| Literature DB >> 34205260 |
Youngjun Cho1, Heejae Shin1, Jaeu Park1, Sanghoon Lee1.
Abstract
Recently, methods for the treatment of chronic diseases and disorders through the modulation of peripheral and autonomic nerves have been proposed. To investigate various treatment methods and results, experiments are being conducted on animals such as rabbits and rat. However the diameter of the targeted nerves is small (several hundred μm) and it is difficult to modulate small nerves. Therefore, a neural interface that is stable, easy to implant into small nerves, and is biocompatible is required. Here, to develop an advanced neural interface, a thiol-ene/acrylate-based shape memory polymer (SMP) was fabricated with a double clip design. This micro-patterned design is able to be implanted on a small branch of the sciatic nerve, as well as the parasympathetic pelvic nerve, using the shape memory effect (SME) near body temperature. Additionally, the IrO2 coated neural interface was implanted on the common peroneal nerve in order to perform electrical stimulation and electroneurography (ENG) recording. The results demonstrate that the proposed neural interface can be used for the modulation of the peripheral nerve, including the autonomic nerve, towards bioelectronic medicine.Entities:
Keywords: bioelectronic medicine; neural interface; neural recoding; neural stimulation; neuromodulation; shape memory polymer
Year: 2021 PMID: 34205260 PMCID: PMC8235721 DOI: 10.3390/mi12060720
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Fabrication process of the DCNI: (a) Schematic of the fabrication procedure; (b) Fabricated DCNI.
Figure 2The characterization of shape memory polymer (SMP): (a) Storage modulus and (b) Loss factor (Tangent δ).
Figure 3Characterization of DCNI (Au vs IrO2 coating): (a) Impedance measurement of the DCNI and (b) CV test of the DCNI.
Figure 4Stability test of the DCNI: (a) Impedance and CSC change according to volage application time (n = 4); (b) CV curve according to volage application time; and (c) Stability of the bending process (n = 4).
Figure 5Functional implantation in bench up and in vivo: (a) Schematic of DCNI implantation process; (b) CPN implantation of the DCNI; and (c) PN implantation of the DCNI.
Figure 6In vivo experiments of neural signal recording and neural stimulation: (a) Schematic of stimulation and recording process; (b) The recorded EMG signals according to the nerve stimulation through DCNI; (c) Peak-to-peak amplitude of the EMG signals (n = 60); (d) The recorded ENG signals through DCNI according to the nerve stimulation through a hook electrode; and (e) Peak-to-peak amplitude of the CNAP (n = 60).