| Literature DB >> 34208449 |
Nolan Wen1, Enze Qian2, Yunqing Kang2,3,4.
Abstract
Although the use of porous scaffolds in tissue engineering has been relatively successful, there are still many limitations that need to be addressed, such as low vascularization, low oxygen and nutrient levels, and immune-induced inflammation. As a result, the current porous scaffolds are insufficient when treating large defects. This paper analyzed scientific research pertaining to the effects of macro-/micro-channels on the cell recruitment, vascularization, and immune response of tissue engineering scaffolds. Most of the studies contained either cell culturing experimentation or experimentation on small animals such as rats and mice. The sacrificial template method, template casting method, and 3D printing method were the most common methods in the fabrication of channeled scaffolds. Some studies combine the sacrificial and 3D printing methods to design and create their scaffold with channels. The overall results from these studies showed that the incorporation of channels within scaffolds greatly increased vascularization, reduced immune response, and was much more beneficial for cell and growth factor recruitment compared with control groups that contained no channels. More research on the effect of micro-/macro-channels on vascularization or immune response in animal models is necessary in the future in order to achieve clinical translation.Entities:
Keywords: immune response; microchannel; porous scaffold; tissue engineering
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34208449 PMCID: PMC8235743 DOI: 10.3390/cells10061514
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cells ISSN: 2073-4409 Impact factor: 6.600
List and overview of articles selected for review.
| Scaffold Material | Channel Type | Fabrication Method | Target Application and Research Model | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Polylactic acid (PLA) and nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite (nHA) | 500 μm and 250 μm diameter microchannels | 3D printing | Bone tissue engineering; In vitro cell culture: human mesenchymal stem cell (hMSC) and human umbilical vein endothelial cell (HUVEC) | [ |
| Calcium phosphate cement (CPC) | Interconnected hollow channels of 500 μm and 250 μm sizes | Dissolution of gelatin fibers with diameters of 255 μm and 507 μm | Bone tissue engineering; In vivo rat subcutaneous implantation | [ |
| Polycaprolactone (PCL) | Large pores with microchannels (μCh) 12.9 μm in bulk 21.1 μm on surface | 3D printing with camphene and then camphene sublimed | Bone tissue engineering; In vitro cell culture: hMSC and HUVEC; In vivo rat subcutaneous implantation; In vivo rat calvarium defect model | [ |
| Agarose hydrogel | Unidirectional longitudinal channels with diameters of 500 μm and a centre-centre spacing of 1 mm | Fabricated with a pillared polydimethylsiloxane array structure | Bone tissue engineering; In vivo mouse subcutaneous transplantation | [ |
| Silicate bioceramic | Hollow struts with an external diameter of 1 mm and internal diameter of 500 μm | Coaxial 3D printing with a modified core/shell printer nozzle | Bone tissue engineering; In vitro cell culture: Rabbit BMSCs and HUVEC | [ |
| Porous β-TCP | 1 mm diameter hollow channels | β-TCP slurry casted in paraffin-beads filled mold, solidified, dried and sintered | Bone tissue engineering; In vitro cell culture: hBMSC | [ |
| Chitosan and collagen | The main channel and the branch channel of approximately 744 and 580 μm in diameter | 3D printed sacrificial carbohydrate template placed in the mold and dissolved after scaffold preparation | Myocardial tissue regeneration; In vitro cell culture: Rat cardiomyocytes, HUVEC and C2C12 | [ |
| Macroporous alginate scaffolds | An array of parallel channels with 200 μm diameter and 400 μm wall-to-wall spacing with shifting between lines of 300 μm | Laser piercing technique | Myocardial tissue regeneration; In vitro cell culture (rat cardiac cells and HUVEC) and in vivo mouse subcutaneous implantation | [ |
| Gelatin hydrogel | 2 mm interconnected channels | 3D printed poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) sacrificial template | Prevasculature and blood perfusion; In vitro cell culture (HUVEC) | [ |
| Gelatin hydrogel | Micro- and macro-channels of 16.37 and 150.46 μm in diam-eter | Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) temperature-dependent water-soluble fibers | Prevasculature and blood perfusion; In vivo mouse and porcine models of hindlimb ischemia and in vivo mouse non-ischemia model (greater omentum, normal hindlimb, subcutaneous site) | [ |
