Meningiomas are common intracranial neoplasms and arise from the arachnoid cap cells
of the leptomeninges. The neoplasms account for approximately 13–40% of intracranial
neoplasms, making them the second most common intracranial tumors in adults with an
incidence of 1.5–5.5 per 100,000.[1,2] Currently, the majority of
meningiomas are evaluated preoperatively using conventional MRI with gadolinium-DTPA
enhancement. However, 15% of meningiomas exhibit atypical MRI features such as
ring-like enhancement and parenchymal invasion, resembling malignant brain lesions
such as gliomas or metastatic brain tumors.[3-5] Advanced MRI techniques,
including diffusion weighted imaging (DWI), susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI),
perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI), and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS),
provide specific physiologic information that is not available by conventional MRI
alone.[3,6-8]Proton MRS studies of meningiomas have shown an increase in alanine (Ala), glutamate
(Glu) –glutamine (Gln) complex (Glx) and choline (Cho) and a decrease in
N-acetylaspartate (NAA), creatine (Cr), myoinositol (mI) and lipid (Lip).[9-13] Ala has been shown to be
characteristic for intracranial meningiomas,[11,14] although several meningiomas
lack the Ala.[9,13,15-19] Glx are also commonly present
in meningiomas. The resonance peaks of Glx are contributed from its α, β, and γ
proton groups, respectively. Several reports demonstrated elevation of Glx in
meningiomas compared to other brain masses.[13,16,20-22] However, Ala and Glx
concentrations are not always easy to evaluate during clinical practice.
Peak at 3.8 ppm on short TE spectra has also been demonstrated as a distinct
metabolic feature for the differentiation of meningiomas among other cerebral
lesions.[13,15-17,20,23] As for NAA,
several authors have mentioned that meningiomas may have endogenous N-acetyl
compounds (NACs) except for NAA and may produce an elevated peak around
2.02 ppm.[15,17] Thus, there are several metabolites for the diagnosis of
meningiomas, although it remains unclear which metabolite should be prioritized for
the diagnosis of this tumors.We performed a retrospective study to evaluate differences between meningiomas and
other intracranial enhanced mass lesions in metabolic peaks using MRS in short TE
spectra and to assess the most useful metabolite peak for discrimination between the
groups.
Material and Methods
Patients
In this retrospective study, from January 2014 and January 2021, 60 patients
having intracranial mass lesions showing gadolinium enhancement on T1-weighted
images and evaluated on MR spectroscopy in short echo time (TE) spectra were
identified. A total of histologically confirmed 31 patients were analyzed in
this study; the remaining 29 patients were excluded due to no histological
confirmation (24 patients) or inadequate MRS examinations (5 patients). Nine of
the 31 patients were diagnosed with meningiomas. Twenty-two of the 31 patients
were diagnosed with other tumors (non-meningiomas). The non-meningiomas included
brain abscess (n = 4), primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) (n = 2),
adenocarcinoma (n = 5), glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) (n = 5), anaplastic
astrocytoma (n = 1), anaplastic oligodendroglioma (n = 1), anaplastic ependymoma
(n = 1), hemangiopericytoma (n = 2), and schwannoma (n = 1). Also, normal
controls of the contralateral brain showing normal brain were evaluated in 15 of
31 patients. The demographics and histology of meningiomas, non-meningiomas, and
normal controls are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Demographics and histology of meningiomas, non-meningiomas, and normal
controls.
Meningiomas
Non-meningiomas
Normal controls
Number
9
22
15
Age (years), mean ± SD
56 ± 17
62 ± 16
64 ± 16
Female/male
6/3
8/14
6/9
Histology
Grade I (7)Glade II (2)
Brain abscess (4), PCNSL (2), AC (5), GBM (5), AA (1), AO
(1), AE (1), hemangioblastoma (2), Schwannoma (1)
PCNSL: primary central nervous system lymphoma; AC: adenocarcinoma;
GBM: glioblastoma multiforme; AA: anaplastic astrocytoma; AO:
anaplastic oligodendroglioma; AE: anaplastic ependymoma.
