| Literature DB >> 34204458 |
Nachi Ebihara1,2, Hideshi Ikemoto1, Naoki Adachi1, Takayuki Okumo1,3, Taro Kimura1,3, Kanako Yusa1,3, Satoshi Hattori1, Atsufumi Manabe2, Tadashi Hisamitsu1, Masataka Sunagawa1.
Abstract
Background: Japanese herbal medicine, called Kampo medicine, and acupuncture are mainly used in Japanese traditional medicine. In this experiment, the analgesic effect of Yokukansan (YKS) alone and a combination of YKS and electroacupuncture (EA) on inflammatory pain induced by formalin injection were examined.Entities:
Keywords: Kampo medicine; electroacupuncture; formalin; phosphorylated ERK
Year: 2021 PMID: 34204458 PMCID: PMC8234278 DOI: 10.3390/medicines8060031
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicines (Basel) ISSN: 2305-6320
Figure 1Experimental design of the study. Yokukansan (YKS) was mixed with powdered rodent chow at a concentration of 3% and was fed to the rats in the YKS and YKS + EA groups for 7 days. Electroacupuncture (EA) was performed at a frequency of 4 Hz for 30 min immediately before formalin injection in the YKS + EA group. The analgesic effects were determined using a formalin test (for 60 min), and then, spinal cord (L4–L5) samples for immunohistochemistry and western blot analysis were collected.
Figure 2Preemptive analgesic effect of YKS and that of a combination of YKS and EA on pain-related behaviors induced by formalin injection. The total durations of the pain-related behaviors during the early (A) and late phases (B) are shown. The combination of YKS and EA led to significant antinociceptive effects during the late phase of the response, while YKS alone tended to show analgesic effects. n = 6; ** p < 0.01 (vs. the control group); ## p < 0.01 (vs. the formalin group).
Figure 3Immunohistochemical analysis of pERK1/2 in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord (L5). Images of pERK1/2 immunoreactivity (red) are shown (A, upper; original magnification ×20). White bars = 200 µm. The upper panels are the enlarged images of pERK1/2 immunoreactivity (A, lower; original magnification ×60). White bars = 50 µm. (B) The number of pERK1/2-positive cells are shown. n = 5, ** p < 0.01 (vs. the control group); # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 (vs. the formalin group); †† p < 0.01 (vs. the YKS group).
Figure 4Protein expression levels of pERK1/2 in the spinal cord (L4–L5). (A) Immunoblot bands of pERK1/2 and total ERK1/2 are shown. (B) Quantified pERK1/2 levels are shown. n = 6, ** p < 0.01 (vs. the control group); # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 (vs. the formalin group).