Literature DB >> 34206413

Sample Adequacy Control (SAC) Lowers False Negatives and Increases the Quality of Screening: Introduction of "Non-Competitive" SAC for qPCR Assays.

Ivan Brukner1,2, Alex Resendes1, Shaun Eintracht2, Andreas I Papadakis1, Matthew Oughton2.   

Abstract

Sample Adequacy Control (SAC) has critical analytical, clinical and epidemiological value that increases confidence in a negative test result. The SAC is an integral qPCR assay control, which ensures that all pre-analytical and analytical steps are adequate for accurate testing and reporting. As such, a negative SAC with a negative result on pathogen screen specifies that the result should be reported as inconclusive instead of negative. Despite this, many regulatory approved tests do not incorporate SAC into their assay design. Herein, we emphasize the universal value of SAC and offer for the first time, a simple technical strategy to introduce non-competitive SAC which does not interfere with the limit of detection for the screened pathogen. Integration of SAC can provide key benefits towards identifying, isolating, quarantining and contact tracing infected individuals and in turn can improve worldwide efforts in infection control.

Entities:  

Keywords:  assay; clinical; control; false negative; infection control; pandemic; qPCR; sampling; screening; test

Year:  2021        PMID: 34206413     DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  38 in total

1.  Influence of DNA target melting behavior on real-time PCR quantification.

Authors:  J Wilhelm; M Hahn; A Pingoud
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  The true and false negatives of screening.

Authors:  M A Bullimore
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 1.973

3.  Internal quality control for cervical cytopathology: comparison of potential false-negatives detected at rapid prescreening and at 100% rapid review.

Authors:  Suelene Brito do Nascimento Tavares; Nádja L Alves de Souza; Edna J C Manrique; Cinara Zago Silveira Azara; Erika Aparecida da Silveira; Rita Goreti Amaral
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 2.319

4.  The challenges of defining sample adequacy in an era of HPV based cervical screening.

Authors:  Kate Cuschieri; Allan Wilson; Timothy Palmer; Grazyna Stanczuk; Ramya Bhatia; Ditte Ejegod; Jesper Bonde
Journal:  J Clin Virol       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.168

Review 5.  CORP: Minimizing the chances of false positives and false negatives.

Authors:  Douglas Curran-Everett
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2016-12-01

6.  Ct values from SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic PCR assays should not be used as direct estimates of viral load.

Authors:  Elias Dahdouh; Fernando Lázaro-Perona; María Pilar Romero-Gómez; Jesús Mingorance; Julio García-Rodriguez
Journal:  J Infect       Date:  2020-10-24       Impact factor: 6.072

7.  CoV2-ID, a MIQE-compliant sub-20-min 5-plex RT-PCR assay targeting SARS-CoV-2 for the diagnosis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Stephen Bustin; Amy Coward; Garry Sadler; Louise Teare; Tania Nolan
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-12-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  An in vitro model for assessment of SARS-CoV-2 infectivity by defining the correlation between virus isolation and quantitative PCR value: isolation success of SARS-CoV-2 from oropharyngeal swabs correlates negatively with Cq value.

Authors:  Sissy Therese Sonnleitner; Julian Dorighi; Bianca Jansen; Carmen Schönegger; Sarah Gietl; Stephan Koblmüller; Christian Sturmbauer; Wilfried Posch; Gernot Walder
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.099

9.  Poor Cervical Cancer Screening Attendance and False Negatives. A Call for Organized Screening.

Authors:  Marta Castillo; Aurora Astudillo; Omar Clavero; Julio Velasco; Raquel Ibáñez; Silvia de Sanjosé
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  At what times during infection is SARS-CoV-2 detectable and no longer detectable using RT-PCR-based tests? A systematic review of individual participant data.

Authors:  Sue Mallett; A Joy Allen; Sara Graziadio; Stuart A Taylor; Naomi S Sakai; Kile Green; Jana Suklan; Chris Hyde; Bethany Shinkins; Zhivko Zhelev; Jaime Peters; Philip J Turner; Nia W Roberts; Lavinia Ferrante di Ruffano; Robert Wolff; Penny Whiting; Amanda Winter; Gauraang Bhatnagar; Brian D Nicholson; Steve Halligan
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  1 in total

1.  Importance of Adequate qPCR Controls in Infection Control.

Authors:  Matthew Oughton; Ivan Brukner; Shaun Eintracht; Andreas I Papadakis; Alan Spatz; Alex Resendes
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.