| Literature DB >> 34209878 |
Shih-Chiang Hung1,2, Chen-Cheng Yang3, Chu-Feng Liu2, Chia-Te Kung2, Wen-Huei Lee2, Chi-Kung Ho1,4, Hung-Yi Chuang4,5, Hsin-Su Yu6.
Abstract
Ambient temperature change is one of the risk factors of human health. Moreover, links between white blood cell counts (WBC) and diseases have been revealed in the literature. Still, we do not know of any association between ambient temperature change and WBC counts. The aim of our study is to investigate the relationship between ambient temperature change and WBC counts. We conducted this two-year population-based observational study in Kaohsiung city, recruiting voluntary community participants. Total WBC and differential counts, demographic data and health hazard habits were collected and matched with the meteorological data of air-quality monitoring stations with participants' study dates and addresses. Generalized additive models (GAM) with penalized smoothing spline functions were performed for the trend of temperature changes and WBC counts. There were 9278 participants (45.3% male, aged 54.3 ± 5.9 years-old) included in analysis. Compared with stable weather conditions, the WBC counts were statistically higher when the one-day lag temperature changed over 2 degrees Celsius, regardless of whether colder or hotter. We found a V-shaped pattern association between WBC counts and temperature changes in GAM. The ambient temperature change was associated with WBC counts, and might imply an impact on systematic inflammation response.Entities:
Keywords: ambient temperature; generalized additive model; white blood cell count
Year: 2021 PMID: 34209878 PMCID: PMC8296857 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18136971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Brief of including records of participants. * exclusion criteria: pregnancy, current malignancy diseases, history of auto-immune diseases, status of infectious disease or fever.
Demographic characteristics of participants.
| Variables | Total | ΔT 1 > 2 °C | 0°C ≤ ΔT ≤ 2 °C | −2 °C ≤ ΔT < 0 °C | ΔT < −2 °C | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 331 | 32 | 134 | 147 | 18 | ||
|
| 9278 | 891 | 3908 | 4168 | 311 | ||
|
| 54.3 ± 5.9 | 53.8 ± 5.7 | 54.2 ± 5.7 | 54.4 ± 5.9 | 55.0 ± 6.1 | ||
|
| 4200 (45.3%) | 340 (38.2%) | 1661 (42.5%) | 1836 (44.1%) | 142 (45.7%) | ||
|
| 24.7 ± 3.8 | 25.0 ± 3.8 | 24.6 ± 3.4 | 24.8 ± 4.1 | 25.2 ± 3.6 | ||
|
| College/Graduate | 1259 (13.0%) | 108 (12.2%) | 506 (13.0%) | 528 (12.8%) | 30 (9.8%) | |
| High school | 3874 (40.0%) | 371 (42.0%) | 1587 (40.8%) | 1626 (39.4%) | 108 (35.2%) | ||
| Elementary school | 3328 (34.3%) | 293 (33.1%) | 1326 (34.1%) | 1433 (34.7%) | 119 (38.8%) | ||
| Illiterate | 1228 (12.7%) | 112 (12.7%) | 468 (12.0%) | 540 (13.1%) | 50 (16.3%) | ||
|
| current | 1457 (15.7%) | 113 (13.0%) | 558 (14.5%) | 652 (15.9%) | 60 (19.5%) | |
| former | 501 (5.2%) | 46 (5.3%) | 189 (4.9%) | 222 (5.4%) | 17 (5.5%) | ||
| never | 7628 (79.6%) | 708 (81.7%) | 3106 (80.6%) | 3324 (78.7%) | 231 (75%) | ||
|
| 1383 (14.3%) | 89 (10.1%) | 591 (15.3%) | 603 (14.6%) | 44 (14.3%) | ||
|
| 273 (2.8%) | 24 (2.7%) | 102 (2.6%) | 126 (3.1%) | 8 (2.6%) | ||
1 ΔT, difference of one-day lag apparent temperature.
Counts and percentage of WBCs by different value of ΔT.
| Variables | Total | ΔT 1 > 2 °C | 0 °C ≤ ΔT ≤ 2 °C | −2 °C ≤ ΔT < 0 °C | ΔT < −2 °C | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 331 | 32 | 134 | 147 | 18 | |
|
| 9278 | 891 | 3908 | 4168 | 311 | |
|
| ||||||
| Total WBC | 5910.7 ± 1477.3 | 6110.1 ± 1460.3 | 5876.4 ± 1459.8 | 5889.9 ± 1478.2 | 6064.8 ± 1593.1 | <0.0001 |
| Neutrocyte | 3232.2 ± 1129.3 | 3389.6 ± 1143.8 | 3201.8 ± 1107.6 | 3221.3 ± 1137.0 | 3314.4 ± 1221.9 | <0.001 |
| Monocyte | 360.4 ± 128.4 | 371.8 ± 128.6 | 357.3 ± 126.3 | 358.0 ± 124.0 | 389.9 ± 172.9 | <0.001 |
| Eosinophil | 142.1 ± 130.7 | 157.4 ± 166.4 | 153.5 ± 166.4 | 149.4 ± 129.1 | 163.3 ± 119.5 | 0.116 |
| Basophil | 30.9 ± 20.2 | 30.8 ± 20.8 | 31.8 ± 21.1 | 30.7 ± 21.0 | 33.75 ± 29.2 | 0.05 |
| Lymphocyte | 2130.0 ± 617.4 | 2161.8 ± 583.1 | 2130.0 ± 618.3 | 2120.6 ± 623.5 | 2163.9 ± 619.3 | 0.234 |
|
| ||||||
| neutrocyte (%) | 53.99 ± 9.02 | 54.78 ± 8.76 | 53.81 ± 8.96 | 54.00 ± 9.25 | 53.87 ± 8.45 | 0.041 |
| monocyte (%) | 6.15 ± 1.77 | 6.13 ± 1.69 | 6.15 ± 1.87 | 6.14 ± 1.64 | 6.45 ± 2.37 | 0.029 |
| eosinophil (%) | 2.57 ± 1.92 | 2.55 ± 2.18 | 2.62 ± 1.92 | 2.53 ± 1.89 | 2.72 ± 1.83 | 0.118 |
| basophil (%) | 0.54 ± 0.35 | 0.51 ± 0.33 | 0.55 ± 0.35 | 0.53 ± 0.35 | 0.56 ± 0.37 | 0.005 |
| lymphocyte (%) | 36.66 ± 8.38 | 36.05 ± 8.06 | 36.84 ± 8.32 | 36.63 ± 8.58 | 36.40 ± 7.89 | 0.074 |
1 ΔT, difference of one-day lag apparent temperature. 2 ANOVA test (analysis of variance) comparing the groups of different ΔT.
Figure 2Box and Whisker plots of WBC counts by the difference values of one-day lag temperature change; * p < 0.05 by Scheffe test.
Figure 3(a) Scatter plot of total WBC counts by one-day lag temperature with trend line of generalized additive model (GAM) procedure. The p-value of the GAM analysis is 0.000154; (b) zoom in the trend line at the central area.
Figure 4The scatter plot graphs of counts of WBC differential types and trend lines of GAM: (a) neutrophil, the p-value of GAM analysis is 0.000219; (b) monocyte, the p value of GAM analysis is 0.00000157; (c) eosinophil, the p value of GAM analysis is 0.000214; (d) basophile, the p value of GAM analysis is 0.0167; (e) lymphocyte, the p value of GAM analysis is 0.305.