Literature DB >> 18174609

Triple-negative high-risk breast cancer derives particular benefit from dose intensification of adjuvant chemotherapy: results of WSG AM-01 trial.

O Gluz1, U A Nitz, N Harbeck, E Ting, R Kates, A Herr, W Lindemann, C Jackisch, W E Berdel, H Kirchner, B Metzner, F Werner, G Schütt, M Frick, C Poremba, R Diallo-Danebrock, S Mohrmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This paper evaluates the prognostic and predictive impact of protein expression of various molecular markers in high-risk breast cancer (HRBC) patients with >9 involved lymph nodes, who received different chemotherapy dose-intensification strategies within a prospective randomized WSG AM-01 trial.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Paraffin-embedded tumors from 236 patients, who were randomly assigned to dose-dense conventional chemotherapy with four cycles of E(90)C(600) followed by three cycles of C(600)M(40)F(600) every 2 weeks (DD) or a rapidly cycled tandem high-dose regimen with two cycles of E(90)C(600) every 2 weeks followed by two cycles of E(90)C(3000)Thiotepa(400) every 3 weeks (HD), were available for retrospective central pathological review (116 HD/120 DD). Expression of estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), MIB-1, epidermal growth factor receptor, and Her-2/neu was evaluated immunohistochemically using tissue microarrays. Results were correlated with follow-up data and treatment effects by proportional hazard Cox regression models (including interaction analysis).
RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 61.7 months, 5-year event-free survival (EFS) as well as overall survival (OS) rates for the 236 patients were significantly better in the HD arm: EFS: 62% versus 41% [hazard ratio (HR) = 0.60, 95% CI 0.43-0.85, P = 0.004]; OS: 76% versus 61% (HR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.39-0.87, P = 0.007). In multivariate analysis, HD, tumor size <3 cm, positive PR, negative MIB-1 staining, and grade 1/2 were associated with favorable outcome. Interaction analysis showed that regarding predictive effects, triple negative (ER/PR/Her-2/neu) and G3 tumors derived most benefit from HD.
CONCLUSION: Tandem HD improves both EFS and OS in HRBC. This therapy effect may be partly attributable to superior efficacy in the subgroup of triple-negative tumors and/or G3 with their poor prognostic marker profile.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18174609     DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdm551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  31 in total

1.  How do I treat "triple-negative" disease.

Authors:  Christos Vaklavas; Andres Forero-Torres
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2011-12

2.  Long-term survival after high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cell rescue for high-risk, locally advanced/inflammatory, and metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  A VanderWalde; W Ye; P Frankel; D Asuncion; L Leong; T Luu; R Morgan; P Twardowski; M Koczywas; R Pezner; I B Paz; K Margolin; J Wong; J H Doroshow; S Forman; S Shibata; G Somlo
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Emerging trends in the treatment of triple-negative breast cancer in Canada: a survey.

Authors:  S Verma; L Provencher; R Dent
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.677

4.  Low-Dose Oral Cyclophosphamide and Methotrexate Maintenance for Hormone Receptor-Negative Early Breast Cancer: International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 22-00.

Authors:  Marco Colleoni; Kathryn P Gray; Shari Gelber; István Láng; Beat Thürlimann; Lorenzo Gianni; Ehtesham A Abdi; Henry L Gomez; Barbro K Linderholm; Fabio Puglisi; Carlo Tondini; Elena Kralidis; Alexandru Eniu; Katia Cagossi; Daniel Rauch; Jacquie Chirgwin; Richard D Gelber; Meredith M Regan; Alan S Coates; Karen N Price; Giuseppe Viale; Aron Goldhirsch
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Trastuzumab-Resistant Luminal B Breast Cancer Cells Show Basal-Like Cell Growth Features Through NF-κB-Activation.

Authors:  Hirotaka Kanzaki; Nishit K Mukhopadhya; Xiaojiang Cui; V Krishnan Ramanujan; Ramachandran Murali
Journal:  Monoclon Antib Immunodiagn Immunother       Date:  2016-01-21

Review 6.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for "triple negative" breast cancer: a review of current practice and future outlook.

Authors:  Zeina Nahleh
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Favorable response to doxorubicin combination chemotherapy does not yield good clinical outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer with triple-negative phenotype.

Authors:  Seong Yoon Yi; Jin Seok Ahn; Ji Eun Uhm; Do Hyoung Lim; Sang Hoon Ji; Hyun Jung Jun; Kyoung Ha Kim; Myung Hee Chang; Min Jae Park; Eun Yoon Cho; Yoon La Choi; Yeon Hee Park; Young-Hyuck Im
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 8.  Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease.

Authors:  Giampaolo Bianchini; Justin M Balko; Ingrid A Mayer; Melinda E Sanders; Luca Gianni
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Recent advances in systemic therapy. When HER2 is not the target: advances in the treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  David W Miles
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 6.466

10.  Prognostic impact of human epidermal growth factor-like receptor 2 and hormone receptor status in inflammatory breast cancer (IBC): analysis of 2,014 IBC patient cases from the California Cancer Registry.

Authors:  Jason A Zell; Walter Y Tsang; Thomas H Taylor; Rita S Mehta; Hoda Anton-Culver
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-02-19       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.