Literature DB >> 34213578

Augmented reality through head-mounted display for navigation of baseplate component placement in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study.

Philipp Kriechling1, Rafael Loucas2, Marios Loucas2, Fabio Casari2, Philipp Fürnstahl3, Karl Wieser2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To achieve an optimal clinical outcome in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), accurate placement of the components is essential. The recently introduced navigation technology of augmented reality (AR) through head-mounted displays (HMD) offers a promising new approach to visualize the anatomy and navigate component positioning in various orthopedic surgeries. We hypothesized that AR through HMD is feasible, reliable, and accurate for guidewire placement in RSA baseplate positioning.
METHODS: Twelve human cadaver shoulders were scanned with computed tomography (CT) and RSA baseplate positioning was 3-D planned using dedicated software. The shoulders were prepared through a deltopectoral approach and an augmented reality hologram was superimposed using the HMD Microsoft HoloLense. The central guidewire was then navigated through the HMD to achieve the planned entry point and trajectory. Postoperatively, the shoulders were CT-scanned a second time and the deviation from the planning was calculated.
RESULTS: The mean deviation of the entry point was 3.5 mm  ± 1.7 mm (95% CI 2.4 mm; 4.6 mm). The mean deviation of the planned trajectory was 3.8°  ± 1.7° (95% CI 2.6°; 4.9°).
CONCLUSION: Augmented reality seems feasible and reliable for baseplate guidewire positioning in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The achieved values were accurate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Augmented reality; Cadaveric; Experimental; Head-mounted display; Navigation; Orthopedic surgery; Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 34213578     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-04025-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  21 in total

1.  Inferior tilt of the glenoid component does not decrease scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty: results of a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  T Bradley Edwards; George J Trappey; Clayton Riley; Daniel P O'Connor; Hussein A Elkousy; Gary M Gartsman
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 3.019

2.  Increasing incidence of shoulder arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Sunny H Kim; Barton L Wise; Yuqing Zhang; Robert M Szabo
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2011-12-21       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  Prevalence and projections of total shoulder and elbow arthroplasty in the United States to 2015.

Authors:  Judd S Day; Edmund Lau; Kevin L Ong; Gerald R Williams; Matthew L Ramsey; Steven M Kurtz
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 4.  Problems, complications, reoperations, and revisions in reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review.

Authors:  Matthias A Zumstein; Miguel Pinedo; Jason Old; Pascal Boileau
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.019

5.  Effects of glenoid component version on humeral head displacement and joint reaction forces: an experimental study.

Authors:  Richard W Nyffeler; Ralph Sheikh; Todd S Atkinson; Hilaire A C Jacob; Philippe Favre; Christian Gerber
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.019

6.  Effects of tilt and glenosphere eccentricity on baseplate/bone interface forces in a computational model, validated by a mechanical model, of reverse shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Sergio Gutiérrez; Matthew Walker; Matthew Willis; Derek R Pupello; Mark A Frankle
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 3.019

Review 7.  Benefit of intraoperative navigation on glenoid component positioning during total shoulder arthroplasty.

Authors:  Patrick Sadoghi; Julia Vavken; Andreas Leithner; Patrick Vavken
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  National utilization of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  William W Schairer; Benedict U Nwachukwu; Stephen Lyman; Edward V Craig; Lawrence V Gulotta
Journal:  J Shoulder Elbow Surg       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.019

9.  Use of Patient-Specific Instrumentation (PSI) for glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Guillaume Villatte; Anne-Sophie Muller; Bruno Pereira; Aurélien Mulliez; Peter Reilly; Roger Emery
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Applicability of augmented reality in orthopedic surgery - A systematic review.

Authors:  Lukas Jud; Javad Fotouhi; Octavian Andronic; Alexander Aichmair; Greg Osgood; Nassir Navab; Mazda Farshad
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-02-15       Impact factor: 2.362

View more
  3 in total

1.  Glenoid Component Placement Assisted by Augmented Reality Through a Head-Mounted Display During Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty.

Authors:  J Tomás Rojas; Alexandre Lädermann; Sean Wei Loong Ho; Mustafa S Rashid; Matthias A Zumstein
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2022-04-22

2.  Augmented Reality-Based Surgery on the Human Cadaver Using a New Generation of Optical Head-Mounted Displays: Development and Feasibility Study.

Authors:  Behrus Puladi; Mark Ooms; Martin Bellgardt; Mark Cesov; Myriam Lipprandt; Stefan Raith; Florian Peters; Stephan Christian Möhlhenrich; Andreas Prescher; Frank Hölzle; Torsten Wolfgang Kuhlen; Ali Modabber
Journal:  JMIR Serious Games       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 3.364

Review 3.  Augmenting Performance: A Systematic Review of Optical See-Through Head-Mounted Displays in Surgery.

Authors:  Mitchell Doughty; Nilesh R Ghugre; Graham A Wright
Journal:  J Imaging       Date:  2022-07-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.