Literature DB >> 34210335

Cementing technique for total knee arthroplasty in cadavers using a pastry bone cement.

Hans Bösebeck1, Anna-Maria Holl2, Peter Ochsner3, Manuel Groth2, Kevin Stippich2, Andrej M Nowakowski4, Christian Egloff5, Sebastian Hoechel6, Beat Göpfert7, Sebastian Vogt2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In cemented primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), aseptic loosening remains a major cause for failure. Cementing techniques and characteristics of a chosen cement play a key role for good fixation and implant survival. A pastry bone cement was developed to facilitate the cement preparation and to rule out most of preparation-associated application errors. The pastry bone cement was compared to a conventional polymethyl methacrylate cement in a TKA setting.
METHODS: Standardized implantations of total knee endoprostheses were performed in bilateral knee cadavers to investigate handling properties, variables of cement application, working time, and temperature development. Mechanical aspects and cementation quality were assessed by pull-out trials and microscopic interface analysis.
RESULTS: Both cements expressed similar characteristics during preparation and application, only the curing time of the pastry cement was about 3 min longer and the temperature peak was lower. Fractures of the conventional cement specimens differed from the pastry cement specimens in the tibial part, while no differences were found in the femoral part. Penetration depth of the pastry cement was similar (tibia) or deeper (femur) compared to the conventional cement.
CONCLUSIONS: The pastry cement facilitates the feasibility of cemented TKA. The pre-clinical tests indicate that the pastry bone cement fulfills the requirements for bone cement in the field of knee arthroplasty. A clinical trial is needed to further investigate the approach and ensure patient safety.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone cement; Cemented TKA; PMMA; Pastry cement; Total knee arthroplasty

Year:  2021        PMID: 34210335     DOI: 10.1186/s13018-021-02436-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res        ISSN: 1749-799X            Impact factor:   2.359


  21 in total

1.  Cemented tibial component fixation performs better than cementless fixation: a randomized radiostereometric study comparing porous-coated, hydroxyapatite-coated and cemented tibial components over 5 years.

Authors:  Ake Carlsson; Anders Björkman; Jack Besjakov; Ingemar Onsten
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.717

2.  Comparison of cementless and hybrid cemented total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard Lass; Bernd Kubista; Johannes Holinka; Martin Pfeiffer; Spiro Schuller; Sandra Stenicka; Reinhard Windhager; Alexander Giurea
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.390

Review 3.  Long-term implant survivorship of cementless total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Mont; Robert Pivec; Kimona Issa; Bhaveen H Kapadia; Aditya Maheshwari; Steven F Harwin
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 2.757

Review 4.  Cemented, cementless or hybrid fixation options in total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis and other non-traumatic diseases.

Authors:  Gilberto Yoshinobu Nakama; Maria Stella Peccin; Gustavo J M Almeida; Ozório de Almeida Lira Neto; Antônio A B Queiroz; Ricardo Dizioli Navarro
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

5.  Cemented versus uncemented fixation of the femoral component of the NexGen CR total knee replacement in patients younger than 60 years: a prospective randomised controlled RSA study.

Authors:  Feng Gao; Anders Henricson; Kjell G Nilsson
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Hydroxyapatite-coated tibial implants compared with cemented tibial fixation in primary total knee arthroplasty. A randomized trial of outcomes at five years.

Authors:  L A Beaupré; M al-Yamani; J R Huckell; D W C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 7.  Hydroxyapatite (HA) coating appears to be of benefit for implant durability of tibial components in primary total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jeffrey D Voigt; Michael Mosier
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2011-06-10       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 8.  RSA prediction of high failure rate for the uncoated Interax TKA confirmed by meta-analysis.

Authors:  Bart G Pijls; Marc J Nieuwenhuijse; Jan W Schoones; Saskia Middeldorp; Edward R Valstar; Rob G H H Nelissen
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 3.717

9.  Cemented or cementless total knee arthroplasty? - Comparative results of 200 cases at a minimum follow-up of 11 years.

Authors:  Jean-Louis Prudhon; Régis Verdier
Journal:  SICOT J       Date:  2017-12-12

10.  The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States.

Authors:  Kevin J Bozic; Steven M Kurtz; Edmund Lau; Kevin Ong; Vanessa Chiu; Thomas P Vail; Harry E Rubash; Daniel J Berry
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.