| Literature DB >> 34205146 |
Ekaterina P Karaulova1, Evgeny V Yakush1, Tatiana N Slutskaya1, Lidiya V Shulgina1.
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to investigate the proximate composition, antiradical properties and hepatoprotective activity of three species of shellfish, Corbicula japonica, Spisula sachalinensis, and Anadara broughtonii, from the coastal areas of Far East Russia. Biologically active peptides such as taurine (3.74 g/100 g protein) and ornithine (2.12 g/100 g protein) have been found in the tissues of A. broughtonii. C. japonica contains a high amount of ornithine (5.57 g/100 g protein) and taurine (0.85 g/100 g protein). The maximum DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging activity (36.0 µg ascorbic acid/g protein and 0.68 µmol/Trolox equiv/g protein, respectively) was determined for the tissue of C. japonica. The protein and peptide molecular weight distribution of the shellfish tissue water extracts was investigated using HPLC. It was found that the amount of low molecular weight proteins and peptides were significantly and positively correlated with radical scavenging activity (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.96), while the amount of high molecular weight proteins negatively correlated with radical scavenging activity (Pearson's correlation coefficient = -0.86). Hepatoprotective activity, measured by the survival rate of HepG2 hepatocytes after cotreatment with t-BHP, was detected for C. japonica. The highest protection (95.3 ± 2.4%) was achieved by the cold water extract of C. japonica at the concentration of 200 mg/mL. Moreover, oral administration of hot water extract of C. japonica to rats before the treatment with CCl4 exhibited a markedly protective effect by lowering serum levels of ALT and AST, inhibiting the changes in biochemical parameters of functional state of rat liver, including MDA, SOD, GSH and GST.Entities:
Keywords: Pacific region; hepatoprotective activity; radical scavenging activity; shellfish
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34205146 PMCID: PMC8199966 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26113397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Proximate composition of muscle tissue of bivalve mollusks (%).
| Parameter | Mean Value ± SD | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| Moisture * | 89.0 ± 0.3 | 80.1 ± 0.2 | 80.2 ± 0.3 |
| Dry matter | 11.0 ± 0.3 | 19.9 ± 0.2 | 19.8 ± 0.3 |
| Ash | 10.0 ± 0.1 | 10.1 ± 0.1 | 8.6 ± 0.1 |
| Protein | 38.1 ± 0.3 | 61.1 ± 0.2 | 81.9 ± 0.2 |
| Fat | 33.2 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.1 | 3.8 ± 0.1 |
| Carbohydrate | 19.1 ± 0.3 | 24.2 ± 0.2 | 6.1 ± 0.3 |
* Moisture based on 100 g fresh weight; all other parameters based on 100 g dry weight.
Amino acid prolife of bivalve mollusks tissue, g/100 g protein.
| Amino Acid |
|
|
| FAO/WHO |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Histidine | 3.61 | 1.83 | 1.94 | 1.5 |
| Isoleucine | 4.35 | 4.13 | 3.93 | 3.0 |
| Leucine | 6.90 | 7.05 | 6.51 | 5.9 |
| Lysine | 7.26 | 6.79 | 5.39 | 4.5 |
| Methionine + Cysteine | 1.95 | 3.64 | 1.14 | 2.2 |
| Phenylalanine + Tyrosine | 7.13 | 4.65 | 4.68 | 3.8 |
| Threonine | 5.28 | 4.24 | 3.92 | 2.3 |
| Valine | 5.02 | 4.76 | 4.12 | 3.9 |
| Total EAAs | 41.50 | 37.09 | 31.63 | 27.7 |
Mineral content of the tissue of bivalve mollusks (µg/g wet weight).
| Mineral |
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Ca | 534.4 ± 12.5 | 328.5 ± 21.5 | 171.5 ± 15.2 |
| Mg | 359.2 ± 9.1 | 280.3 ± 8.6 | 228.3 ± 12.3 |
| Na | 1692.5 ± 24.3 | 1256.3 ± 35.6 | 1456.8 ± 25.6 |
| K | 4203.5 ± 45.6 | 3970.7 ± 35.4 | 3561.4 ± 56.2 |
| Fe | 43.2 ± 6.3 | 65.2 ± 8.9 | 57.1 ± 2.5 |
| Mn | 2.6 ± 0.8 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| Zn | 45.6 ± 2.5 | 12.4 ± 1.7 | 13.2 ± 2.1 |
| Cu | 2.7 ± 0.9 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.4 |
Figure 1DPPH radical scavenging activity of water-soluble proteins of bivalve tissue.
