| Literature DB >> 34208228 |
Avinash V Karpe1, Melanie L Hutton2, Steven J Mileto2, Meagan L James2, Chris Evans2, Rohan M Shah1,3, Amol B Ghodke4,5, Katie E Hillyer1, Suzanne S Metcalfe1, Jian-Wei Liu6, Tom Walsh6, Dena Lyras2, Enzo A Palombo3, David J Beale1.
Abstract
Cryptosporidiosis is a major human health concern globally. Despite well-established methods, misdiagnosis remains common. Our understanding of the cryptosporidiosis biochemical mechanism remains limited, compounding the difficulty of clinical diagnosis. Here, we used a systems biology approach to investigate the underlying biochemical interactions in C57BL/6J mice infected with Cryptosporidium parvum. Faecal samples were collected daily following infection. Blood, liver tissues and luminal contents were collected 10 days post infection. High-resolution liquid chromatography and low-resolution gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry were used to analyse the proteomes and metabolomes of these samples. Faeces and luminal contents were additionally subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis of the acquired data illustrated altered host and microbial energy pathways during infection. Glycolysis/citrate cycle metabolites were depleted, while short-chain fatty acids and D-amino acids accumulated. An increased abundance of bacteria associated with a stressed gut environment was seen. Host proteins involved in energy pathways and Lactobacillus glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase were upregulated during cryptosporidiosis. Liver oxalate also increased during infection. Microbiome-parasite relationships were observed to be more influential than the host-parasite association in mediating major biochemical changes in the mouse gut during cryptosporidiosis. Defining this parasite-microbiome interaction is the first step towards building a comprehensive cryptosporidiosis model towards biomarker discovery, and rapid and accurate diagnostics.Entities:
Keywords: D-amino acid/SCFA-induced modulation; extra-intestinal effects; host–parasite–microbiome relationships; interactomics; yeast ubiquinone salvation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34208228 PMCID: PMC8230837 DOI: 10.3390/metabo11060380
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Metabolites ISSN: 2218-1989
Figure 1(A) Daily percentage weight change (normalized with respect to 0 dpi) in Balb/C, Swiss and C57BL6/J mice that were infected with C. parvum and monitored for 14 dpi (B) C. parvum count (Log10 growth in terms of oocyst count), per gram fresh weight of faeces. The error bars indicate standard deviation (n = 3, p-value ≤ 0.05).
Figure 2List of top 25 metabolites (in descending order) with significantly high variable importance in projection (VIP) scores in the mouse gut during Cryptosporidium infection. The colors refer to relative depletion (blue) and elevation (red) of the metabolites in the gut of infected mice with respect to the uninfected mice (Refer to Table S13 for data). Note: The scale indicates log transformed and pareto scaled values for the elevated (red) or depleted (blue) metabolites during the infection.
Most significant metabolic pathways in the gut modulated during cryptosporidiosis with respect to the uninfected mice, based on integration of the metabolomics and proteomics data using a joint pathway analysis tool.
| Metabolic Pathway | Match Status | Impact | FDR |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arginine biosynthesis | 13/27 | 1.12 | <0.0001 |
| Citrate cycle (TCA cycle) | 15/42 | 1.95 | <0.0001 |
| Glycolysis or Gluconeogenesis | 16/61 | 1.28 | <0.0001 |
| Pyruvate metabolism | 13/45 | 0.93 | <0.0001 |
| Nitrogen metabolism | 6/10 | 1.00 | 0.0002 |
| Glutathione metabolism | 13/56 | 0.69 | 0.0006 |
| Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism | 13/61 | 0.83 | 0.0015 |
| Glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism | 12/56 | 0.53 | 0.0023 |
| Galactose metabolism | 11/51 | 0.66 | 0.0035 |
| Arginine and proline metabolism | 14/78 | 0.52 | 0.0039 |
Note: Match status = number of (significant metabolites and proteins/total metabolites and proteins) in a pathway; FDR = false discovery rate.
Figure 3The abundance of predominant bacterial genera across regions of the intestinal system of uninfected and Cryptosporidium-infected mice. Individual contribution is presented in Table S1B.
Figure 4Distribution of (A–E) short chain fatty acids (SCFAs) and (F–I) D-amino acids across various regions of the intestinal tract (µg/g FW of samples) of uninfected and Cryptosporidium-infected mice. Note: The error bars represent standard deviation between the experimental replicates of each organ (n = 5).
Figure 5Major proteins expressed by microbial community in response to cryptosporidiosis in (A) the jejunum–ileum and (B) the caecum–colon region. Note: Error bars represent standard deviation between the experimental replicates (n = 10 for A and B).
Figure 6Most prominent host proteins expressed across the mouse intestine (both small and large intestine sections) upon Cryptosporidium infection. Note: Error bars represent standard deviation between the experimental replicates (n = 25).
Figure 7Most prominent metabolic activities in the mouse gut upon Cryptosporidium infection. The pie charts indicate the relative impact of pathways in the duodenum (D), jejunum (J), ileum (I), caecum (C), colon (Co), and faeces (F). The bar graphs show perturbed metabolites in uninfected () and Cryptosporidium () infected mice. Note: Please refer to Figure S8 for a more descriptive pathway chart.
Figure 8Overview of mouse cryptosporidiosis interaction study design showing various mouse samples that were collected. Samples were subjected to GC-MS and LC-HR-MS and resulting data were analysed by multivariate statistics. Samples are annotated as (1) liver tissue, washes of (2) duodenum, (3) jejunum, (4) ileum, (5) caecum, (6) colon, (7) faeces, and (8) serum.