Carlos Lorenzo1, Anthony J Hanley, Steven M Haffner. 1. Department of Medicine, University of Texas Health Science Center, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA, lorenzo@uthscsa.edu.
Abstract
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: White cell count has been shown to predict incident type 2 diabetes, but differential white cell count has received scant attention. We examined the risk of developing diabetes associated with differential white cell count and neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio and the effect of insulin sensitivity and subclinical inflammation on white cell associations. METHODS: Incident diabetes was ascertained in 866 participants aged 40-69 years in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study after a 5 year follow-up period. The insulin sensitivity index (SI) was measured by the frequently sampled IVGTT. RESULTS: C-reactive protein was directly and independently associated with neutrophil (p < 0.001) and monocyte counts (p < 0.01) and neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (p < 0.001), whereas SI was inversely and independently related to lymphocyte count (p < 0.05). There were 138 (15.9%) incident cases of diabetes. Demographically adjusted ORs for incident diabetes, comparing the top and bottom tertiles of white cell (1.80 [95% CI 1.10, 2.92]), neutrophil (1.67 [1.04, 2.71]) and lymphocyte counts (2.30 [1.41, 3.76]), were statistically significant. No association was demonstrated for monocyte count (1.18 [0.73, 1.90]) or neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (0.89 [0.55, 1.45]). White cell and neutrophil associations were no longer significant after further adjusting for family history of diabetes, fasting glucose and smoking, but the OR comparing the top and bottom tertiles of lymphocyte count remained significant (1.96 [1.13, 3.37]). This last relationship was better explained by SI rather than C-reactive protein. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: A lymphocyte association with incident diabetes, which was the strongest association among the major white cell types, was partially explained by insulin sensitivity rather than subclinical inflammation.
AIMS/HYPOTHESIS: White cell count has been shown to predict incident type 2 diabetes, but differential white cell count has received scant attention. We examined the risk of developing diabetes associated with differential white cell count and neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio and the effect of insulin sensitivity and subclinical inflammation on white cell associations. METHODS: Incident diabetes was ascertained in 866 participants aged 40-69 years in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study after a 5 year follow-up period. The insulin sensitivity index (SI) was measured by the frequently sampled IVGTT. RESULTS:C-reactive protein was directly and independently associated with neutrophil (p < 0.001) and monocyte counts (p < 0.01) and neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (p < 0.001), whereas SI was inversely and independently related to lymphocyte count (p < 0.05). There were 138 (15.9%) incident cases of diabetes. Demographically adjusted ORs for incident diabetes, comparing the top and bottom tertiles of white cell (1.80 [95% CI 1.10, 2.92]), neutrophil (1.67 [1.04, 2.71]) and lymphocyte counts (2.30 [1.41, 3.76]), were statistically significant. No association was demonstrated for monocyte count (1.18 [0.73, 1.90]) or neutrophil:lymphocyte ratio (0.89 [0.55, 1.45]). White cell and neutrophil associations were no longer significant after further adjusting for family history of diabetes, fasting glucose and smoking, but the OR comparing the top and bottom tertiles of lymphocyte count remained significant (1.96 [1.13, 3.37]). This last relationship was better explained by SI rather than C-reactive protein. CONCLUSIONS/ INTERPRETATION: A lymphocyte association with incident diabetes, which was the strongest association among the major white cell types, was partially explained by insulin sensitivity rather than subclinical inflammation.
Authors: Saul Genuth; K G M M Alberti; Peter Bennett; John Buse; Ralph Defronzo; Richard Kahn; John Kitzmiller; William C Knowler; Harold Lebovitz; Ake Lernmark; David Nathan; Jerry Palmer; Robert Rizza; Christopher Saudek; Jonathan Shaw; Michael Steffes; Michael Stern; Jaako Tuomilehto; Paul Zimmet Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 19.112
Authors: D J Freeman; J Norrie; N Sattar; R D Neely; S M Cobbe; I Ford; C Isles; A R Lorimer; P W Macfarlane; J H McKillop; C J Packard; J Shepherd; A Gaw Journal: Circulation Date: 2001-01-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Barbora Vozarova; Christian Weyer; Robert S Lindsay; Richard E Pratley; Clifton Bogardus; P Antonio Tataranni Journal: Diabetes Date: 2002-02 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Bruce B Duncan; Maria Inês Schmidt; James S Pankow; Christie M Ballantyne; David Couper; Alvaro Vigo; Ron Hoogeveen; Aaron R Folsom; Gerardo Heiss Journal: Diabetes Date: 2003-07 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Birgit Klüppelholz; Barbara Thorand; Wolfgang Koenig; Tonia de Las Heras Gala; Christa Meisinger; Cornelia Huth; Guido Giani; Paul W Franks; Michael Roden; Wolfgang Rathmann; Annette Peters; Christian Herder Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 10.122
Authors: Carrie D Johnston; Donald R Hoover; Qiuhu Shi; Anjali Sharma; David B Hanna; Kathryn Anastos; Phyllis C Tien; Margaret Fischl; Deborah Gustafson; Amanda Spence; Roksana Karim; Audrey French; Michael Schneider; Adaora A Adimora; Caitlin Moran; Deborah Konkle-Parker; Marshall J Glesby Journal: AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses Date: 2019-12-17 Impact factor: 2.205
Authors: Kristina P Vatcheva; Susan P Fisher-Hoch; Mohammad H Rahbar; MinJae Lee; Rene L Olvera; Joseph B Mccormick Journal: Diabetes Res Date: 2015-09-23
Authors: Marshall J Glesby; David B Hanna; Donald R Hoover; Qiuhu Shi; Michael T Yin; Phyllis C Tien; Mardge Cohen; Kathryn Anastos; Anjali Sharma Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-07-31 Impact factor: 4.632
Authors: Simin N Meydani; Sai K Das; Carl F Pieper; Michael R Lewis; Sam Klein; Vishwa D Dixit; Alok K Gupta; Dennis T Villareal; Manjushri Bhapkar; Megan Huang; Paul J Fuss; Susan B Roberts; John O Holloszy; Luigi Fontana Journal: Aging (Albany NY) Date: 2016-07 Impact factor: 5.682
Authors: Nels C Olson; Margaret F Doyle; Ian H de Boer; Sally A Huber; Nancy Swords Jenny; Richard A Kronmal; Bruce M Psaty; Russell P Tracy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-10-12 Impact factor: 3.240