Demographics and histology of meningiomas, non-meningiomas, and normal
controls.PCNSL: primary central nervous system lymphoma; AC: adenocarcinoma;
GBM: glioblastoma multiforme; AA: anaplastic astrocytoma; AO:
anaplastic oligodendroglioma; AE: anaplastic ependymoma.Our hospital’s institutional review board approved this study, and the
requirement for written informed consent was waived by the review board due to
the retrospective nature of the study.
Image acquisition
MR imaging in all 31 patients and 15 normal controls was performed using the
3-Tesla MR system (Philips Ingenia, Best, The Netherlands) with an eight-channel
phased-array head coil, following the standard protocol for adult brain imaging
at our hospital: pre- and post-contrast gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted
fast-spoiled gradient echo sequence, TR/TE, 7.0/2.4 ms; slice thickness, 0.7 mm;
FOV, 240 × 240 mm; matrix, 360 × 354; T2-weighted fast spin-echo sequence,
TR/TE, 4000/85 ms; section thickness, 5 mm; FOV, 240 × 220 mm; matrix,
380 × 270; FLAIR image, TR/TE/IR, 10,000/120/2200; section thickness, 5 mm; FOV
240 × 180 mm; matrix, 320 × 170; and axial spin-echo single-shot echo-planar
sequence (DWI), TR/TE, 4400/68 ms; slice thickness, 5 mm; FOV, 240 × 212 mm;
matrix, 170 × 128. DWI was performed using b values of 0 and 1000
s/mm2. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were calculated
from the DWI.Proton MR spectra were acquired after contrast administration in all cases.
Single-voxel MRS (TR/TE = 2000/36; 128 averages) was performed. Automated
shimming and water suppression methods were used. Signal contamination from fat
tissue in the skull and skull base was prevented by using spatially localized
saturation bands to suppress the signal from the scalp or orbital fat on MRS.
The acquisition time for spectroscopic imaging studies varied between 7 and 10
min. For all MRS acquisitions, the volume of interest (VOI) was manually placed
to mainly include the enhancing portions of the lesions on contrast-enhanced
axial T1-weighted images. The volume of the VOI was adapted to the size and
extent of the lesion, resulting in voxel sizes ranging from 1.1 × 1.1 × 1.1 to
2.1 × 2.1 × 2.1 cm3. None of the cases received mannitol at the time
of MRS.
Image analysis
Review of MRS studies was performed by a single experienced neuroradiologist
(E.M.). Pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted, T2-weighted, FLAIR and
diffusion-weighted images, clinical and histopathological findings were
accessible during analysis of MRS data. The following peaks were measured: peak
at 3.8 ppm; Cho at 3.21 ppm; Cr at 3.02 ppm; NACs at 2.02 ppm; Ala at 1.48 ppm;
bgGlx at 2.1–2.5 ppm; Lip at 1.3 ppm; lactate (Lac) at 1.33 ppm. In this study,
Lip and Lac were recorded as Lip and/or Lac (Lip-Lac) because lipids usually
overlap with lactate. The peak heights of the metabolites were used in
determining the ratios. The relative quantity of each metabolite was measured as
the ratio of its peak height to the peak height of creatine. For the metabolite
peak at 3.8 ppm, the ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm among all the peaks was also
determined.
