| Literature DB >> 34204879 |
Swapnil Gorakh Waghmare1, Azin Mohagheghi Samarin1, Azadeh Mohagheghi Samarin1, Marianne Danielsen2,3,4, Hanne Søndergård Møller2, Tomáš Policar1, Otomar Linhart1, Trine Kastrup Dalsgaard2,3,4.
Abstract
Aging is the most critical factor that influences the quality of post-ovulatory oocytes. Age-related molecular pathways remain poorly understood in fish oocytes. In this study, we examined the effect of oocyte aging on specific histone acetylation in common carp Cyprinus carpio. The capacity to progress to the larval stage in oocytes that were aged for 28 h in vivo and in vitro was evaluated. Global histone modifications and specific histone acetylation (H3K9ac, H3K14ac, H4K5ac, H4K8ac, H4K12ac, and H4K16ac) were investigated during oocyte aging. Furthermore, the activity of histone acetyltransferase (HAT) was assessed in fresh and aged oocytes. Global histone modifications did not exhibit significant alterations during 8 h of oocyte aging. Among the selected modifications, H4K12ac increased significantly at 28 h post-stripping (HPS). Although not significantly different, HAT activity exhibited an upward trend during oocyte aging. Results of our current study indicate that aging of common carp oocytes for 12 h results in complete loss of egg viability rates without any consequence in global and specific histone modifications. However, aging oocytes for 28 h led to increased H4K12ac. Thus, histone acetylation modification as a crucial epigenetic mediator may be associated with age-related defects, particularly in oocytes of a more advanced age.Entities:
Keywords: Cyprinus carpio; egg quality; epigenetics; histone acetyltransferase; histone modifications; post-ovulatory aging
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34204879 PMCID: PMC8199789 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22116036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Effects of in vivo and in vitro oocyte aging at 20 °C on the eyeing and hatching rates in common carp (mean ± SD). Means sharing a common alphabetical symbol do not differ significantly.
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Eyeing % | 88 ± 9 a | 91 ± 5 a | 77 ± 16 ab | 66 ± 30 ab | 46 ± 25 bc | 15 ± 11 cd | 3 ± 4 d | 0 ± 0 d | ||||||
| Hatching % | 83 ± 16 a | 88 ± 10 a | 71 ± 21 a | 59 ± 31 ab | 31 ± 19 bc | 6 ± 5 c | 0.7 ± 1 c | 0 ± 0 c | ||||||
|
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Eyeing % | 95 ± 4 a | 94 ± 3 a | 92 ± 3 a | 84 ± 8 a | 62 ± 6 b | 40 ± 5 c | 0 ± 0 d | |||||||
| Hatching % | 94 ± 4 a | 92 ± 1 a | 88 ± 5 a | 68 ± 15 ab | 36 ± 22 bc | 21 ± 9 cd | 0 ± 0 d | |||||||
HPO: Hours post-ovulation; HPS: Hours post-stripping.
Figure 1Effect of in vivo (A) and in vitro (B) oocyte aging on the acetylation of the selected histone lysines in common carp (p < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; ns: non-significant; ** p < 0.01, mean ± SEM); (C) Comparison of histone acetylation at 8 and 28 h between in vivo and in vitro aging conditions. (D) Western blot images for H3K9ac, H4K5ac, H4K8ac and H4K12ac; (E) Western blot images for H3K16ac and H4K514ac including positive control (mouse liver histones). The numbers in red colour indicate the biological replicates as: fish 1 (1, 4, 7, 10), fish 2 (2, 5, 8, 11, 13), and fish 3 (3, 6, 9, 12, 14).
Figure 2Effect of in vivo (A) and in vitro (B) oocyte aging at 20 °C on the histone acetyltransferase activity in common carp (p < 0.05, Tukey’s multiple comparisons test; ns: non-significant; mean ± SEM).