Aedes serratus mosquitoes, southern Brazil, 2008.

Authors:  Jader da C Cardoso; Marco A B de Almeida; Edmilson dos Santos; Daltro F da Fonseca; Maria A M Sallum; Carlos A Noll; Hamilton A de O Monteiro; Ana C R Cruz; Valeria L Carvalho; Eliana V Pinto; Francisco C Castro; Joaquim P Nunes Neto; Maria N O Segura; Pedro F C Vasconcelos
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.883

7.  Global yellow fever vaccination coverage from 1970 to 2016: an adjusted retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Freya M Shearer; Catherine L Moyes; David M Pigott; Oliver J Brady; Fatima Marinho; Aniruddha Deshpande; Joshua Longbottom; Annie J Browne; Moritz U G Kraemer; Kathleen M O'Reilly; Joachim Hombach; Sergio Yactayo; Valdelaine E M de Araújo; Aglaêr A da Nóbrega; Jonathan F Mosser; Jeffrey D Stanaway; Stephen S Lim; Simon I Hay; Nick Golding; Robert C Reiner
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 25.071

8.  Genomic and epidemiological monitoring of yellow fever virus transmission potential.

Authors:  N R Faria; M U G Kraemer; S C Hill; J Goes de Jesus; R S Aguiar; F C M Iani; J Xavier; J Quick; L du Plessis; S Dellicour; J Thézé; R D O Carvalho; G Baele; C-H Wu; P P Silveira; M B Arruda; M A Pereira; G C Pereira; J Lourenço; U Obolski; L Abade; T I Vasylyeva; M Giovanetti; D Yi; D J Weiss; G R W Wint; F M Shearer; S Funk; B Nikolay; V Fonseca; T E R Adelino; M A A Oliveira; M V F Silva; L Sacchetto; P O Figueiredo; I M Rezende; E M Mello; R F C Said; D A Santos; M L Ferraz; M G Brito; L F Santana; M T Menezes; R M Brindeiro; A Tanuri; F C P Dos Santos; M S Cunha; J S Nogueira; I M Rocco; A C da Costa; S C V Komninakis; V Azevedo; A O Chieppe; E S M Araujo; M C L Mendonça; C C Dos Santos; C D Dos Santos; A M Mares-Guia; R M R Nogueira; P C Sequeira; R G Abreu; M H O Garcia; A L Abreu; O Okumoto; E G Kroon; C F C de Albuquerque; K Lewandowski; S T Pullan; M Carroll; T de Oliveira; E C Sabino; R P Souza; M A Suchard; P Lemey; G S Trindade; B P Drumond; A M B Filippis; N J Loman; S Cauchemez; L C J Alcantara; O G Pybus
Journal:  Science       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Zika and Chikungunya virus detection in naturally infected Aedes aegypti in Ecuador.

Authors:  Varsovia Cevallos; Patricio Ponce; Jesse J Waggoner; Benjamin A Pinsky; Josefina Coloma; Cristina Quiroga; Diego Morales; Maria José Cárdenas
Journal:  Acta Trop       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 3.112

10.  A single tube RT-PCR assay for the detection of mosquito-borne flaviviruses.

Authors:  M Ayers; D Adachi; G Johnson; M Andonova; M Drebot; R Tellier
Journal:  J Virol Methods       Date:  2006-05-02       Impact factor: 2.014

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.