Statistical analysis
The Mann-Whitney U test was used to analyze the differences between meningiomas
and non-meningiomas, as well as meningiomas and normal controls, for the seven
metabolic parameters: the ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm, peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr,
Cho/Cr, NACs/Cr, bgGlx/Cr, Lip-Lac/Cr, and presence of Ala. Finally, we selected
the statistically useful metabolic parameters for further analysis.For the differentiation of meningiomas from non-meningiomas, the cutoff values
that provided the best combination of sensitivity and specificity for each
adapted metabolic parameter were selected using receiver operating
characteristic (ROC) analysis. The cutoff values were determined using the
Youden index. We determined the accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive
predictive value, and negative predictive value of each parameter using
chi-squared analysis. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of each parameter was
also evaluated. P < 0.01 was considered indicative of a statistical
significance.All the statistical analyses were performed with EZR (Saitama Medical Center,
Jichi Medical University, Saitama, Japan), which is a graphical user interface
for R (The R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Results
Nine cases of meningioma were characterized by prominent Cho and peak at 3.8 ppm. Cr
was reduced in eight cases and distinct in one case. All the cases revealed distinct
NACs at 2.02 ppm and bgGlx at 2.1–2.5 ppm. Lip-Lac was distinct in eight cases with
meningiomas, whereas it was the prominent peak in one case with atypical meningioma.
Ala was present in six of nine cases of meningioma. A summary of the MRS findings
for the meningiomas is shown in Table 2. Representative MR images of
meningiomas with corresponding spectra are shown in Figs. 1 and 2.
A representative MR image of meningioma with its corresponding spectrum in
case 1. (a) A coronal Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of meningioma at left
temporal base. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent Cho and
peak at 3.8 ppm (arrowed) are seen. The ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm is
the second. The peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr ratio, 2.77, Cho/Cr ratio, 3.8, NACs/Cr
ratio, 1.92, bgGlx/Cr ratio, 1.38, and Lip-Lac/Cr ratio, 1.64. Ala showing
doublet is also seen at 1.48 ppm.
Fig. 2.
A representative MR image of meningiomas with its corresponding spectrum in
case 3. (a) An axial Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of meningioma at right
temporo-occipital convexity. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a).
Prominent Cho, Lip-Lac at 1.3 ppm and the peak at 3.8 ppm (arrowed) are
seen. The ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm is the third. The peak at 3.8
ppm/Cr ratio, 3.02, Cho/Cr ratio, 7.41, NACs/Cr ratio, 3.61, bgGlx/Cr ratio,
2.57, and Lip-Lac/Cr ratio, 6.11. Small Ala showing doublet is also seen at
1.48 ppm.
Summary of MRS findings for the meningiomas.3.8 ppm: peak at 3.8 ppm; Cr: creatine; Cho: choline; NACs: N-acetyl
compounds; bgGlx: β-γ Glutamine-Glutamate; Lip–Lac: lipid and/or
lactate.A representative MR image of meningioma with its corresponding spectrum in
case 1. (a) A coronal Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of meningioma at left
temporal base. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent Cho and
peak at 3.8 ppm (arrowed) are seen. The ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm is
the second. The peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr ratio, 2.77, Cho/Cr ratio, 3.8, NACs/Cr
ratio, 1.92, bgGlx/Cr ratio, 1.38, and Lip-Lac/Cr ratio, 1.64. Ala showing
doublet is also seen at 1.48 ppm.A representative MR image of meningiomas with its corresponding spectrum in
case 3. (a) An axial Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of meningioma at right
temporo-occipital convexity. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a).
Prominent Cho, Lip-Lac at 1.3 ppm and the peak at 3.8 ppm (arrowed) are
seen. The ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm is the third. The peak at 3.8
ppm/Cr ratio, 3.02, Cho/Cr ratio, 7.41, NACs/Cr ratio, 3.61, bgGlx/Cr ratio,
2.57, and Lip-Lac/Cr ratio, 6.11. Small Ala showing doublet is also seen at
1.48 ppm.Among 22 cases with non-meningiomas, the peak at 3.8 ppm was visible in 15 of 22
cases and undetectable in the remaining 7 cases, including one PCNSL, one abscess,
two adenocarcinomas, two GBMs, and one anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Cr was not
visible in four cases, including one abscess, one adenocarcinoma, one
hemangioblastoma, and one Schwannoma. Cho was undetectable in two cases, including
one abscess and one hemangioblastoma. bgGlx was invisible in five cases, including
two abscesses, one adenocarcinoma, one hemangioblastoma, and one schwannoma. NACs at
2.02 ppm were not visible in two cases, including one abscess and one
adenocarcinoma. Lip-Lac levels were increased in all 22 cases. MR images of
non-meningiomas with the corresponding spectra are shown in Figs. 3
to 5.