| Silk scaffold | 254 μm or 508 μm hollow channels | Linear wire arrays (LWAs) of either 254 μm or 508 μm diameter arranged into a grid pattern with 1 mm spacing between the wires | Neo-vascularization and large tissue construct engineering; In vitro cell culture (human dermal neonatal fibroblasts) and in vivo mouse subcutaneous im-plantation | [ |
| Chitosan scaffold | Regularly-oriented micro-channels ( | Aluminum grids with predetermined holes | Neo-vascularization and large tissue construct engineering; In vitro cell culture (mouse endothelial cells) and in vivo mouse subcutaneous implantation | [ |
| Extracellular matrix (ECM-C) | Uniformly distributed parallel microchannels with an average diameter of 146 μm based on the longitudinal cross-section. | Implanted Aligned PCL microfibers in rat to generate fibrous tissue, then removed PCL and cellular component | Multi tissue regeneration, in vitro cell culture (rat skeletal muscle cells, Schwann cells, vascular smooth muscle cells), in vivo multi-site implantation (Skeletal muscle, nerve and vascular regeneration). | [ |
| Poly (L-lactide-co- | 240 μm channel diameter, inter-fiber pore size of 4.1 μm | Combining melt spinning and electrospinning methods | Nerve regeneration, in vitro cell culture (murine macrophage cells and Schwann cells), and in vivo rat sciatic nerve defects model. | [ |
Figure 1Schematic for the printing of the three-dimensional solid sacrificial template (A). (B) Perfusion of the fabricated connected networks. (a) Front view; (b) side view. Scale bar is 3 mm. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [42]. Copyright © 2016, American Chemical Society.
Figure 2(a). Schematic illustration of the procedure to produce poly(Nisopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) fibers, then channel networks, in a hydrogel within a PDMS mold. (b). Confocal visualization of micro- or microchannel networks in hydrogels with their channel diameter distribution. Channels were perfused with FluoSpheres (45 nm, red). Scale bar = 100 μm. (c). A Schematic illustration of hydrogel implantation into a wound site post-full-thickness defect of mouse dorsal skin with the discovered regeneration process (top box). Photographs of wound healing sites at day 14 post-implantation (bottom row). Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [43] under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Figure 3Schematic for the experimental protocol of the vascularization strategy with an in situ formed channel in CPC structure. Schematic of the vascularization strategy within channels of CPC scaffold: (A). Different channel diameters induced the different expression behaviors for growth factors; then induced the different vessel forming. (B). Micro-CT analysis of CPC-fiber scaffold: 3D reconstruction images (F250/F500: different diameter of fiber; X wt.%: different content of fiber in CPC). Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [35]. © 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Figure 4The structure of the BRT-H scaffolds with about 500 μm inner channels. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [38]. © 2017 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Figure 5Schematic illustration and digital morphologies of three types of β-TCP scaffolds’ structure, (A) without channel, with singular 3 mm diameter channel and with five 1 mm diameter channels, (B) SEM image showed interconnected pores and local strut surface. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [48]. Copyright © 2016, American Chemical Society. (C) Micro-CT images show that channeled scaffolds can maintain the height of regenerated bone, but scaffolds without channels degraded and lowered the height. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [39] © 2016 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim.
Figure 6Preparation of nerve conduit and characterization of macrophage polarization on random nanofiber and oriented microfiber substrates. (A,B) Schematic illustration of natural nerve structure and biomimetic nerve conduit structure along with key fabrication steps. The conduits of A1 and A3 were respectively used for control and experimental groups. Reprinted (adapted) with permission from [46] © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.