Figure 2ABTS radical scavenging activity of water-soluble proteins of bivalve tissue.
Figure 3Molecular weight distribution of water-soluble proteins and peptides of cold (A) and hot (B) water extract of bivalve tissue.
The correlation coefficients between the amount of the four protein groups and the total radical scavenging activity of the water extracts of bivalve tissue.
| Molecular Weight Group | Pearson’s Correlation Coefficient | Determination | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DPPH | ABTS | DPPH | ABTS | DPPH | ABTS | |
| Group I | 0.1436 | 0.0559 | 0.0206 | 0.0031 | 0.7861 | 0.9163 |
| Group II | −0.8591 | −0.8166 | 0.0284 | 0.6669 | 0.7381 | 0.0474 |
| Group III | 0.9633 | 0.9570 | 0.0020 | 0.0027 | 0.9280 | 0.9158 |
| Group IV | 0.9144 | 0.9374 | 0.0107 | 0.0057 | 0.8362 | 0.8788 |
The DPPH radical scavenging activity of the molecular fractions of the water extracts of bivalve tissue.
| Bivalve Tissue | DPPH Radical Scavenging Activity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group I | Group II | Group III | Group IV | |
| n/d * | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 17.5 ± 0.5 | 10.8 ± 0.3 | |
| n/d | 3.8 ± 0.1 | 11.3 ± 0.3 | 6.2 ± 0.2 | |
| n/d | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 7.7 ± 0.2 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | |
| n/d | n/d | 2.5 ± 0.1 | 1.9 ± 0.1 | |
| n/d | 1.2 ± 0.2 | 8.1 ± 0.2 | 4.1 ± 0.2 | |
| n/d | n/d | 4.6 ± 0.2 | 2.6 ± 0.3 | |
*—n/d—not detected.
Figure 4Effect of water bivalve extracts on cytotoxicity of t-BHP-induced HepG2 cells. (A) Hot water extracts; (B) cold water extracts; control—control sample, untreated; control negative-treated with t-BHP (0.4 mM).
Relative liver weight of CCl4-treated rats with and without the gavage of C. japonica extract.
| Group | Relative Liver Weight (g/100 g Body Weight) |
|---|---|
| Control | 4.1 ± 0.2 |
| CCl4 | 5.4 ± 0.3 |
| 4.2 ± 0.1 | |
| Carsil + CCl4 | 4.6 ± 0.1 |
Effect of C. japonica extract on CCl4 induced elevation in AST and ALT levels.
| Group | ALT, mM/L | AST, mM/L |
|---|---|---|
| Control | 2.7 ± 0.3 | 4.5 ± 0.1 |
| CCl4 | 11.6 ± 1.4 * | 9.7 ± 0.8 * |
| 4.5 ± 0.6 ** | 5.7 ± 0.5 ** | |
| Carsil + CCl4 | 3.6 ± 0.5 ** | 5.3 ± 0.6 ** |
Values are mean ± SD of 5–6 rats. * Significantly different from the control group, p < 0.05. ** Significantly different from the group treated with CCl4 only, p < 0.05.
Effect of C. japonica extract on rat liver MDA, SOD, CAT and GPX in CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity in rats.
| Group | MDA, nmol/mg | SOD, U/mg Protein | CAT, U/mg Protein | GPX, U/mg Protein |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 1.72 ± 0.13 | 125.6 ± 5.2 | 287.3 ± 7.9 | 0.84 ± 0.04 |
| CCl4 | 5.12 ± 0.27 * | 58.1 ± 3.3 * | 195.1 ± 6.1 * | 0.34 ± 0.01 * |
| 2.24 ± 0.17 ** | 118.3 ± 4.1 ** | 263.7 ± 5.5 ** | 0.68 ± 0.07 ** | |
| Carsil + CCl4 | 1.28 ± 0.19 ** | 109.9 ± 6.1 ** | 274.7 ± 7.4 ** | 0.75 ± 0.04 ** |
Values are mean ± SD of 5–6 rats. * Significantly different from the control group, p < 0.05. ** Significantly different from the group treated with CCl4 only, p < 0.05.