Fig. 3.
An MR image of PCNSL with its corresponding spectrum mimicking meningiomas.
(a) An axial Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of PCNSL at right cerebellar
hemisphere. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent Cho, NACs
and peak at 3.8 ppm are seen. Ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm is the third
ranking. The peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr ratio, 1.52, Cho/Cr ratio, 2.54, NACs/Cr
ratio, 1.77, bgGlx/Cr ratio, 1.15, and Lip-Lac/Cr ratio, 1.36. No Ala is
seen.
Fig. 4.
A representative MR image of GBM with its corresponding spectrum. (a) A
coronal Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of GBM at left temporal lobe. (b) The
spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent Cho and Lip-Lac are seen. The
ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm is the fourth. The peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr ratio,
1.14, Cho/Cr ratio, 2.78, NACs/Cr ratio, 0.84, bgGlx/Cr ratio, 0.52 and
Lip-Lac/Cr ratio, 1.94. No Ala is seen.
Fig. 5.
A representative MR image of brain abscess with its corresponding spectrum.
(a) An axial Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of brain abscess at left frontal
lobe. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent Lip–Lac and
small Ala showing doublet is seen. A small peak at 3.8 ppm (arrowed) ranks
fourth.
An MR image of PCNSL with its corresponding spectrum mimicking meningiomas.
(a) An axial Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of PCNSL at right cerebellar
hemisphere. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent Cho, NACs
and peak at 3.8 ppm are seen. Ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm is the third
ranking. The peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr ratio, 1.52, Cho/Cr ratio, 2.54, NACs/Cr
ratio, 1.77, bgGlx/Cr ratio, 1.15, and Lip-Lac/Cr ratio, 1.36. No Ala is
seen.A representative MR image of GBM with its corresponding spectrum. (a) A
coronal Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of GBM at left temporal lobe. (b) The
spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent Cho and Lip-Lac are seen. The
ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm is the fourth. The peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr ratio,
1.14, Cho/Cr ratio, 2.78, NACs/Cr ratio, 0.84, bgGlx/Cr ratio, 0.52 and
Lip-Lac/Cr ratio, 1.94. No Ala is seen.A representative MR image of brain abscess with its corresponding spectrum.
(a) An axial Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of brain abscess at left frontal
lobe. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent Lip–Lac and
small Ala showing doublet is seen. A small peak at 3.8 ppm (arrowed) ranks
fourth.In the 15 normal controls, the spectra revealed peaks of NACs, bgGlx, Cr, and Cho and
a peak at 3.8 ppm. Only two controls showed a small Lac-Lip. No Ala was visible in
any of the normal controls. A representative MR image of the normal control with its
corresponding spectrum is shown in Fig. 6.
Fig. 6.
A representative MR image of the normal control with its corresponding
spectrum. (a) An axial Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of brain abscess at
left frontal lobe, same as Fig. 5(a). VOI is placed at the normal contralateral (right)
fronto-parietal lobe. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent
NACs, Cr, and Cho are seen. The ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm (arrowed) is
the fifth. The peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr ratio, 0.43, Cho/Cr ratio, 0.83, NAA/Cr
ratio, 1.36, bgGlx/Cr ratio, 0.28, and Lip–Lac/Cr ratio, 2.07. No Lip–Lac
and Ala are seen.
A representative MR image of the normal control with its corresponding
spectrum. (a) An axial Gd-enhanced T1-weighted image of brain abscess at
left frontal lobe, same as Fig. 5(a). VOI is placed at the normal contralateral (right)
fronto-parietal lobe. (b) The spectrum from the VOI shown in (a). Prominent
NACs, Cr, and Cho are seen. The ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm (arrowed) is
the fifth. The peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr ratio, 0.43, Cho/Cr ratio, 0.83, NAA/Cr
ratio, 1.36, bgGlx/Cr ratio, 0.28, and Lip–Lac/Cr ratio, 2.07. No Lip–Lac
and Ala are seen.The seven metabolic parameters, including the ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm, peak at
3.8 ppm/Cr, Cho/Cr, NACs/Cr, bgGlx/Cr, Lip-Lac/Cr, and the presence of Ala in
meningiomas, non-meningiomas, and normal controls, are shown in Table 3. Scatterplots of
the six metabolic parameters, except the presence of Ala, are also shown in Fig. 7.
