BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is difficult to differentiate the cause of brain abscesses with the use of CT and MR imaging. We did a comparative evaluation of pyogenic, tubercular, and fungal brain abscesses by using conventional, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and proton MR spectroscopy (PMRS) with an aim to define the unique features that may differentiate among the pyogenic, tubercular, and fungal brain abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on 110 patients with surgically proved brain abscesses. Imaging studies included T2, T1, postcontrast T1, DWI, and PMRS. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the wall and cavity of the abscesses were quantified. The morphologic, physiologic, and metabolite features of pyogenic (n=91), tubercular (n=11), and fungal (n=8) abscesses were compared. RESULTS: The pyogenic abscesses had smooth (55/91) and lobulated (36/91) walls, whereas the tubercular abscesses had smooth (4/11), lobulated (6/11), or crenated walls (1/11) with no intracavitary projections. The fungal abscesses showed irregular walls (lobulated 4/8, crenated 4/8) with intracavitary projections (8/8). The wall as well as the cavity showed low ADC in the pyogenic and tubercular abscesses. In the fungal abscesses, the wall and projections showed low ADC (8/8); however, the cavity itself showed high ADC (8/8). PMRS showed cytosolic amino acids (89/91), acetate (25/91), and succinate (18/91) in the pyogenic abscesses, whereas lipid/lactate (11/11) was seen in the tubercular abscesses. The fungal abscesses showed lipid (4/8), lactate (7/8), amino acids (4/8), and multiple peaks between 3.6 and 3.8 ppm assigned to trehalose (5/8). CONCLUSION: Based on the morphologic, ADC, and metabolite information, it may be possible to differentiate among the pyogenic, tubercular, and fungal brain abscesses.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: It is difficult to differentiate the cause of brain abscesses with the use of CT and MR imaging. We did a comparative evaluation of pyogenic, tubercular, and fungal brain abscesses by using conventional, diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), and proton MR spectroscopy (PMRS) with an aim to define the unique features that may differentiate among the pyogenic, tubercular, and fungal brain abscesses. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis on 110 patients with surgically proved brain abscesses. Imaging studies included T2, T1, postcontrast T1, DWI, and PMRS. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) of the wall and cavity of the abscesses were quantified. The morphologic, physiologic, and metabolite features of pyogenic (n=91), tubercular (n=11), and fungal (n=8) abscesses were compared. RESULTS: The pyogenic abscesses had smooth (55/91) and lobulated (36/91) walls, whereas the tubercular abscesses had smooth (4/11), lobulated (6/11), or crenated walls (1/11) with no intracavitary projections. The fungal abscesses showed irregular walls (lobulated 4/8, crenated 4/8) with intracavitary projections (8/8). The wall as well as the cavity showed low ADC in the pyogenic and tubercular abscesses. In the fungal abscesses, the wall and projections showed low ADC (8/8); however, the cavity itself showed high ADC (8/8). PMRS showed cytosolic amino acids (89/91), acetate (25/91), and succinate (18/91) in the pyogenic abscesses, whereas lipid/lactate (11/11) was seen in the tubercular abscesses. The fungal abscesses showed lipid (4/8), lactate (7/8), amino acids (4/8), and multiple peaks between 3.6 and 3.8 ppm assigned to trehalose (5/8). CONCLUSION: Based on the morphologic, ADC, and metabolite information, it may be possible to differentiate among the pyogenic, tubercular, and fungal brain abscesses.
Authors: J A Siegal; E D Cacayorinb; A S Nassif; D Rizk; C Galambos; B Levy; D Kennedy; J Visconti; W Perman Journal: Magn Reson Imaging Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 2.546
Authors: Asht M Mishra; Rakesh K Gupta; Sona Saksena; Kashi N Prasad; Chandra M Pandey; Divya Rathore; Ankur Purwar; Ram K S Rathore; Nuzhat Husain; Deepak K Jha; Ramandeep S Jaggi; Mazhar Husain Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Uwe Himmelreich; Richard Accurso; Richard Malik; Brion Dolenko; Rajmund L Somorjai; Rakesh K Gupta; Lavier Gomes; Carolyn E Mountford; Tania C Sorrell Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-06-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Paola Gaviani; Richard B Schwartz; E Tessa Hedley-Whyte; Keith L Ligon; Ari Robicsek; Pamela Schaefer; John W Henson Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2005-05 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: S Mong; B M Ellingson; P L Nghiemphu; H J Kim; L Mirsadraei; A Lai; W Yong; T M Zaw; T F Cloughesy; W B Pope Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2012-04-26 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Matteo Paoletti; Shaun Ivan Muzic; Francesca Marchetti; Lisa Maria Farina; Stefano Bastianello; Anna Pichiecchio Journal: Radiol Med Date: 2021-01-24 Impact factor: 3.469