| Literature DB >> 34212127 |
Marco Verolino1, Piergiacomo Grassi2, Gennaro Sosto1, Gaetano D'Onofrio1, Stefania De Simone3, Ciro Costagliola4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: To introduce Lean approach principles in the management of patients undergoing intravitreal injections (IVIs) for wet age-related macular degeneration.Entities:
Keywords: Intravitreal Injection Centre; Lean methodology; age-related macular degeneration; anti-VEGF; intravitreal injection; patient care management
Year: 2021 PMID: 34212127 PMCID: PMC8216374 DOI: 10.1177/25158414211018893
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ther Adv Ophthalmol ISSN: 2515-8414
Anonymous five-question patients’ feedback questionnaire filled out at each discharge as indicator of the patient’s perceived outcome.
| Patients’ anonymous feedback questionnaire | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| As-was (mean ± SD) | IVIC (mean ± SD) |
| |
| Reply rate (%) | 55% | 92% | |
| 1. Invitation letter | 7.27 ± 2.52 (1–10) | 9.11 ± 0.42 (1–10) | 0.00006 |
| 2. Waiting time | 5.89 ± 1.97 (1–10) | 8.05 ± 1.23 (1–10) | <0.00001 |
| 3. Procedure | 7.21 ± 1.93 (1–10) | 8.89 ± 0.56 (1–10) | 0.00001 |
| 4. Post-operative instructions | 6.57 ± 0.79 (1–10) | 9.06 ± 0.45 (1–10) | <0.00001 |
| 5. Discharge | 5.47 ± 1.97 (1–10) | 8.69 ± 0.84 (1–10) | <0.00001 |
| Overall grade | 6.48 ± 0.71 (1–10) | 8.76 ± 0.38 (1–10) | <0.00001 |
| Satisfied patients who rated their experience ⩾8/10 (%) | 45% | 95% | 0.00105 (chi-square test) |
IVIC, Intravitreal Injection Centre; SD, standard deviation.
Data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) and range (1–10) in patients who received intravitreal injections at the previous Medical Retina Unit and at the Intravitreal Injection Centre (IVIC). Patient satisfaction was recorded by five-question questionnaire having each variable graded from 1 to 10. One-tailed Student’s t-test was used to compare the statistically significant differences in continuous variables, whereas chi-square test was used to compare statistically significant differences in categorical variables among all subgroups, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 1.Plan of the new Intravitreal Injection Centre layout.
Comparison between the previous Medical Retina Unit and the new Intravitreal Injection Centre setting.
| Outcome measure | Medical Retina Unit | Intravitreal Injection Centre | Statistic test and |
|---|---|---|---|
| Total distance of flow (m) | 315 m | 72 m | |
| Elevator or stairs (times) | 2 | 0 | |
| Sessions days per week | 2 | 5 | |
| IVIs slots per session | 15 ± 2 | 72 ± 2.94 | |
| Mean time ± standard deviation (SD) between registration and discharge | 240 ± 14.14 min | 60 ± 8.16 min | |
| Mean number of patients treated in a 6-h shift ± SD | 20 ± 4.08 | 50 ± 7.07 | |
| Mean turnover time ± SD in between patients at the OT | 10 ± 1.41 min | 8 ± 2 min | |
| Booking options | Booking through Sole Booking Centre | Direct booking from GP | |
| Percentage of performed IVIs on the monthly scheduled IVIs | 60% | 100% | |
| Number of critical incidents or near-misses reported | 1 | 0 | |
| Percentage of satisfied patients rating IVIC ⩾8/10 points | 45% | 95% | |
| Examination | BCVA anterior segment and dilated fundoscopy examination | BCVA anterior segment and dilated fundoscopy examination, macular OCT and OCT-A, tonometry | |
| Medical records | Paper | Paper + electronic medical records stored in personalized patients’ folders |
BCVA, best-corrected visual acuity; GP, general practitioner; IVIC, Intravitreal Injection Centre; OCT, optical coherence tomography; OCT-A, OCT angiography; OT, operating theatres; SD, standard deviation.