Table 3.
The metabolic parameters in meningiomas, non-meningiomas, and normal
controls.
The metabolic parameters in meningiomas, non-meningiomas, and normal
controls.3.8: peak at 3.8 ppm; Cr: creatine; Cho: choline; NACs: N-acetyl
compounds; bgGlx: β-γ Glutamine-Glutamate; Lip–Lac: lipid and/or
lactate; Ala: alanine.Meningiomas vs. 21 non-meningiomas.Meningioma vs. 15 normal controls.Scatterplots of the ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm, the peak at 3.8ppm/Cr,
Cho/Cr, NACs/Cr, bgGlx/Cr and Lip-Lac/Cr.Note: 3.8 ppm indicates the peak at 3.8 ppm.Cr: creatine; Cho: choline; NACs: N-acetyl compounds; bgGlx: β-γ
Glutamine-Glutamate; Lip–Lac: lipid and/or lactate; Men: meningioma;
non-Men: non-meningioma; CO: cutoff value; ACC: accuracy, AI: asymmetry
index; SBR: specific binding ratio.Regarding the peak at 3.8 ppm, the ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm was the second or
third for the meningiomas, the third to seventh for the non-meningiomas, and the
fifth to seventh for the normal controls. For the meningiomas, seven cases ranked
second (Fig. 1) and two
cases ranked third (Fig.
2). For the non-meningiomas, six cases ranked less than the fifth; one case
of PCNSL ranked the third (Fig.
3), and two cases of GBM (Fig. 4), one case of anaplastic ependymoma,
and two cases of brain abscess (Fig. 5) ranked the fourth. Significant differences were observed between
meningiomas and non-meningiomas (P < 0.001), as well as meningiomas and normal
controls (P < 0.001).Regarding the other metabolic parameters, significant differences were observed
between meningiomas and non-meningiomas for the peak at 3.8 ppm/Cr (P < 0.001),
bgGlx/Cr (P < 0.01), Lip-Lac/Cr (P < 0.01), and the presence of Ala
(P < 0.001). No significant difference was observed between meningiomas and
non-meningiomas for NACs/Cr (P = 0.04) and Cho/Cr (P = 0.08). We adapted
statistically useful metabolic parameters, except NACs/Cr and Cho/Cr.The results of the diagnostic tests for the adapted five metabolic parameters for
differentiating meningiomas from non-meningiomas are summarized in Table 4. The highest
accuracy was 96.9% at a cutoff value of 3 for the ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm.
The second highest accuracy was 92.3% at a cutoff value of 1.44 for the peak at
3.8 ppm/Cr. The third highest accuracy was 80.6% at a cutoff value of 2.07 for
Lip-Lac/Cr. The fourth highest accuracy was 80.1% at a cutoff value of 1.29 for
bgGlx/Cr. The lowest accuracy was 78.8% for the presence of Ala.
Table 4.
The diagnostic tests for the adapted five metabolic parameters for
differentiating meningiomas from non-meningiomas.
AUC
ACC
SEN
SPE
PPV
NPV
P value
The Ranking of 3.8 ppm≤3
0.99
96.9%
100%
93.8%
94.2%
100%
<0.001
3.8 ppm/Cr≥1.44
0.96
92.3%
100%
84.6%
86.7%
100%
<0.001
Lip-Lac/Cr≤2.07
0.82
80.6%
88.9%
72.2%
76.2%
86.7%
<0.001
bgGlx/Cr≥1.29
0.82
80.1%
77.8%
82.4%
80.5%
78.5%
<0.001
Ala
0.79
78.8%
66.7%
90.9%
88%
73.2%
<0.001
3.8 ppm: peak at 3.8 ppm; AUC: area under the curve; ACC: accuracy; SEN:
sensitivity; SPE: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV:
negative predictive value; Cr: creatine; Lip–Lac: lipid and/or lactate;
bgGlx: β-γ Glutamine-Glutamate; Ala: alanine.
