Literature DB >> 34201809

Evaluation of Complete Pathological Regression after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients with BRCA1 Founder Mutation Aided Bayesian A/B Testing Approach.

Piotr Kedzierawski1,2, Pawel Macek1,3, Izabela Ciepiela2, Artur Kowalik4,5, Stanislaw Gozdz1,6.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the probability of pathologic complete regression (pCR) by the BRCA1 gene mutation status in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The study involved 143 women (mean age 55.4 ± 13.1 years) with TNBC. The BRCA1 mutation was observed in 17% of the subjects. The most commonly used (85.3%) chemotherapy regimen was four cycles of adriamycine and cyclophosphamide followed by 12 cycles of paclitaxel (4AC + 12T). The differences between clinico-pathological factors by BRCA1 status were estimated. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for pCR vs. non-pCR were calculated using logistic regression. The probability distribution of pCR based on BRCA1 status was estimated using beta distributions. The presence of T3-T4 tumours, cancer in stages II and III, lymphovascular invasion, and the use of chemotherapy schedules other than 4AC + 12T significantly decreased the odds of pCR. It was established that there was a 20% chance that pCR in patients with the BRCA1 mutation was 50% or more times as frequent than in patients without the mutation. Thus, the BRCA1 mutation can be a predictive factor for pCR in patients with TNBC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA1; Bayesian statistics; breast cancer; pathologic complete regression; triple-negative breast cancer

Year:  2021        PMID: 34201809     DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071144

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)        ISSN: 2075-4418


  32 in total

Review 1.  Advances in the systemic treatment of triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  J M Lebert; R Lester; E Powell; M Seal; J McCarthy
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2018-06-13       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 2.  Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Who Should Receive Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

Authors:  Lubna N Chaudhary; K Hope Wilkinson; Amanda Kong
Journal:  Surg Oncol Clin N Am       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.495

3.  The triple negative paradox: primary tumor chemosensitivity of breast cancer subtypes.

Authors:  Lisa A Carey; E Claire Dees; Lynda Sawyer; Lisa Gatti; Dominic T Moore; Frances Collichio; David W Ollila; Carolyn I Sartor; Mark L Graham; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  Randomized trial of dose-dense versus conventionally scheduled and sequential versus concurrent combination chemotherapy as postoperative adjuvant treatment of node-positive primary breast cancer: first report of Intergroup Trial C9741/Cancer and Leukemia Group B Trial 9741.

Authors:  Marc L Citron; Donald A Berry; Constance Cirrincione; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer; William J Gradishar; Nancy E Davidson; Silvana Martino; Robert Livingston; James N Ingle; Edith A Perez; John Carpenter; David Hurd; James F Holland; Barbara L Smith; Carolyn I Sartor; Eleanor H Leung; Jeffrey Abrams; Richard L Schilsky; Hyman B Muss; Larry Norton
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2003-02-13       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Impact of the addition of carboplatin and/or bevacizumab to neoadjuvant once-per-week paclitaxel followed by dose-dense doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide on pathologic complete response rates in stage II to III triple-negative breast cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance).

Authors:  William M Sikov; Donald A Berry; Charles M Perou; Baljit Singh; Constance T Cirrincione; Sara M Tolaney; Charles S Kuzma; Timothy J Pluard; George Somlo; Elisa R Port; Mehra Golshan; Jennifer R Bellon; Deborah Collyar; Olwen M Hahn; Lisa A Carey; Clifford A Hudis; Eric P Winer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-08-04       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Triple-negative high-risk breast cancer derives particular benefit from dose intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: results of WSG AM-01 trial.

Authors:  O Gluz; U A Nitz; N Harbeck; E Ting; R Kates; A Herr; W Lindemann; C Jackisch; W E Berdel; H Kirchner; B Metzner; F Werner; G Schütt; M Frick; C Poremba; R Diallo-Danebrock; S Mohrmann
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 32.976

7.  Response rates and pathologic complete response by breast cancer molecular subtype following neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Waqar Haque; Vivek Verma; Sandra Hatch; V Suzanne Klimberg; E Brian Butler; Bin S Teh
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Adjuvant versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer patients with BRCA mutations.

Authors:  Katherine Clifton; Angelica Gutierrez-Barrera; Junsheng Ma; Roland Bassett; Jennifer Litton; Henry Kuerer; Stacy Moulder; Constance Albarracin; Gabriel Hortobagyi; Banu Arun
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in triple-negative versus luminal-like breast cancers: genotype-phenotype correlation in a cohort of 531 patients.

Authors:  Lorena Incorvaia; Daniele Fanale; Marco Bono; Valentina Calò; Alessia Fiorino; Chiara Brando; Lidia Rita Corsini; Sofia Cutaia; Daniela Cancelliere; Alessia Pivetti; Clarissa Filorizzo; Maria La Mantia; Nadia Barraco; Stefania Cusenza; Giuseppe Badalamenti; Antonio Russo; Viviana Bazan
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-12-16       Impact factor: 8.168

Review 10.  Triple-negative breast cancer molecular subtyping and treatment progress.

Authors:  Li Yin; Jiang-Jie Duan; Xiu-Wu Bian; Shi-Cang Yu
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.