| Literature DB >> 34208722 |
Ines Maria Niederstätter1, Jennifer Lynn Schiefer1, Paul Christian Fuchs1.
Abstract
Usually, cutaneous wound healing does not get impeded and processes uneventfully, reaching wound closure easily. The goal of this repair process is to restore the integrity of the body surface by creating a resilient and stable scar. Surgical practice and strategies have an impact on the course of wound healing and the later appearance of the scar. By considering elementary surgical principles, such as the appropriate suture material, suture technique, and timing, optimal conditions for wound healing can be created. Wounds can be differentiated into clean wounds, clean-contaminated wounds, contaminated, and infected/dirty wounds, based on the degree of colonization or infection. Furthermore, a distinction is made between acute and chronic wounds. The latter are wounds that persist for longer than 4-6 weeks. Care should be taken to avoid surgical site infections in the management of wounds by maintaining sterile working conditions, using antimicrobial working techniques, and implementing the principles of preoperative antibiotics. Successful wound closure is influenced by wound debridement. Wound debridement removes necrotic tissue, senescent and non-migratory cells, bacteria, and foreign bodies that impede wound healing. Additionally, the reconstructive ladder is a viable and partially overlapping treatment algorithm in plastic surgery to achieve successful wound closure.Entities:
Keywords: buried skin graft; debridement; micrograft; plastic surgery; reconstructive ladder; split-thickness skin graft; wound healing
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34208722 PMCID: PMC8293365 DOI: 10.3390/medsci9020045
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci (Basel) ISSN: 2076-3271
Figure 1Relaxed skin tension lines.
Classification of wounds.
| Wound Type | Characteristics |
|---|---|
| clean | uninfected |
| clean/contaminated | uninfected |
| contaminated | accidental |
| infected/dirty | old |
Different types of debridement: advantages and disadvantages.
| Debridement | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| autolytic | easy to perform | contraindicated for infected wounds |
| natural | slow | |
| painless | ||
| enzymatic | easy to perform | contraindicated for infected wounds |
| highly selective | topical agents may inactivate enzymes | |
| mechanical | easy to perform | non-selective |
| faster than autolytic and enzymatic | can be painful | |
| may damage surrounding tissue | ||
| biological | highly selective | patient discomfort, |
| fast | only for selected cases | |
| surgical | fast, | applicable only with anesthesia, |
| requires skilled clinician | causes bleeding |
Figure 2Wound colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
Figure 3The reconstructive ladder.
Figure 4The reconstructive ladder: a combination of methods when conventional steps fail.
Figure 5After wound closure by a combined method: Meeks and BSGs.