The diagnostic tests for the adapted five metabolic parameters for
differentiating meningiomas from non-meningiomas.3.8 ppm: peak at 3.8 ppm; AUC: area under the curve; ACC: accuracy; SEN:
sensitivity; SPE: specificity; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV:
negative predictive value; Cr: creatine; Lip–Lac: lipid and/or lactate;
bgGlx: β-γ Glutamine-Glutamate; Ala: alanine.
Discussion
The present study evaluated the metabolic features of meningiomas that would
distinguish them from other intracranial enhanced mass lesions using MRS in short TE
spectra. The analysis showed a good test accuracy for differentiating meningiomas
from non-meningiomas using statistically useful metabolic parameters. The highest
accuracy was 96.9% at a threshold value of 3 for the ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm.
Therefore, a distinct elevated peak at 3.8 ppm, ranked among the top three highest
peaks, allowed the detection of meningiomas.An elevated peak at 3.8 ppm was observed in meningiomas, non-meningiomas, and normal
controls. We used the “ranking” as a simple objective indicator of peak height at
3.8 ppm. The ranking of the peak at 3.8 ppm was the second or third for meningiomas,
the third to seventh for non-meningiomas, and the fifth to seventh for normal
controls. There are several metabolites at 3.8 ppm, including leucine, alanine,
α-Glx, glutathione, lysine, arginine, serine, guanidinoacetate, phosphoethanolamine,
oligosaccharide, trehalose, glucose, and mannitol.[23,25] In meningiomas, it was
evident that all cases revealed a distinct signal at 3.8 ppm, showing the second or
third ranking peak. This finding was characteristic, and it differentiated them from
other cerebral lesions, obviously due to the underlying metabolic differences. As
metabolites at a peak at 3.8 ppm for meningiomas, α-CH amino acids, including α-Glx
and glutathione, phosphoethanolamine, oligosaccharide, or guanidinoacetate, have
been postulated,[12,13,16,17,20,23,26] although the chemical substance observed at 3.8 ppm is still
undetermined. As for non-meningiomas, a distinct peak at 3.8 ppm has been found in
medulloblastomas, germinomas,
tuberculomas,
and fungal abscesses,[28,29] although the metabolite
remained unclear in those lesions. In the present study, an important observation is
that one case of PCNSL revealed a distinct signal at 3.8 ppm, showing the third
ranking peak. To the best of our knowledge, a distinct signal at 3.8 ppm in PCNSL
has not been previously reported. As for the normal controls, the metabolite for the
peak at 3.8 ppm may have been α-Glx, which is usually seen as a doublet or triplet
at 3.65 to 3.8 ppm.The evaluation of tumors by MRS usually involves the analysis of Lac and Lip. Lac is
the product of anaerobic glycolysis, and Lip is correlated with the extent of
microscopic cellular necrosis.[31,32] Lip is observed to be minimal
in typical meningiomas[11,13,17,22,33] but marked in Schwannomas, metastatic tumors, brain abscesses,
and glioblastomas.[13,34] The present study showed that Lip–Lac/Cr was significantly
lower in meningiomas than in non-meningiomas, confirming the findings of the
previous studies. Only one case of an atypical meningioma showed prominent Lip–Lac.
This finding seemed to indicate microscopic necrosis in atypical
meningioma.[33,35] Yue et al. reported that Lip represents not only micronecrosis
in non-benign meningiomas but also microcystic changes or fatty degeneration in
benign meningiomas.The bgGlxs are spread over the range of 2.1–2.5 ppm and merge with NACs at 2.02 ppm.
