Literature DB >> 34206114

Evaluation of a Novel CLIA Monotest Assay for the Detection of Anti-Hepatitis E Virus-IgG and IgM: A Retrospective Comparison with a Line Blot and an ELISA.

Karl Dichtl1, Julia Zimmermann1,2,3, Martin B Koeppel4, Stephan Böhm2,3, Andreas Osterman2,3.   

Abstract

Despite the increasing relevance of Hepatitis E, an emerging disease endemic in developing and with increasing numbers of sporadic cases in industrialized countries, commercial tests are mainly based on batch oriented serological assays. In this retrospective study, we compared a line immunoassay (LIA; recomLine HEV, Mikrogen) and an ELISA (EIA; Anti-Hepatitis E Virus ELISA, Euroimmun) with a novel chemoluminescence immunoassay in a monotest format (CLIA; Hepatitis E VirClia, Vircell). Twenty sera of PCR proven cases of hepatitis E and 68 blood samples serologically pre-characterized were included. Applying the WHO reference standard, the CLIA demonstrated the highest analytical sensitivity for IgG and IgM. The combinations of CLIA/EIA (IgG and IgM) and CLIA/LIA (IgG) measurements showed substantial correlation. Compared to overall antibody detection (seropositivity in ≥2 assays), CLIA correlation was excellent, outperforming LIA (IgM) and EIA (IgG and IgM). Minor IgM cross reactivity in samples of patients with acute EBV infection was observed in all three assays. The CLIA showed good performance in diagnostic samples compared to established LIA and EIA assays. Due to its ready-to-use monotest format, the CLIA allows simple, time- and cost-effective handling of single samples. These qualities make the assay suitable for diagnostics, especially in the emergency setting and for low-throughput laboratories.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CLIA; ELISA; HEV; LIA; antibody; hepatitis E virus; monotest; serology

Year:  2021        PMID: 34206114     DOI: 10.3390/pathogens10060689

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathogens        ISSN: 2076-0817


  2 in total

1.  Diagnostic Performance of an Automated System for Assaying Anti-Hepatitis E Virus Immunoglobulins M and G Compared with a Conventional Microplate Assay.

Authors:  Florence Abravanel; Delphine Parraud; Sabine Chapuy-Regaud; Marcel Miedouge; Estelle Bonnin; Margaux Larrieu; Alexandre Aversenq; Sébastien Lhomme; Jacques Izopet
Journal:  Viruses       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 5.818

Review 2.  Recent Developments in Innovative Magnetic Nanoparticles-Based Immunoassays: From Improvement of Conventional Immunoassays to Diagnosis of COVID-19.

Authors:  Yeonjeong Ha; Ijung Kim
Journal:  Biochip J       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.229

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.