| Literature DB >> 34205849 |
Giulia Poli1, Sonia Hasan2, Silvia Belia3, Marta Cenciarini4, Stephen J Tucker5, Paola Imbrici6, Safa Shehab7, Mauro Pessia8,9, Stefano Brancorsini1, Maria Cristina D'Adamo8.
Abstract
The ability of spermatozoa to swim towards an oocyte and fertilize it depends on precise K+ permeability changes. Kir5.1 is an inwardly-rectifying potassium (Kir) channel with high sensitivity to intracellular H+ (pHi) and extracellular K+ concentration [K+]o, and hence provides a link between pHi and [K+]o changes and membrane potential. The intrinsic pHi sensitivity of Kir5.1 suggests a possible role for this channel in the pHi-dependent processes that take place during fertilization. However, despite the localization of Kir5.1 in murine spermatozoa, and its increased expression with age and sexual maturity, the role of the channel in sperm morphology, maturity, motility, and fertility is unknown. Here, we confirmed the presence of Kir5.1 in spermatozoa and showed strong expression of Kir4.1 channels in smooth muscle and epithelial cells lining the epididymal ducts. In contrast, Kir4.2 expression was not detected in testes. To examine the possible role of Kir5.1 in sperm physiology, we bred mice with a deletion of the Kcnj16 (Kir5.1) gene and observed that 20% of Kir5.1 knock-out male mice were infertile. Furthermore, 50% of knock-out mice older than 3 months were unable to breed. By contrast, 100% of wild-type (WT) mice were fertile. The genetic inactivation of Kcnj16 also resulted in smaller testes and a greater percentage of sperm with folded flagellum compared to WT littermates. Nevertheless, the abnormal sperm from mutant animals displayed increased progressive motility. Thus, ablation of the Kcnj16 gene identifies Kir5.1 channel as an important element contributing to testis development, sperm flagellar morphology, motility, and fertility. These findings are potentially relevant to the understanding of the complex pHi- and [K+]o-dependent interplay between different sperm ion channels, and provide insight into their role in fertilization and infertility.Entities:
Keywords: KCNJ10; KCNJ15; KCNJ16; Kir4.1; Kir4.2; Kir5.1; epididymis; flagellar morphology; male fertility; potassium channel; sperm motility; spermatozoa; testis
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34205849 PMCID: PMC8199489 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22115972
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1Expression of Kir4.1 and Kir5.1 channels in the cauda epididymis. (A) Kir4.1 is expressed in the epithelial cells lining the epididymal ducts (white arrow) and in peritubular smooth muscle of the cauda epididymis (red arrow). Immunoreactivity was absent in the lumen where spermatozoa are located, implying the lack of Kir4.1 expression in these cells. (B) Magnified image taken from the upper part of panel A. (C) Image showing strong expression of Kir5.1 in spermatozoa. (D) Magnification of the lumen of the cauda epididymis. Staining shows the localisation of Kir5.1 subunits in the head of the sperm. Scale bar in (A), (B), and (C) = 25 µm, and in (D) = 20 µm.
Figure 2Kcnj16 (Kir5.1) ablation reduces testicular weight and volume. The box plots report the evaluation of weight (A) and volume (B) of testis collected from WT and KO mice (n = 8; * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01).
Figure 3Viability and progressive motility of spermatozoa was comparable in WT and KO mice. The box plots report the evaluation of viability (A) and progressive motility (B) for spermatozoa collected from WT and KO mice. Both viability and progressive motility were not significantly changed (p > 0.05) by KO of Kir5.1 channels.
Figure 4Sperm morphology. WT (A) and KO (B) mouse sperm observed by phase contrast (Ph2) microscopy. The spermatozoa of both strains of mice displayed normal cell morphology and folded flagella. Folded flagella were more frequent in KO mice. Scale bar in (A) and (B) = 15 µm.
Figure 5Percentage of spermatozoa with folded tails. Patterns of folded tails from WT and KO mice were analyzed and quantified by phase-contrast microscopy. The box plot showed a significantly higher percentage of spermatozoa with folded tails in the mutant animals compared to WT (* p < 0.01).
Figure 6Percentage of folded-tailed spermatozoa with progressive motility was increased in Kir 5.1 KO mice. Progressive motility of folded-tailed spermatozoa from WT and mutant mice was evaluated. The box plot shows the percentage of folded-tailed spermatozoa with progressive motility in WT and KO mice evaluated by bright-field microscopy (* p < 0.01).