Several studies have revealed a higher occurrence of Glx in meningiomas than in
other intracranial tumors.[13,21,22,36] Regarding the assumed metabolic pathways of Glx in meningiomas,
Glu is utilized through the transamination and the oxidation of pyruvate. The
deamination of Gln to Glu, via glutaminase, could provide Glu for Ala production.
In this study, all cases of meningiomas revealed distinct bgGlx. In addition,
a significant difference related to bgGlx/Cr was observed between meningiomas and
non-meningiomas. Hazany et al. indicated that the peak heights of bgGlxs over the
range of 2.1–2.5 ppm may facilitate the underestimation of their quantity in the brain.
Quantitative 1H-MRS studies would be a better measure, as it revealed an
increased Glx concentration in meningiomas compared with other intracranial
tumors.[16,21,22]Ala has been suggested by various studies to underlie meningioma, but it is found in
abscesses[37,38] and rarely in other intracranial tumors.[12,19,21,39-42] Ala is thought to be an
alternative reduced partner of pyruvate derived from glycolysis.
Ala is affected by the J-coupling effect and splits as doublets. In this
study, the Ala doublet was present in six of nine meningiomas and two of four
abscesses. For meningiomas, the frequency of the presence of Ala varies with
studies, ranging from 32 to 100%.
Voxel size has been suggested as a factor underlying the variance of Ala.
In the present study, all Ala-positive cases had a sufficient voxel size,
confirming the report by the study of Yue et al.
Hence, Ala is a unique marker of intracranial meningiomas, although its
concentration may be underestimated when compared with the observed elevated peak at
3.8 ppm in meningiomas.Regarding NACs, all cases of meningioma revealed a distinct peak at 2.02 ppm,
although no significant difference related to NACs/Cr was observed between
meningiomas and non-meningiomas. The important observation is the presence of a
distinct peak at 2.02 ppm for meningiomas. NAA is a marker metabolite for neurons,
and it can be assumed that the spectra obtained from voxels placed entirely within
the meningiomas contained no NAA. Therefore, it should be considered that a peak
around 2.02 ppm for meningiomas represents other endogenous NACs, such as
N-acetylaspartylglutamate, N-acetylneuraminic acid and N-acetylgalactosamine
or short TE metabolites such as bgGlx.Our study has several limitations. First, this study was carried out in a single
hospital; thus, the study population was small. In addition, only nine meningiomas
were reviewed, and this was a retrospective study. Second, only short TE spectra
were obtained in this study. It is preferable to obtain both short and long TE
spectra for the analysis of intracranial lesions. Third, this study was qualitative,
and it used ratios of peak heights to measure the levels of brain metabolites.
Quantitative inspection and the use of advanced models for the evaluation of ratios
are desirable. Because of these limitations, further validation with a greater
number of cases is needed. Allowing for these limitations, we believe our findings
provide helpful insights related to the diagnostic workup for meningiomas.
Furthermore, this simple evaluation, involving ranking the peak at 3.8 ppm, is
expected to be a useful indicator for differentiating meningiomas from intracranial
mass lesions in clinical settings.In conclusion, prominent peak at 3.8 ppm, minimal Lip/Lac, distinct bgGlx and the
presence of Ala are metabolic features that can be used to distinguish meningiomas
from non-meningiomas. A distinct elevated peak at 3.8 ppm, ranked among the top
three highest peaks, facilitated the detection of meningiomas.
Authors: Elizabeth B Claus; Melissa L Bondy; Joellen M Schildkraut; Joseph L Wiemels; Margaret Wrensch; Peter M Black Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: P H Lai; H H Weng; C Y Chen; S S Hsu; S Ding; C W Ko; J H Fu; H L Liang; K H Chen Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2008-05-22 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Timoleon Siempis; Charalampos Tsakiris; George A Alexiou; Vassileios G Xydis; Spyridon Voulgaris; Maria I Argyropoulou Journal: Clin Neurol Neurosurg Date: 2019-12-16 Impact factor: 1.876